Jump to content
SAU Community

Dsi Or Splitfire?

Nero_Tigre

By Nero_Tigre,
in Engines & Forced Induction

 Share

Recommended Posts

Nero_Tigre Enthusiast

Nero_Tigre

Posted
Posted

Hi i was wondering if anyone knows which is better DSI (direct spark ignition) or SPLITFIRE ignition coils. Ive been told by a few people that they are pretty much the same, however, the DIS's are a fair bit cheaper. I'd like to get some oppinions before i go buy so any input would be much appreciated.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/231839-dsi-or-splitfire/
Share on other sites
Amec Experienced

Amec

Posted
Posted
I got splitfires in the GTR, they don't really seem any different to standard coils but do look a lot better than standards

Standard coils do the job fine though, theres a few RB26s around making 350kw + on standard coils

INFOMERCIAL WARNING

you are correct, Splitfires wont make any performance improvement over functioning standard coils.

Superspark coilpacks on the other hand, WILL improve the performance. which of course we can get you.

check out www.superspark.com.au and if you are interested we retail them for $499.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • GTSBoy
      Best place to order Authetic R32 Parts in Japan

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • GTSBoy
      Ethanol Content Sensor - Always at 11%?

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • GTSBoy
      Blue slip

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
    • GTSBoy
      Blue slip

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      Yes they do. For some maybe. But for those used the most by abusers, ie Skylines, the numbers are known. The stock eyebrow height for R32/3 Skylines is about 365/375mm or thereabouts. The minimum such heights are recorded in adjacent columns in the database.
    • soviet_merlin
      Ethanol Content Sensor - Always at 11%?

      By soviet_merlin · Posted

      Hmmm, interesting. Makes me wonder whether there is bias as well. It's the cheapest fuel, so it is used for all kinds of ill-maintained shitboxes which are bound to have issues regardless. Nicer cars tend to require higher octane rated fuel and can't use it anyway. FWIW, the official NSW E10 facts page is decent. 
×
×
  • Create New...