Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi skyliners!

It would appear as though an autosparky has done something that has broken some unknown thing in my car. Can ANYONE help?

Problems started when my alarm went nuts and used to engage and immobilise the car when i was driving (yeah, not very fun), so i went to the local autosparky, and he said that alarms can go a bit mental with age, so i said just rip it out and put a new one in.

The car is a 93 r33gtst, and he put some standard alarm in, pretty basic, i didn't want anything complicated

When i went to pick the car up, it didn't start properly, and he said it might be flooded and just to give it some gas while starting, which i did, and it started. Since that day, the car has never started successfully first time using just the key (and no accelerator pedal).

My initial thought was that he'd not soldered something properly to the fuel pump or the alarm unit was faulty, so i took it back to him and asked him to check his work.

The symptoms currently are:

having to pump the accelerator to start.

usually cranks over about 5 secs or so, sounding like it isn't getting enough fuel

it takes 2-6 attempts to start (cold more so than hot, but even when recently stopped, takes more effort than it ever used to)

after getting car back the second time, would sometimes idle at about 2k for the first trip of the day

if i quickly do a u-turn, it'll often conk out, after revving, then taking foot off accelerator and also using powersteering...

Aside from this, the car drives well.

My battery was changed about 6 months ago, and was fully charged when tested and the alternator was rebuilt at the start of the year as well and is all good

So, when he had it the second time, i asked him to check the fuel pump and do an overall looking into. This is what he did:

fuel pump was ok... had enough pressure

pressure regulator was ok

coolant temp sensor was bung so he replaced

he got afm rebuilt (at a cost of bloody $300 bucks or something, but he did this before i knew about it... grrr)

all wiring he said was ok.

he said that when left overnight, the fuel pressure dropped, and said that it should maintain the pressure when left overnight. This sounds about right to my novice ears, cos the car feels as though it's just not getting enough juice when it starts. To me it feels like a fuel thing, but could well be the ecu, or whatever it is that controls the idling when under load etc.

I'm really not sure where to go with this. my knowledge is exhausted, but it's rather annoying that the car has always started first time everytime, and will now not ever start the first time.

Has anyone got any suggestions for what it could be or what i could try? my searching on these forums has pretty much just pointed to either fuel pump or afm, both of which appear to be fine...

Bad fuel pump.....?

Clogged fuel filter...?

Bad..or stuffed battery....?

Battery would be my first guess......You have had the alarm drain it a number of times....

Incorrect..or slightly lower power delivery can also cause this problem.

Hi guys,

I had a new batt put in, and the sparky had charged it when testing.

The fuel filter i changed before taking back to him the second time, and according to him the fuel pump was building enough pressure. I don't know enough about the fuel system to be able to diagnose this, but the sparky seemed convinced the pump is fine.

he also check spark plugs and coilpacks as well...

i'll check the AAC valve today while i'm home. i don't really know about this, but i'll search how to do it.

I'm thinking though, if it's a physical valve that controls the idle, if i'm starting the car with my foot flat on the accelerator, then wouldn't this valve be fully open anyway? (i don't even know what the AAC valve is, but i'll look it up right now).

when it's cranking over, the power sounds fine, i can hear the thing turning over, but it sounds and feels like it's not getting enough fuel, then when it finally gets enough, it comes to life.

very confusing, but geez it's annoying! my poor car used to start first time every time!

Geez thats a weird one....my first guess would be for some reason there is too much resistance between ignition and immobiliser.

Check voltage each side of the immobiliser.

Although as you said it does drive ok, so fuel system would be my next stop.

Before all else, try an ecu reset...disconnect battery, apply brake pedal for a minute or 2, reconnect battery start, let idle for 10-15 min then go for a thrash. Possibly when the ecu was last disconnected (battery) it probably wasn't given time enough on start up to re-learn its sheet properly on idle.

Edited by madbung
  • 2 weeks later...

Ok, this is strange...

After last weekend (didn't drive anywhere on sun), come monday morning, i had remembered the sparky saying something about the diff between having the coolant temp sensor plugged in and not, so i popped the bonnet and unplugged it, turned the key, and voila! instant start with barely cranking a second time! no foot on the pedal and no multiple attempts.

SO... i drove to work ok, went to park, did a U-turn quickly, and in the process (like has often randomly been happening lately), the thing stalls, but i was pretty much in place, BUT, the thing wouldn't start! tried 8 times to start the car, opened the bonnet and plugged sensor back in and it started!

Anyway, long story short, i tried again yest, and same story, started fine, but then after filling up with petrol that night, wouldn't start until sensor plugged back in.

??

AND that's not the worst of it. Now, most of the tiem when i drive, when it starts to build boost, it shudders and feels like it's shakey and losing power, so needless to say as soon as i feel that i ease off the accelerator.

it's not all the time, sometimes only at the start of the journey, sometimes only at the end. tonight after work was the whole way home.

anybody have any ideas? is my ecu screwed or something? any help would be awesome, cos this is completely beyond my small brain...

ooh.

been doing more searching. anyone got any comments?

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Wh...&hl=shudder

i DID do a gentle wash on top of the engine i think last weekend. (by gentle i mean had oil there, so sprayed degreaser, then tissues to mop up, then tipped waterbottle over it..)

and http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Ca...&hl=shudder

the sparky said he tested fuel pump, coilpacks & regulator. but seeing that he possibly broke something in the first place... should i go and check any of these things?

ooh.

been doing more searching. anyone got any comments?

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Wh...&hl=shudder

i DID do a gentle wash on top of the engine i think last weekend. (by gentle i mean had oil there, so sprayed degreaser, then tissues to mop up, then tipped waterbottle over it..)

and http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Ca...&hl=shudder

the sparky said he tested fuel pump, coilpacks & regulator. but seeing that he possibly broke something in the first place... should i go and check any of these things?

Would seem the replacement temp sensor was faulty - the ECU thinks the engine is hot, when it's actually cold. So tries to start a "hot" engine.

You need to reconnect the sensor after the engine starts, otherwise the ECU always thinks the engine is cold, and dumps fuel in there - fuel economy -> crap.

Ok, so i went to check my coil packs and spark plugs today, and when pulling things apart, rather obvious, was the fact that the autosparky has cracked the metal frame that the coilpacks screw into (i'll attempt to add pic). And because i had given the top of the engine a light clean last weekend, degreaser and water had gotten in though the crack, and was pooled around the sparkplug in cylinder 3 (from the front). before going any further, i used paper towel to soak up any moisture i could get to so that it didn't just empty into the cylinder as i removed the sparkplug.

Q: Will i have to try and get this fixed/replaced? or can i just go along, knowing that i can't get water in there?

Next thing: The spark plugs i pulled out were all pretty much black, and the 3rd one was wet (which i knew was going to happen due to the events above). I noticed that most of the spark plugs weren't screwed in very hard at all, and were possibly loose. I'll pick up some new ones 2mo just to eliminate them as a prob.

While i had things open, so i measured the resistance of the coilpacks. I hadn't done this before, but i think i did it right. resistance from the front cylinder to the back were as follows:

12.5

12.1

11.7

12.8

12.3

12.8

Does this look ok?

So, what should i do next folks? i'm leaving the plugs out overnight just so things can dry up properly...

any help would be greatly appreciated.

:laugh:

ps. pic of the spark plugs is closest plug to front of car at right side of pic. rest in order...

post-9354-1214642569_thumb.jpg

post-9354-1214642613_thumb.jpg

post-9354-1214642641_thumb.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...