Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi guys. im sorry if this is on the wrong section but i couldnt find it anywhere and thought i would just put it in here.

if people could just put down what they have done for weight reduction of any form that would be very helpfull.

also the benefits of for example a lightened flywheel

thankyou

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/229769-weight-reduction/
Share on other sites

Only use weight reduction measures seriosuly for trackdays or drags.

Take out back seat, spare wheel, subs, anything heavy, carbon fibre bonnet, half tank fuel.

Light weight rims make a big difference in speed also.

oh ok.. well what about a lightened flywheel., how much can that cost and what are the benifits

oh ok.. well what about a lightened flywheel., how much can that cost and what are the benifits

They are about $400 odd.

The benefits is that the engine will rev out quicker as there is less unsprung mass bearing down upon the engine.. Same thing goes for lightened drive shafts.

Down side off lightened flywheels is that its harder to get the car off the line quickly and is easier to stall. Another down side is that a lightened flywheel can't cope with high temperatures and can develop stress fractures and this can transfer over to the clutch.

In terms of weight saving.. how hardcore do you wanna go? On top of what DR180 said.. you can also remove;

Sound deadening

Power steering

Air con

power windows

audio items

fibreglass quarter panels

fixed back carbonfiber/kevlar/fiberglass race seats

choped reo bars

Edited by GTS4WD

There isn't much you can remove/lighten without a compromise. I mean safety/defects/expense/extra noise

IMO only take the above advice (it's all correct) if you're serious about circuit/drag and have some dollars to spend on lighter parts. The heavy bits are up front, but are expensive to replace (bonnet, fenders, engine components). SO removing too much from the rear (speakers, spare, tool bag, boot trim, rear seat, wing etc) will worsen the weight distribution. Expect less grip where it's needed most.

A fair few people here have returned their flywheels back to stock after going lightened. It's annoying to drive on the roads.

IMO the best thing for a street car is try not to ADD weight, as a minimum.

Hope you work it out mate. Cheers :rofl:

Edited by R338OY
hi guys. im sorry if this is on the wrong section but i couldnt find it anywhere and thought i would just put it in here.

if people could just put down what they have done for weight reduction of any form that would be very helpfull.

also the benefits of for example a lightened flywheel

thankyou

what car are you working off as the base?

ay guys sorry to but in but whilst talking about weight distro i guessed wouldnt mind, i am thinking of dyno matting the boot space entirely to improve sub sound and kill road noise a bit do you recon that its worth the effort and $$$

Depends how badly you want to increase the sound.

dude just eat less... im lucky to be not a massive guy (175cms, 55kg) so that helps :(

not a massive guy? lol at that weight your not half a massive guy, lol...

Some thing thats not mentioned so much here that ill add, is that rotating weight means more than static weight (static weight being dead weight held by suspension, and rotating being, engine/drive train)

So lighter wheels, drive shaft, clutch, flywheel, balencer, even crank/rods/pistons all make a big difference. As for lightened flywheels being undrivable? I think the opposite, i love my light flywheel, makes down shift throttle blips so quick, effortless and smooth, car revs quicker etc. No problems with stalling etc, might be more noticed on laggier turbo cars etc, also depends on your gearing etc (i have fairly short gearing for a 3L @ 3.9:1). Lightweight wheels make a big difference also, even brakes....

what was mentioned with the weight distribution is correct, but you can change your suspension accordingly to suit. I don't have a spare or jack etc, i run an rb20det gearbox (lighter than 25det) but have my battery in my boot to help out distribution (if its a 32) you could also get a lighter battery. Less fuel in the tank, pretty much anything else you can look at and replace with some thing lighter or remove all together, sound deadening/carpet, aircon condenser + radiator, shit behind dash, stereo gear, replace window glass, exhaust, windscreen washer and full radiator overflow, whatever floats your boat.

but remember, theres not tooo much of a gain with removing static weight you'll be able to shed, so its about compromises for performance vs comfort, for example, its a bit of work but you can probably take over 20kg of sound deadening/carpet/underlay just out of the cabin, but do you want the noise and vibration?

unless its dedicated track or your going for broke, I'd leave it stock appart from easily removable items, like rear seat (that you can put back in), and lightened drive train, if thats what your into.

Another down point of lightened flywheels is that you will get less engine brake when chaning down gears..

This may sound massively pedantic, but what you have said is not 100% correct.

Basically a heavier flywheel needs more energy to increase its rpm relative to a lighter unit.

So when you change down a gear it will INITIALLY give you more engine braking.

However after that point it will give you less engine braking because its greater stored energy (kinetic energy - again relative to a lighter unit) needs to be soaked up by engine friction & braking etc.

So basically a heavier flywheel will absorb more energy to get it up to speed, but then give it back when you try and brake.

As an aside that means when you don't change down gears a lightened flywheel will increase your braking performance. :(

As an aside that means when you don't change down gears a lightened flywheel will increase your braking performance. :)

Under braking.. the force of the wheels slowing down Via braking) is greater than the force of ineria and gravity acting on the the flywheel to slow it down..

