Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 114
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

hey gavperk i thought i knew everything about them but to be honest i cannot find anything on any BR current proceedings against Mark Pallister and anything about what you say.... could you provide details what court etc ...there were BR actions against Vanessa one of those were for school fees (Scots College) all actions were dismissed as well

I heard from office Mark in bankruptsy courts for million $ from not paying for a house and rent and school fees. lawyers chasing him big times. maybel this will do him down !
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/236437-quiktrak/page/5/#findComment-4751610
Share on other sites

hey gavperk i thought i knew everything about them but to be honest i cannot find anything on any BR current proceedings against Mark Pallister and anything about what you say.... could you provide details what court etc ...there were BR actions against Vanessa one of those were for school fees (Scots College) all actions were dismissed as well
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/236437-quiktrak/page/5/#findComment-4752484
Share on other sites

hey gavperk old news and not news at all the biggest news is happening next week

Something about a house he didn't pay for & rent he not paid. Told lawyers notices on bankrupcy arrived him recently with big bills to pay & million he being sued for Don't no more. Maybe Perth or Sydney?
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/236437-quiktrak/page/5/#findComment-4752534
Share on other sites

hey gavperk https://www.comcourts.gov.au/file/Federal/P...79/2005/actions

the house purchase was in 2004 and legal action was initiated against both Pallisters and both of them have been cleared with Vanessa cleared only in June of this year.

Whatever you say. Just know what told & papers arriving to bankrupt him Mark by person seeing them come about not paying for house
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/236437-quiktrak/page/5/#findComment-4757255
Share on other sites

hey gavperk https://www.comcourts.gov.au/file/Federal/P...79/2005/actions

the house purchase was in 2004 and legal action was initiated against both Pallisters and both of them have been cleared with Vanessa cleared only in June of this year.

Went your site. Don't look like it cleared to me. Person I talking too says lawyers papers always coming for others and this toSearch ResultsNew Search

NameFile NumberFile TitleApplicationFiling DateCourtRegistryStatus PALLISTER, MARKSYG2229/2008Phillip Baden Hearse & Anor v Mark PallisterBankruptcy 28-Aug-2008 FMCFED SydneyOpen#

Select a tab to search within that area.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/236437-quiktrak/page/5/#findComment-4759278
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi all,

Interesting reading. I am (or was) a shareholder in Quiktrak :):D .......Don't laugh I've lost a lot of hard earned money on the spin that the company put out. I held shares for a number of years. Does anybody know anything about proceedings against the company or any shareholder updates? Nothing has ever been given to us.

Thanks for your help!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/236437-quiktrak/page/5/#findComment-4795901
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

On Tuesday 17th November, Mark James Pallister has been declared bankrupt. He must resign all directorships and surrender his passport to the court appointed Trustee. He has been bought down through his own stupidity and arrogance by something small whereby he didn't read the fine print. This is no comfort to people he has ripped off, but it is a form of justice. (He has of course put money into his family trust - but bankruptcy will affect his ability to do business, travel and personal reputation seriously).

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/236437-quiktrak/page/5/#findComment-4941416
Share on other sites

On Tuesday 17th November, Mark James Pallister has been declared bankrupt. He must resign all directorships and surrender his passport to the court appointed Trustee. He has been bought down through his own stupidity and arrogance by something small whereby he didn't read the fine print. This is no comfort to people he has ripped off, but it is a form of justice. (He has of course put money into his family trust - but bankruptcy will affect his ability to do business, travel and personal reputation seriously).

I would like to say i am all for info to be put out on message boards but it should be correct and your information is not.

the matter to which you refer has been dismissed

IN THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES

COURT OF AUSTRALIA

AT SYDNEY

GENERAL DIVISION FILE NO: (P)SYG2229/2008

IN THE MATTER OF MARK PALLISTER

PHILLIP BADEN HEARSE AND ROBYN MIGNON HAYES HEARSE

APPLICANT

MARK PALLISTER

RESPONDENT

ORDER

BEFORE: REGISTRAR HEDGE

DATE: 17 November 2009

MADE AT: SYDNEY

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1. The Petition against the Respondent Debtor be dismissed.

