Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Had it tuned on Sat.

HKS GT-SS's

Sard 800cc inj

Nismo in tank pump

Z32 AFM's

PFC

CES dumps, 3in twin front pipes, 3.5in cat back

Jim Berry clutch

JJR intercooler hard pipe kit

Made 361awhp @ 18psi

feels gooooood. :(

Edited by Andy D
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/234192-260rs-with-gt-ss/
Share on other sites

Had it tuned on Sat.

HKS GT-SS's

Sard 800cc inj

Nismo in tank pump

Z32 AFM's

PFC

CES dumps, 3in twin front pipes, 3.5in cat back

Jim Berry clutch

JJR intercooler hard pipe kit

Made 361awhp @ 18psi

feels gooooood. :huh:

good stuff. post up the graph?

Thought about cam gears, but I like the fat low-mid range and am not really chasing peak power. Not sure if they'd make much difference for what I'm after.

Yeah, it was Stu (and friend) who installed all the parts, and did the tune.

He did an awesome job, and is a top bloke as well. I couldn't thank him enough.

post-36640-1220257894_thumb.jpg

Hey Guys,

i got my 260 tuned the other day after running it in after the rebuild.

Basics of the work, full forged internals, sump and rocker baffles, oil restrictor, Sard Injectors, malpassi fuel reg, in tank walbro feeding 2 litre swirl tank then to 044 bosch external, Garrett 2860rs-5 turbos, ems 8860 computer running 20psi it made 420rwhp (313rwkw)

Need to get a set of splitfires to increase the spark then we'll wind it up to 22psi and hopefully reach mid 320's at the wheels, that way completely ensuring it has 300awkw.

congrats on your newly acquired power. How much did you spent on total?

I was planning on the same mod myself but i have to scrap it cos im being restationed overseas. Will have to wait till i get back in oz.

How does the Jim berry's clutch feel? Any hard slamming like a sledge hammer?

Yudy

Very nice work Grim. How did you manage the rwkw figure? (front driveshaft out?)

Jim Berry clutch is a rebuilt factory item. Slightly shorter travel than standard but really smooth (wife can easily drive it).

Nice work guys. It inspires me to begin the mods to mine :)

How do you find the GT-SSs? Not too laggy?

From my knowledge, the GTSS is just right for it. Probably you are refering to the GTRS. That will be too laggy.

Yeah I know the GTRS is laggy as all hell, but the GT-SSs are still going to be slightly laggy. I was wondering how they compare with stock turbos. I really wouldn't want much more lag than stock. The stockers can support another power for what I would want, it's just a shame the turbine wheels are ceramic, otherwise I'd keep them.

Hey Andy,

Yeah dropped the front shaft and pulled the fuses then ran it in rwd as my tuner only has a rwd dyno, waiting to sort a few things then will drop it back into 4wd, i must say, 313kw in rear wheel drive is ALOT of fun though, the "wow did you see that volvo go sideways" looks i get are pure GOLD! :D

Mine with the 2860rs's isnt too laggy, real boost starts to come on by 3500rpm, then acheives full boost by around 4200rpm, so it comes on fairly hard. Its even more fun when it hits peak torque around 6000rpm and breaks traction in all but 5th gear! lol!

GT-SS's feel like they spool up just as fast as the stockers. Don't have exact rpm numbers, but by seat of the pants they are very impressive. Almost feels like a big cube NA motor.

My old RB20 with 450hp bb turbo, had lag. These are light years ahead.

Do miss the sudden boost hit and manic wheel spin though, (damn ATESSA, sometimes i wish i had a switch to turn that off)

Hmm been reading this with interest as i went for the 2860-7's as i wanted the response (there the same as GT-SS??). I wanted 300rwkw with them, might get it. Mine's a built motor with cams, so hopefully be responsive. Will know shortly.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
×
×
  • Create New...