Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey all i have just been researching oil restiction for this build. i have taken the following info from the major thread. info was provided by gary (sydney kid) and can be found on page 153. here it is again. hope this helps some ppl

RB26 cylinder head= 2 oil feed galleries between the block and the head

We block one off, same as RB26's are standard

We use a 1.5 mm restrictor in the other

Plenty of oil flow to the camshaft bearings, not too much oil slopping around in the head, getting chucked into the catch can and leaving the sump in short supply.

RB25 with VVT= 2 oil feed galleries between the block and the head

Plus 1 feed to the VVT actuator

We block one off, same as RB26's are standard

We use a 1.5 mm restrictor in the other

Plus leave the VVT oil feed as per standard

Plenty of oil flow to the camshaft bearings and VVT actuator but not too much oil slopping around in the head, getting chucked into the catch can and leaving the sump in short supply.

RB25 without VVT= 2 oil feed galleries between the block and the head

Plus 1 feed to the VVT actuator

We block one off, same as RB26's are standard

We use a 2.0 mm restrictor in the other

Plus block off the VVT oil feed

and a couple of diagrams

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...st&id=26521

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...st&id=26522

the only question i still have that i have not been able to find an answer to is,

does it matter which gallery you restrict and which you block off??

dan

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/222706-oil-restriction/
Share on other sites

hey all i have just been researching oil restiction for this build. i have taken the following info from the major thread. info was provided by gary (sydney kid) and can be found on page 153. here it is again. hope this helps some ppl

RB26 cylinder head= 2 oil feed galleries between the block and the head

We block one off, same as RB26's are standard

We use a 1.5 mm restrictor in the other

Plenty of oil flow to the camshaft bearings, not too much oil slopping around in the head, getting chucked into the catch can and leaving the sump in short supply.

RB25 with VVT= 2 oil feed galleries between the block and the head

Plus 1 feed to the VVT actuator

We block one off, same as RB26's are standard

We use a 1.5 mm restrictor in the other

Plus leave the VVT oil feed as per standard

Plenty of oil flow to the camshaft bearings and VVT actuator but not too much oil slopping around in the head, getting chucked into the catch can and leaving the sump in short supply.

RB25 without VVT= 2 oil feed galleries between the block and the head

Plus 1 feed to the VVT actuator

We block one off, same as RB26's are standard

We use a 2.0 mm restrictor in the other

Plus block off the VVT oil feed

and a couple of diagrams

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...st&id=26521

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...st&id=26522

the only question i still have that i have not been able to find an answer to is,

does it matter which gallery you restrict and which you block off??

dan

I thought I was quite specific when I posted "same as RB26's are standard" ie; the front one

Cheers

Gary

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/222706-oil-restriction/#findComment-3932093
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
RB25 without VVT= 2 oil feed galleries between the block and the head

Plus 1 feed to the VVT actuator

We block one off, same as RB26's are standard

We use a 2.0 mm restrictor in the other

Plus block off the VVT oil feed

I ran with a single 1.5mm up front and blocked rear as suggested in the thread.

The setup seems ok and has travelled quite a few kms but from day one I was getting a little valve train noise for a fraction of a second following start up of which was not there prior.

If I were to do it again I'd probably go with leaving the std RB30 1.8mm restrictor up front.

All though I possibly believe the valve train noise was as a result of the head bloke not knowing what he was doing with the lifters as a result they trapped a little air inside.

So as they so do it right do it yourself. I've pulled the lifters apart; meticulously cleaned, primed and reassembled.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/222706-oil-restriction/#findComment-3982794
Share on other sites

Im using th 25de (vvt). Ive been told i have two main options, one is to block the rear gallery all together but was told it can starve one end of the head during start up. Which isnt much of a trouble as it disappears once oil pressure is up but id rather go with the other option to just restrict both galleries using the tomei restrictors. Anyone else gone 4 this option?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/222706-oil-restriction/#findComment-3994028
Share on other sites

Im using th 25de (vvt). Ive been told i have two main options, one is to block the rear gallery all together but was told it can starve one end of the head during start up. Which isnt much of a trouble as it disappears once oil pressure is up but id rather go with the other option to just restrict both galleries using the tomei restrictors. Anyone else gone 4 this option?

