Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

lol... Spend one day in Whore Town. We will call that your initiation :google:

Then... you will be corrupt lol

Oh, im already corrupt. Just let me settle in a bit.

maybe i have shared too much already in previous posts?....

Nah all is cool. U guys dont scare me a bit.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/231192-new-here/page/6/#findComment-4064040
Share on other sites

  • Replies 125
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Welcome Danielle

I just skimmed this thread and its got topic touching on teh ghey, teh orgies and teh rumors started already, much like Whorington McTowningsworth

Chicks only look hot in EVO's, go get yourself an 8 :google:

Edited by Topaz
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/231192-new-here/page/6/#findComment-4064289
Share on other sites

Oh hai missdee! Welcome! :woot:

So seeing as we have seen your prettiful tatts... how about enlightening us with a picture of what you actually look like! I'll show you mine if you show me yours ;)

Yep sounds good. Kel and I have our pics on our profile. Where's ur avatar too?? u should use ur pic of ur tat at ur avatar :P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/231192-new-here/page/6/#findComment-4064376
Share on other sites

Tom, Riley's on Main St in Osborne Park is heaps good, they're one of he best in WA :P

Ah, thanks Mel, I live NoR and work in Ossy Park so probably a better option for me. Thanks any Dee.

Found there website too - http://www.reillytat2.com/About%20us%20Page.htm

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/231192-new-here/page/6/#findComment-4064402
Share on other sites

Ah, thanks Mel, I live NoR and work in Ossy Park so probably a better option for me. Thanks any Dee.

Found there website too - http://www.reillytat2.com/About%20us%20Page.htm

yeah they're really good!!! Really clean and nice as well

Awww the new girl doesn't want to play with us :P *throws the ball to Mel*

*throws ball back to Kel* I think we scared her Kel, she doesn't realise that we're the 'cool kids' here!! But then again, photo-chopping does take time LOL *personal joke* just kiddin! Everyone chill

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/231192-new-here/page/6/#findComment-4064419
Share on other sites

Oh hai missdee! Welcome! :P

So seeing as we have seen your prettiful tatts... how about enlightening us with a picture of what you actually look like! I'll show you mine if you show me yours :woot:

Sorry guys been late night shopping.

I will try and get together a photo of myself, give me a couple of weeks for photo chopping LOL! and it should be ready. nah, i will c what i can do.

hey Mel, what Skyline you after?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/231192-new-here/page/6/#findComment-4064722
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...