Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

shame the failure on the last run.

It did move around a bit more that the run the day before I think as well. Still ran a 7 at only 160mph! Tough. Would have ran 7.80s on that track if it didnt break!

Huge Congrats to Mark and the Team, was great to watch.

Bring on Jamboree... Side by side 7s please!!!!

:cheers:

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Huge Congrats to Mark and the Team, was great to watch.

Bring on Jamboree... Side by side 7s please!!!! :cheers:

Is another Oz GTR going to be there gunning for 7s?? I heard rumour GTR700 might be making a come back.

well extremely surprised is an understatement...im gobsmacked :(

this is some of the parts claimed to be used in the Sentra...

stock block

stock connecting rods

stock pistons

stock head gasket

stock cylinder head

stock cams

stock cam gears

stock timing belt

stock crank

stock intake manifold(slightly modified)

Why is the rest of the world spending $20K+ building tough race long engines...the 'seppo's' are running high 7's with a long engine you can pick up in a wrecking yard!

Adrian you know more than anyone that drag racers have records for everything :)

All sounds perfectly feasible.

:cheers:

If it had standard injectors you'd have to think it was built in WA!!

Awesome Work Congrats to all involved :D

........This makes the car the 3rd fastest GTR in the world and the quickest 2.6ltr RB 26 in the world.

It actually makes it the 4th fastest but only just

Duke Racing R33 GTR 7.942

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/7-...ls-t126768.html

AHHH so Duke DID do a 7, I had in my head that they had but when I searched around I couldn't find any proof of it.

AHHH so Duke DID do a 7, I had in my head that they had but when I searched around I couldn't find any proof of it.

youll find that the duke car is now in england and owned by a guy name mick beggley (sp). its yet to run a 7 in england but from the word on the uk boards is its very close!

youll find that the duke car is now in england and owned by a guy name mick beggley (sp). its yet to run a 7 in england but from the word on the uk boards is its very close!

Haha yeah, "7s is imanent". Done 8.4 in his hands after a bunch of "improvements" so far. Will be interesting to see how it goes

so has it done a 7 or not.... cant find any videos or info... im sure it would have been big news...

cheers, mark

Awesome Work Congrats to all involved :(

It actually makes it the 4th fastest but only just

Duke Racing R33 GTR 7.942

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/7-...ls-t126768.html

also just letting all know that the godzilla 7 sec gtr is up for sale .. with a fresh motor 90grand...sponsours can be arranged for new owner...and track support.

motor is still fine from the 7 sec passes had a broken wire in the crank angle sensor...bugger

we are working my best mates pro rwd nissan g35 now should be finished at christmas.ready for testing..

and our goal once i sell my car is to have 2 of the same pro rwd cars... one with a vq35 and mine with a rb26 for a little while just for fun...

cheers, mark..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...