Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Was curious how much power can be made using the standard head and cams, reason being that im going to rebuild my motor so it will survive some higher boost and was wondering will the standard head flow good enough to see some good power readings with out dropping valves or other nasty things.

ie, a standard head is good for up to 280 atwkw

or, my head dropped all its valves into the pots and the world ended at 350 kw with a loud bang followed by some rattling until all was quite bar the trickling sound of coolant on the garage floor.

Thanks for any info guys and girls.

MLR

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/233609-stock-25-head/
Share on other sites

270rwkw/17psi (dyno Dynamics) GT30 (600hp) on PULP

370rwkw/24psi @ Autosalon (mainline dyno), GT30 (600hp) on Sunoco 104 and LOTS of extra timing :P

Everyone always said my set-up felt great when in the car. So i dont think i was lacking by having a stock head/cams at all.

Certainly was quick and did the numbers. Boost was on ~4000rpm @ both levels.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/233609-stock-25-head/#findComment-4095483
Share on other sites

+1 for twincam 30 :)

My 25DE head made 365rwkw in its' previous life through standard intake manifold, standard throttlebody and standard cams.

that is sick! I cant wait to get my cooler welded so i can retune the focker

Stock 25de head on 3ltr making 260kw at the moment, plan on getting it to the mid 300's :bunny:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/233609-stock-25-head/#findComment-4098747
Share on other sites

Yeah we figured the throttlebody was the limiting factor there, it just wouldn't make anymore power.. that was at 22psi through a pair of 2540's.

I'm going custom forward facing, q45 throttlebody and GT35R.. might chirp 2nd :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/233609-stock-25-head/#findComment-4098776
Share on other sites

Yeah we figured the throttlebody was the limiting factor there, it just wouldn't make anymore power.. that was at 22psi through a pair of 2540's.

I'm going custom forward facing, q45 throttlebody and GT35R.. might chirp 2nd :)

haha yeah thats pretty much what i have at the moment but stock tb, thinking of changing it to a custom billet one in the near future though...

In a 32 you wont even use second mate, I am frying 2nd in a R33 with fat stickies on the back @ 260!!! 3ltr torque FTMFW!

Edited by dano4127
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/233609-stock-25-head/#findComment-4098823
Share on other sites

^^ that would probably be the 2540's more than anything... such a nasty turbo :blink:

Nah same turbos are on the new motor (30 with a 25T head, greddy plenum, q45 t/b) and making 540awhp at 1.4bar (~20.6psi), so it was definately something on the intake side that was restricting it.

Dan, that's what I'm hoping for :)

Edited by bubba
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/233609-stock-25-head/#findComment-4099175
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
    • @GTSBoy yeah sorry i know thery are known for colors bud those DBA are too in colors 🙂 Green will be good enough for me  
    • That's my life. Past-Duncan has a lot to answer for
×
×
  • Create New...