Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've done a search and I know that it's best to have compression across all the cylinders ~10% but what I'd like to know is how bad my results are and whether I should start looking for a new motor (25 conversion maybe). Currently my turbo is playing up so I will be looking for an RB25 turbo as it is and I could factor that price into a complete engine.

My results on an accurate reader were:

165 160 165 155 140 130

Is it time to start looking around for a new motor?

Low compression certainly indicates wear. Ultimately it will result in less power, increased consumption, poor running and eventually a busted engine. How bad it gets is a mixed bag of factors. Some engines go for ever with a low cylinder or two and make OK power. Depends what you want from the engine, how hard you drive, what your plans are etc etc. Engines are always wearing out, that's the nature of the beast.

Weigh up what you want from the car, how you're set for finances and go from there. You're not going to hurt the car by driving it as it is but if you flog it constantly you will accelerate the wear and possibly cause damage from failure down the track.

Low compression certainly indicates wear. Ultimately it will result in less power, increased consumption, poor running and eventually a busted engine. How bad it gets is a mixed bag of factors. Some engines go for ever with a low cylinder or two and make OK power. Depends what you want from the engine, how hard you drive, what your plans are etc etc. Engines are always wearing out, that's the nature of the beast.

Weigh up what you want from the car, how you're set for finances and go from there. You're not going to hurt the car by driving it as it is but if you flog it constantly you will accelerate the wear and possibly cause damage from failure down the track.

Thanks mate. I'm babying it a fair bit these days especially since the turbo is on its last legs. My ultimate goal isn't to make it a power house and it's mainly just a daily driven normally with a bit of a squirt on the weekends but eventually I'd love to attend some track days. Currently I'm saving money and picking up bits I need so I guess it's time to seriously consider the RB25 swap.

If you've got engine wear and a dying turbo then tread carefully. Failure of either could cause some serious damage to the rest of the engine. If you have track aspirations then at the very least you're going to want a healthy standard engine in there. Do some reading on what power you can get from your intended setup and if it's not enough the consider having a rebuild done with upgraded internals. A good rule of thumb is to build the engine stronger than what you want from it to give you some head room to grow and to protect the engine.

Good luck :)

If you've got engine wear and a dying turbo then tread carefully. Failure of either could cause some serious damage to the rest of the engine. If you have track aspirations then at the very least you're going to want a healthy standard engine in there. Do some reading on what power you can get from your intended setup and if it's not enough the consider having a rebuild done with upgraded internals. A good rule of thumb is to build the engine stronger than what you want from it to give you some head room to grow and to protect the engine.

Good luck :)

Cheers dude, I'm barely reving the thing just driving around normally until my other car goes on the road. A healthy motor will definitely be in order as reliability is my aim, I don't need much power just enough for a bit of fun. I'd really like the torque from an RB25 but was pretty happy with my 20's top end.

Thanks again.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...