Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

What does offset mean???im just now gettin into the whole sars thing :D but im 15 and live in japan and am loving my skyline anyways enough about me lol also what width should i look for???? I have an R34 1998 2.5 GT i know i need 5x114.3 but thats all i know what else do i need 2 look for?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/219669-what-does-offset-mean/
Share on other sites

Offset is how far the hub of the wheel is from the centre of the wheel. So basically the lower the offset, the more dish you will get. Or more spoke concavity depending on the style of the rim. But this also means that the wheel in general will sit further out the lower you go with offset.

In general lower offset = tough, but more effort involved in getting the wheel to sit right if you go too low (guard mods, camber, stretched tyres).

For your car id go something like 18x8.5 front and 18x9.5 rear. With maybe 35-ish offset for something reasonable.

will these rims work fo my car? i am conserned about the 45mm offset in the rear but i'm not sure if it matters in the front bacause it does not rotate...will these work? thanx

Brand:Ruff RacingNumber of Bolts:5Material:Alloy Width:8.5J Front/9.5J RearBolt Pattern:5 x 114.3/5 x 120Structure:One Piece Diameter:18 inchesOffset:38 Front/45 RearPart Number (MPN):9308912B45

For your car id go something like 18x8.5 front and 18x9.5 rear. With maybe 35-ish offset for something reasonable.

Yeah , i agree as mentioned above, this is the offset and rim size i am running on my GTT R34, have a look at my gallery pics to give you an idea.

cheers

David

most ppl want the wheel to completely fill their guards.

the more towards 0 (well...negative really) acompanied by width, the more it'll fill it out.

google for 'offset calculator' to see the difference new rims will make from ur old rims.

this is my car below with

18x10 +18 rear

18x9+20 front with a +25mm spacer...effectively making it 18x9 -5.

CIMG3374.jpg

ofcourse you'll need to roll ur guards and if u keep going flaring your guards.

so basically figure out what others r running on the 34's with a guard roll (only costs $50 a corner to do) and go for that is my suggestion.

Edited by Nav2k

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...