Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yesterday went to Turbotune in Adelaide to fix a spluttering problem my car has had for a while. Thought it could be either a fuel pump problem or a coilpack. After an hour and some tests, ended up being a faulty coil pack. So happy to get that fixed coz it was driving me crazy. Then we dynoed it and I was shocked to see 201.2rwkw. Only mods are dump/front pipe, hks cat back, fmic, no boost controller but there was a boost increase to around 11.5psi. I was wondering if anybody made similar sort of power with or without boost controller. Will put picture of dyno when I get a chance to scan.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/235496-dynoed-my-r33/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

to me that dyno is reading a wee bit too high

i had my car dynoed at Willall Racing and they use a mainline dyno

with a front mount, boost increase to 9psi, full zorst, splitfire coilpacks, pod....my car made 188.7 rwkw on a reasonably warm day

so from the mods that you are saying you have i would expect the same sort of power that my car has pulled out

plus no boost controller and ur hitting 11.5psi....umm have you had that reading out off a boost gague or from the stock gauge.

Edited by Krishy
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/235496-dynoed-my-r33/#findComment-4123368
Share on other sites

damo had 2 dyno results from 2 different places.....

autosalon dyno if i remember correctly he made 161 something rwkw

and at southern hi tech dyno he made 184.2rwkw

that alone tells you that every dyno is different

Edited by Krishy
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/235496-dynoed-my-r33/#findComment-4123473
Share on other sites

Only mods are dump/front pipe, hks cat back, fmic, no boost controller but there was a boost increase to around 11.5psi. I was wondering if anybody made similar sort of power with or without boost controller. Will put picture of dyno when I get a chance to scan.

You WOULD have about 200rwkw if there was an aftermarket computer or your ecu has been remapped........

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/235496-dynoed-my-r33/#findComment-4123484
Share on other sites

my 33 made 192kw with just a pod and turbo back three inch exhaust. i fitted the FMIC and it automatically pushed the boost up. final result is 205.4kw on 10psi :blink: ... i'm stoked:) oh and im running stock ECU and no boost controller

Edited by IZZMO 33
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/235496-dynoed-my-r33/#findComment-4123529
Share on other sites

Southern Hi Tech: 182.4rwkw

Autosalon: 165rwkw

I got the lighter wheels back on and have a dyno day at graham west next month. im very interested to see what it pulls now, although i may have a few goodies on by then so the comparison wont be that accurate.

At autosalon in 4th it was hitting speed cut on the ctock ecu but hadn't maxed the revs yet, but at southern hi teech it reached max revs, so i guess each dyno is calibrated differently.

Edited by Damo_R34
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/235496-dynoed-my-r33/#findComment-4123552
Share on other sites

my 33 made 192kw with just a pod and turbo back three inch exhaust. i fitted the FMIC and it automatically pushed the boost up. final result is 205.4kw on 10psi :blink: ... i'm stoked:) oh and im running stock ECU and no boost controller

same goes here, i achieved quite a boost increase after installing FMIC. Around 12psi. no aftermarket boost controller, and what appears to be the standard ECU. Same other mods that IZZMO mentioned - pod, turbo back exhaust.

She's running pretty nice.

Next thing i'll be adding is better coil packs - my oem ones are pretty fried.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/235496-dynoed-my-r33/#findComment-4123577
Share on other sites

Mainlines do read lower due to their more accurate correction factors but this is widely know, so you can compare DD figures to DD amd mainline to mainline but can't really compare them against eaach other.

I fitted the exhaust and cooler to this car, there was also some cat "modifications" so the boost increase is due to the increase in the exhaust flow.

The boost reading is off the MAP sensor on the exhaust.

I would say that the figure is pretty accutre due to how i only just pulled away in my lighter 180 which was running about 205kw(14.5psi) at the time when we had a run on the freeway on the way to Mallala (kept it under 110 of course).

As cubes and Jeff said prehaps it's just a freek.

Edited by D_Stirls
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/235496-dynoed-my-r33/#findComment-4123645
Share on other sites

Where there is a boost jump it should only jump to around 9 or 10psi. Most 33's do that with those mods, but I think there are some that just might do crazy things and jump to 11 or 12 psi like mine and I dont know why, maybe just lucky. Plus turbo tune had just finished having they're dyno serviced on monday, so dont think the dyno is a problem.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/235496-dynoed-my-r33/#findComment-4123646
Share on other sites

damo had 2 dyno results from 2 different places.....

autosalon dyno if i remember correctly he made 161 something rwkw

and at southern hi tech dyno he made 184.2rwkw

that alone tells you that every dyno is different

auto salon was dead on actually. i had just got my car dyno tuned at boost worx a week prior and it made 2kws more than it had been tuned for.

anywho.. i dont find it hard to believe 200. i mean 11.5 is lot of boost for a rb25.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/235496-dynoed-my-r33/#findComment-4123650
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah i found that alot of parts can be wrong or "very" hard to get the real right one. I already bought some brakes years ago on me "old" GT calipers and they were wrong too 😄  I told them too. Even send them pictures...but they said "EBC catalogue has them on my car... So i dont know what their answer will be. I call monday them and let them know that they are really not on my car. If they were they would be already on a car...
    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
×
×
  • Create New...