Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys, after a recent track day, i went to check my pneumatic boost controller and noticed the bolt in the end of the controller had actually come out and was chilling down in a crevis in the engine bay (lucky as fark), anyway put it back in and tried it in a few positions, but didnt seem to go above around 10psi which is around stock in my car, as in that is a bout what id get if i just ran a vacuum line straight to the actuator without the bleed.

now only can think of one main thing:

when the bolt has come out, a small component has come out with it, i think it has a ball bearing and spring or something in it?? this is the controller here im talking about: http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/go...ntr-t73375.html

a few things to know:

it has recently had a new dump put on where it has a screamer for the wastegate, cant see how it would affect it.

the turbo is a stock R33 one on an RB20, using an RB20 actuator.

besides that i have nfi what ive done since the last time it was boosting up around 12-13psi as its been a while (was turned down a while back, also had to go through regency etc etc)

so yeh, any suggestions? is it possible for some components to fall out if the bolt isnt in screwed in?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/238331-cannot-boost-over-10psi/
Share on other sites

you've lost the ball bearing that goes under the spring and bolt. The ball bearing is the valve. Without it, its just a direct connection to the actuator, hence 10psi because its a 10psi actuator.

Also, this particular MBC doesn't bleed.

Edited by KeyMaker
you've lost the ball bearing that goes under the spring and bolt. The ball bearing is the valve. Without it, its just a direct connection to the actuator, hence 10psi because its a 10psi actuator.

Also, this particular MBC doesn't bleed.

x 2

the ball bearing is so tiny you would never find it anyway.

im selling one in parts for sale section if ur interested

you've lost the ball bearing that goes under the spring and bolt. The ball bearing is the valve. Without it, its just a direct connection to the actuator, hence 10psi because its a 10psi actuator.

Also, this particular MBC doesn't bleed.

thanks mate, that's what i thought i was, going by a bloke in that thread it was around 7mm in diametre so ill try and grab a BB and see how it goes. is that all, any other components that could have come out?

a spring will be between the ball bearing and the screw, too strong tension and the boost will be too high, too soft tension and fully wound in the boost controller wont do a thing, too big a bearing it wont fit in the hole, too small and it wont close up the gap inside.

crap pic hopefully gets the rough idea

post-20826-1222956173_thumb.jpg

a spring will be between the ball bearing and the screw, too strong tension and the boost will be too high, too soft tension and fully wound in the boost controller wont do a thing, too big a bearing it wont fit in the hole, too small and it wont close up the gap inside.

crap pic hopefully gets the rough idea

post-20826-1222956173_thumb.jpg

haha interesting, always thought it worked differently. so yeh guess the spring would have had to of come out for the BB to have. mm reckon ill take the thing out and go round to a few places and match the parts. cbf sourcing out a new controller as i need it by next sat.

haha interesting, always thought it worked differently. so yeh guess the spring would have had to of come out for the BB to have. mm reckon ill take the thing out and go round to a few places and match the parts. cbf sourcing out a new controller as i need it by next sat.

thats only my understanding, maybe in more sane hours someone else can confirm thats basically how they work, i opened a mates up by accident once by unscrewing it too much and thats the order of things inside it.

the picture you drew is exactly how a manual spring and ballbearing type bleed valve works. Theres only one other type of manual bleed valve that i know of and its just like a "tap", same principle as a water tap. The sping type are much better as far as manual controllers go.

i would just go to any performance shop and just get a new turbosmart bleed valve, it cant be much more than 100bucks, if no good go to repco and they'll have something, someone will have one in stock. You'll spend all afternoon going around trying to get the right parts for the current bung one.

Just spend $30 and get a new Turbotech mbc. I wouldn't bother trying to source new parts as there was probably a fair bit of thought gone into springs specs and I guarantee you won't be able to get one the same as the one you lost.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...