Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

ok im getting said turbo and i want to know if anyone can tell me the following:

a) are you using the .63 or .84 exhaust housing? im thinking .84 too big.

B) what engine mods you have?

c) what rpm full boost is at?

d) what boost you are running?

e) rwkw?

slowly making my way through this thread but no luck as yet http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Rb...no-t103095.html

Cheers Adam

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/232196-rb20-with-gt3071r/
Share on other sites

Found only one from the whole thread

1990 r32 gtst

gt3071r

550cc injectors

walbro fuel pump

tuneagent exhaust manifold

full exhaust system with custom dump

just jap cooler with custom piping

sm4 autronic ecu

stock internals

the car made 248.7rwkw but its now tuned at 241.4rwkw

ill try and post up dyno sheet but my scanner is playing up.

Search is pathetic, doesnt even complete it...

Would be good to see a graph of this. I'm thinking .84 is too big too. RB25 gets decent boost at 3500 with a .63 Maybe a little more.

Got a 0.63 on mine (RB25). Pushing about 5 psi by 2000 rpm, full boost (18psi) by about 3100 rpm. Great response, but has a issue with boost creep; the housing seems to just be too small on these things. Having said that, you may have more luck on an RB20. :D

I'd put a picture up, but the uploads arent working :huh:

Got a 0.63 on mine (RB25). Pushing about 5 psi by 2000 rpm, full boost (18psi) by about 3100 rpm. Great response, but has a issue with boost creep; the housing seems to just be too small on these things. Having said that, you may have more luck on an RB20. :D

I'd put a picture up, but the uploads arent working :huh:

wat power figure u making?? mid 200's??

cheers

LOL, so many people ask questions etc about this sort of setup then we never see the results :D

It cant be that much different then a TD06 setup, so will be laggy but have decent enough response and power from 4,000rpm on up. But since noone canb give you real life results then you will end up being a guinea pig to some extent.

So 0.63, its easier to live with too small and choked up top, then laggy SOB that never makes the power it should. You can also port/extrude hone the smaller out to suit the engine.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Version 1 aluminium airbox is.......not acceptable No pics as I "didn't like the look.....alot" Even after all my "CAD", and measurements, the leg near the fusebox just didn't sit right as it ended up about 10mm long and made the angle of the dangle look wrong, the height was a little short as well, meh, I wasn't that confident that Version 1 was going to be an instant winner I might give Version 2 another go, there's plenty of aluminium at work, but, after having in on and off a few times, and laying in the old OEM airbox without the new pod filter and MAF, there may be an option to modify the OEM air box and still use the Autoexe front cover and filter.... maybe This >  Needs to fit in here, but using the panel, and not the pod, the MAF will need to fit in the airbox though> I'm thinking as the old OEM box and Autoexe cover that is sitting in the shed is just sitting around doing nothing, and they are relatively abundant and cheap to replace if I mess it up and need another, it may well fit with some modifications to how the Autoexe brackets mounts to the rad support, and some dremiling to move it get in there, should give me some more room for activities, as I don't want to move the MAF and affect the tune Sealing the hole it requires to stick it in the air box is simple, a tight fit and some pinch weld will seal it up tight  I am calling this a later problem though
    • and it ends up being already priced in as though you're just on 91RON without any ethanol. Car will lose a bit of economy as the short and long term fuel trims bring down the AFR back to stoich or whatever it is for cruise/idle for the engine.  
    • Oh, you are right. But, in Australia E10 is based on 91RON fuel and ends up being 94RON. Hence it being the cheaper option for economy cars. The more performance oriented cars go for the 98RON fuel that has no ethanol mixed in. The only step up we have left then at some petrol stations is E85.
    • There is a warning that "this thread is super old" but they ignore that anyway...
    • With 10% Ethanol, we're talking 2-3% fuel consumption difference. The emissions reductions and octane boost in my opinion far outweigh this almost non existent loss.    My tanks sitting at 80%. Luckily that should go down fast as I'm on vacation again for the next two weeks. 
×
×
  • Create New...