So the force of the brakes slowing the the car and hence the engine, as it is in gear, will over come the force of the flywheel attempting to slow the engine down..

And besides.. its easier to stop/slow down a rotating object of less mass than one with more.

hmmm i think the easiest way to describe the gts4 in my shed is what is in it rather than what isnt in it,

interior wise,

a seat

2 seat rails

3 pedals

a handbrake

a gear lever

a steering column and wheel

1 seat belt.

the dash board has been hollowed out to a shell of it's former self leaving only the things required by law, i e the fan to the windscreen, indicator stalk, light switch, hazard light switch, window wiper switch and gauges. oh and a horn.

doesnt have a roll cage yet

under the car

all components related to the suspension and drive line,

all plastic and anything bolted to the chassis that doesnt help performance is gone.

the bumpers are fibre glass skins with no subframes, the bonnet is the same, along with the gaurds and side skirts,

im currently saving for fibreglass rear qauters and may skin the doors if i can find sombody who can do them.

so far it has gone from a curb wieght of 1420 kgs down to 1158 kgs.

i think if this was done to a gtst it would be even lighter not having the 4wd system.

Under braking.. the force of the wheels slowing down Via braking) is greater than the force of ineria and gravity acting on the the flywheel to slow it down..

So the force of the brakes slowing the the car and hence the engine, as it is in gear, will over come the force of the flywheel attempting to slow the engine down..

And besides.. its easier to stop/slow down a rotating object of less mass than one with more.

I have no idea what you are trying to say. Something about gravity, right? :)

Braking friction & engine friction (or pumping losses if you like) both act to remove energy from the car & hence slow it down.

The kinetic energy of the flywheel constitutes part of the energy needing removal.

The less kinetic energy a car has (for a given speed) the easier it is to slow down.

A lighter flywheel stores less kinetic energy....

If you are changing gears (either up or down) you are simply trading some linear kinetic energy (ie of the car going forward) for some rotational kinetic energy (ie the flywheel going around). All of the energy (whether linear or rotational) needs to be gotten rid of to slow the car (assuming it is in gear). The advantage of the lightened flywheel is less energy is needed to spin up what is ultimately a useless piece of junk and can instead go into making the car go quicker in a straight line.

Anyway the heirachy of dealing with weight goes in the following order.

1. Reduce unsprung weight.

2. Reduce the inertia of any rotating components.

3. Reduce static weight.

4. Relocate weight, ie lower, away from the more heavilly loaded axle and closer to the middle of the car.

Basically item 1 is the most important & then in descending order items 2, 3 & 4. At the end of the day, though, you do what you can.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The trigger kit I have is similar to the one in the link below. While going through Facebook, I saw someone else mention a similar issue, and I’m starting to think this could be related to the crank gear itself. I understand these parts are CNC machined, but maybe some earlier versions or individual pieces might have slight inconsistencies—it just doesn’t look right in my case. https://www.facebook.com/share/16an8evZd9/?mibextid=wwXIfr I originally installed the crank gear using the thin OEM washer, but as shown in the attached photo, the timing belt walks very close to the edge. When I tried using a Nitto washer—which is thicker—it actually made the issue worse. The belt walks about 1mm off the front edge, which raises more concern about alignment.   I’ve gone through the full process of elimination:   The tensioner pulley and bolt are brand new and installed correctly. The bolt isn’t bent and is oriented properly. The back of the tensioner and the idler pulley are clean and seated correctly. The idler sits slightly more forward, which I understand is due to its design. I’ve experimented with both tight and loose belt tension, but it makes no difference. As soon as the engine runs, the belt immediately walks forward again—even if I reset it beforehand.     At this point, I’m considering replacing the crank gear with your Race Version 1 (12-tooth), but before purchasing, I wanted to ask:   Are you aware of any alignment issues when using this gear? Would this gear help keep the belt aligned correctly, or could the walking still occur? Does it work with a standard missing-tooth crank and rear washer? Is there any specific crank setup or install procedure required?     For reference, I’m not using a front washer, as the PRP crank gear seems to replace the need for one.   Looking forward to your advice.
    • Yep, looks that way. Never driven an E30 or R31 so I can only imagine  
    • Yuh, My new R34 box is sitting on the workshop floor (in its large shipping box, which is a nice thing on its own), along with a front plate to convert to push clutch. There was no way I was interested in rebuilding my existing one. Was only partly interested in the risk of buying a used one. But, if you want a 2nd hander, I can point you to one in/near Melbourne at least. @Komdotkom has one that should be in good enough condition to be usable. I don't think it's in a for sale thread, you'd have to message him. @redzedhas one that definitely needs a rebuild.
    • I used to love going to Amaroo to watch the HQ series go for broke (eventually stopped due to lack of spare parts) and also the Porsche series.  It was so cool to back your car up to nearly the edge of the viewing barrier and party with your friends, having a bbq and alcoholic/non drinks. It was such a family/mates atmosphere
×
×
  • Create New...