Block the middle and use the front feed (the VCT one) and then restrict the rear feed according to the table.

Cheers

Gary

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/222706-oil-restriction/#findComment-4001986
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I posted about this before ages ago....you can use copper mig tips...just find the size that has the correct hole diameter you want and machine it down or cut it down to suit. Pretty sure most std mig tips are around a 1/4" OD.....actually i cant recall now...maybe it was about 7mm or 5/16"...either way it works :starwars:

Edited by r33_racer
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/222706-oil-restriction/#findComment-4062777
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

I am going to be using an RB25DE head without VVT.

Could I block the rear feed and use the RB30 1.8mm front restrictor without filling the catch can with too much blow by?

Car will be used for daily duties, towing & the odd 1/4 run

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/222706-oil-restriction/#findComment-4116336
Share on other sites

You could and it would be fine.

However at this point in time, if I were to do it again I would restrict both down to 1.5mm and run a nice catch can setup that drains to the sump.

The drain to the sump also works to vent the bottom end as a result the oil is able to flow from the head back to the bottom end considerably easier.

All though mine has had no issues the top end is noticeably noisier since performing the oil restriction mod on first start up when cold.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/222706-oil-restriction/#findComment-4116417
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

If the cold start-up noise is somehow related to the elimination of the rear feed, I can see the logic in retaining both feeds.

Here's a variation on the theme, using the idea that a single 1.5mm restrictor otherwise supplies enough volume during operation:

MIG tips are available with a 1.2mm orifice. Cross sectional area - 1.13 sq.mm

SK's preference of 1.5mm restrictor provides cross sectional area of 1.77 sq.mm

Install 1.2mm restrictor front and rear gives ~ 2.25 sq.mm so slightly more flow than 1 x 1.5 but way less than 2 x 1.8 or 2.0mm as stock. Similar end result and maybe avoid the issues Cubes identified.

Could be wide of the mark and solely related to hydraulic lifters but worth raising.

Comments?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/222706-oil-restriction/#findComment-4167913
Share on other sites

Dale would the flow be reduced further again due to increased friction losses as a result of the smaller hole? In other words the cross sectional area is not 'directly' related to flow? i.e 2 sq.mm would not flow 2x that 1 sq.mm?

I have NFI when it comes to this but visualising flow through a smaller pipe suggests so.

A friend fitted 2 x 1.1's to his and it tapped its arse off. :S

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/222706-oil-restriction/#findComment-4168291
Share on other sites

I also have little idea of fluid dynamics, but the restrictor is just that - an orifice rather than a tube. So restriction would be causing the reduction in flow rather than friction I would think.

All the same I don't want too much in-depth analysis but threw up the idea given your start up noise. If it is lifter noise only then maybe not a problem. I've heard from more than one source that using a 10W60 oil is an important part of the equation of making this setup work optimally.

Interesting to hear that your mate with 2 x 1.1 restrictors had problems with noisy lifters.

So at the least it appears to be important to stick with SK's guide and go 1 x 1.5mm and a bung in the rear?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/222706-oil-restriction/#findComment-4168655
Share on other sites

Well... 10w60 next oil change it is then.

I'll let you know how it goes. :/

I should mention nothings broke with a little bit of noise on start up. Its now been a year since the turbo and restrictors have gone in and travelled a good 25k. There was no real wear on the lifters etc when I pulled them out recently to drop in a new set of cams.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/222706-oil-restriction/#findComment-4168676
Share on other sites

Sticking with the general theme of the thread, who can share experiences regarding oil pump spec and restrictor sizes regarding lifter bleed out? Clearly this relates to 30/25 with a non-Neo head.

I'd presume very few of us would be running dedicated track cars with this setup, so quiet/smooth operation is still high on the list of priorities. ie. I want to avoid bleed out due to too much reduction in oil delivery to the top end.

My setup is

25DE oil pump (stock)

non VVT head

internal oil drain-backs in head + block drilled oversize to 9.5mm

restrictors 1.6mm (F) 1.2mm ®

and (hopefully) catch can with drain-to-sump

engine speed < 7000rpm

application: road, motorkhana, club sprint

Edited by Dale FZ1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/222706-oil-restriction/#findComment-4181500
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...