2. The costs of the Applicant Creditor’s Phillip Baden Hearse and Robyn Mignon Hayes Hearse be fixed in the amount of $5,264.60 and paid out of the estate of the Respondent Debtor in the same priority as if a sequestration order had been made on the Petition.

3. A copy of this order be provided to the Official Receiver in Sydney within two days.

REGISTRAR

DATE THAT ENTRY IS STAMPED: 17 NOVEMBER 2009

Note:

Subsection 104 (2) of the Act [Federal Magistrates Court Act 1999] provides that a party to proceedings in which a Registrar has exercised any of the powers of the Court under subsection 102 (2), or under a delegation under subsection 103 (1), of the Act may, within the time prescribed by the Rules of Court, or within any further time allowed in accordance with the Rules of Court, apply to the Court to review that exercise of power.

Rule 2.03 [of the Federal Magistrates Court (Bankruptcy) Rules 2006] provides that, subject to any direction by the Court or a Federal Magistrate to the contrary, an application under subsection 104 (2) of the Act for review of the exercise of a power of the Court by a Registrar under subsection 102 (2), or under a delegation under subsection 103 (1), of the Act must be made by application for review within 21 days after the day on which the power was exercised. An applicant seeking a review can apply to a Federal Magistrate to waive the requirement that the application for review under subsection 104 (2) of the Act be made by application for review (see subrule 1.06 (1) of the Federal Magistrates Court Rules 2001).

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/236437-quiktrak/page/5/#findComment-4942302
Share on other sites

Always the spin hey. Come clean and admit it BANKRUPT is BANKRUPT!! Read the notice says "Mark James Pallister DOb 25.4.1965 - This person is an undischarged bankrupt". Its public records for anyone to see.

You do make me so ashamed all youve done

Doc9.doc

Doc9.doc

Edited by Justice To Others
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/236437-quiktrak/page/5/#findComment-4946238
Share on other sites

Always the spin hey. Come clean and admit it BANKRUPT is BANKRUPT!! Read the notice says "Mark James Pallister DOb 25.4.1965 - This person is an undischarged bankrupt". Its public records for anyone to see.

You do make me so ashamed all youve done

why didn't you post that in the first place and its not a free public record,you have to pay for it.

guess that leaves everyone with nothing to chase down now including the liquidator of Quiktrak Networks which is in lquidation

are you aware of any changes to the other corporate structures because Pallister is still a Director of DeadGuppy which is not allowed now and DG own the old Multitrak or Australian business with VixQuiktrak and the Australian Business has had a name change as well

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/236437-quiktrak/page/5/#findComment-4946553
Share on other sites

why didn't you post that in the first place and its not a free public record,you have to pay for it.

guess that leaves everyone with nothing to chase down now including the liquidator of Quiktrak Networks which is in lquidation

are you aware of any changes to the other corporate structures because Pallister is still a Director of DeadGuppy which is not allowed now and DG own the old Multitrak or Australian business with VixQuiktrak and the Australian Business has had a name change as well

VixQuiktrak no longer exists and VixTechnology no longer have anything to do with Quiktrak from the Quiktrak website

http://www.quiktrak.com.au/

Network Ownership

The QuikTrak network is now up and running under the new ownership of Quiktrak Security Pty. Ltd. As the new owners of this network, it is our priority to ensure the growth of this unique network and tracking service.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/236437-quiktrak/page/5/#findComment-4947068
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 5 months later...

and it is one product I WILL NOT be involved in. already spoke to a few of my customers that had the system installed and were less than impressed with it.

had quicktrak not pulled the pin and cost me a $60k council contract I may have a different tune.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/236437-quiktrak/page/5/#findComment-5322578
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...