Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 120
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Originally posted by adam 32

how would you bring boost on earlier with a more agressive timing curve? surely it will still flow the same amount of exhaust gas therefore the turbo will always spooll at 4K?

Ask steve @ sst. I wont be going down the drags till I have the wolf3d in and tuned. Dont see the point in going until the car's setup right, plus my tyres are hitting about 12 months in age, although not completely lacking in tread I'm sure they wont be as good as new ones but I'll still give them a try. I think my stock ecu is ****ed, in the mornings (cold or not) the car searches up and down, sometimes to the point of stalling but doesnt quite and then finally settles on about 1500rpm till it warms up and then sits around 650rpm, sometimes the car idle is lumpy too, but I think thats spark plug related.

Originally posted by rob77

I think my stock ecu is ****ed, in the mornings (cold or not) the car searches up and down, sometimes to the point of stalling but doesnt quite and then finally settles on about 1500rpm till it warms up and then sits around 650rpm.

Mine does that. Grant told me what it was. Can't remember now, something is a little out of calibration. Computers not f#cked.

Originally posted by Hicks

Mine does that. Grant told me what it was. Can't remember now, something is a little out of calibration. Computers not f#cked.

Mine does the hunting thing too on cold startup every now and then.. I find a tap of right foot seems to sort it out pronto tho..

Robbie i dont think you will reduce your lag marginally with an exhaust manifold change

Your kidding yourself, the ex housing is too big and the efficiancy range is way off what boost your stock internals can handle

Im guessing 100rpm better spoolup with the manifold. maybe 100 rpm more with the tuned computer but even that is optimistic

down the drags you poofs

Originally posted by caminperth

Any ideas when I can use those tickets you gave me rev?

At "The Clink" in freo, this friday night. Event starts at 10pm goes to 1am or so. I may or may not be presiding over part of the nights event, subject to my wife being there. :)

Originally posted by macka

Your kidding yourself, the ex housing is too big and the efficiancy range is way off what boost your stock internals can handle

The stock internals are pretty strong, the problem is the RB25 compression is a tad too high to start with.

Rob's got a 'cadbury turbo', a bar and a half of full boost.....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • This is for an RB20DET. Sorry for not including that. 
    • Welp, this is where my compression lands after my rebuild. Thoughts? I have ~6 hours on the motor. 
    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
×
×
  • Create New...