Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys! I recently got my car back on the road and everything tuned up, GT Auto Garage did the work and i am extremely happy with their service and work on the car. I was just wanting people opinions on the tune, and the power output i obtained with the mods i have. I have looked at a few other peoples results and it seems a lot of people are making more power then me with similar mods. Admittedly the guys at GT did say they were tuning it safely to prolong engine life, but i just want to know how much more i could be seeing! I was told AFM's were maxed out at the 270kw power level also.

Mods are listed in my sig and here are the printouts -

post-4555-1225110467_thumb.jpg post-4555-1225110488_thumb.jpg

Thanks guys!

Edit - Other info on the sheet is - Ratio: 3.555, TCF: 1, Gain: 0

Edited by Got Boost?
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/242017-opinions-gtr-dyno-results/
Share on other sites

Unfortunately the Air Flow Meters are going to be your limiting factor there but I was sure you would still squeeze a tiny bit more out of it. Even so, it's not always about the number on the paper, it's about how it drives and does it feel as fast as you would like it?

A good tune is hard to come by so if it drives the way you want, i'd say you're on a winner mate.

got a graph with a boost plot?

looks fairly unresponsive to me for such small turbos... nothing happens until around 5000rpm

Also that dip near 7000rpm shouldnt be there either

Not a bad result, but i think it could be better even with stock AFM's

^ shouldnt be that laggy at all.

Ive got 250rwkw @ 12psi from GT-SS (similar to R34 N1s), stock dumps/AFM/injectors etc etc.

Im making 7-10psi by like 3300-3500rpm, and not soon after it hits 250rwkw... almost 1500rpm sooner than graph above (250rwkw/5500rpm)

So i reckon either the EVC isnt setup well, or there is something else quite wrong.

sooo laggy.

my car makes 100rwkw more 3500rpm earlier in comparison.

are all gtr's that laggy?

don't think so. this is my old set-up.

32 GTR, stock engine, stock turbos (could have been N1s never really sure,but I think stock). HKS actuators, stock dumps, stock Intercooler, stock front pipes, apexi pods, cat back exhaust, cam gears, profec B and Power FC, running 15psi/1.05bar. i'm trying to think what 100km/h is in 4th? about 3800 or a abit less I think. it certainly felt very responsive.

0517001bo2.jpg

Really? So the car should be picking up a lot earlier then it is? What other printouts / info should i obtain so i can figure it out?

mate

dyno is dyno

doesn't mean anything

when you drive on the road.when the car on boost?

early on late?

when the car hit full boost?

i think power figure is good.

with light mods for 270kw.

not bad at all.

my mate got T517z with head gasket / cams/ injector/ apexi pfc/ z32 afm. he made 322kw on 1.4bar.

your power is not too bad.

try put z32 afm and cams. it might change big time

:devil::D

Edited by peter eddie

What do you mean dyno is dyno? And means nothing?

It actually can mean quite a lot, and as that graph shows the car is terribly laggy. Simple as that. Its not a safe tune... its as laggy as if it had a 800hp turbo on there, but 1/2 the power.

You cannot deny it. Its clearly coming on late, my estimation is it makes 14psi @ 5500-5800rpm. It should be on by 4000rpm at the latest.

How it 'feels' on the street necessarily doesn't mean much either...

Golden question of the day -How do you know what its meant to feel like? Ill be broad and say - NO IDEA!

If Ben has never been in a properly responsive setup with similar turbos etc, you'd think anything was better than stock most of the time.

Hence he is coming here to ask people that either have been in/involved/own setups similar, what thier results were.

And as ive got my own, seen many and been involved in enough... the result shows something wrong. Could be a few things.

A peak power figure... in this instance means basically nothing.

Its the area around the midrange 3500-5500 RPM that is the big issue here.

Cams wont fix the prolem, if anything it might make it worse, another bad point in your post im afraid.

And... sadly your mates setup really doesnt offer anything to this thread either.

I agree with you Peter Eddie .

Dynos will measure peak power for sure but in no way accurately measure max power and torque throughout the rev range unless fully loaded from zero boost

Even then its not the road and done in either 4 or 5th gear slowly building up revs.

That power is aw power also not rear wheel as per most of the dyno charts on this site.

I am sure you know what a good tune feels like on the road.

Please excuse nismoid he can be quite arrogant,outspoken and condescending at times .

GTAuto garage wins my vote everytime and they will not sacrifice your engine for the sake of a pretty dyno chart. heh heh

Even then its not the road and done in either 4 or 5th gear slowly building up revs.

^^ you can adjust the ramp rate and load up the dyno to easily simluate the road to 'near enough'.

Even then its not the road and done in either 4 or 5th gear slowly building up revs.

That power is aw power also not rear wheel as per most of the dyno charts on this site.

As per results posted by DirtGarage and other users, even in 400rwkw, going to awkw lost less than 10kw between the two runs

I agree with you Peter Eddie .

Dynos will measure peak power for sure but in no way accurately measure max power and torque throughout the rev range unless fully loaded from zero boost

Yes but even if you don't agree about the dyno measuring peak power correctly, it is a tuning tool in the sense that it can be used to determine if the boost is coming on too late, or the power / AFR ratio could be better at some point in the rev range.

I mean, my car may be making less power on the dyno (and has stock turbos), but its curve is much more smooth (more like an arc then a very slow increase in power;) ). I also make ~200kw much earlier than in that graph....a lot more similar to what beer baron showed.

I think there is more tuning to be done there or something is wrong...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I'm looking for some real world experiences/feed back from anyone who has personally ran a EFR7670 with a 1.05 exhaust housing or a .83 I'm leaning towards the .83 because its a street car used mostly for spirited driving in the canyons roads. I"m not looking for big numbers on paper. I want a responsive powerband that will be very linear to 8000 rpm. I dont mind if power remains somewhat flat but dont want power to drop off on top. The turbo I've purchased is a 1.05, although the mounting flange T3 vs T4 and internal vs external waste gates are different on both housings, I not concern about swapping parts or making fabrication mods to get what I want. Based on some of the research I've done with chat gpt, the 1.05 housing seems to be the way to go with slightly more lag and future proofing for more mods but recommends .83 for best response/street car setup. AI doesn't have the same emotions as real people driving a GTR so I think you guys will be able to give me better feed back 😀   
    • Surely somebody has one in VIC. Have you asked at any shops?  Is this the yearly inspection or did you get a canary?
    • This is where I share pain with you, @Duncan. The move to change so many cooling system pieces to plastic is a killer! Plastic end tanks and a few plastic hose flanges on my car's fail after so little time.  Curious about the need for a bigger rad, is that just for long sessions in the summer or because the car generally needs more cooling?
    • So, that is it! It is a pretty expensive process with the ATF costing 50-100 per 5 litres, and a mechanic will probably charge plenty because they don't want to do it. Still, considering how dirty my fluid was at 120,000klm I think it would be worth doing more like every 80,000 to keep the trans happy, they are very expensive to replace. The job is not that hard if you have the specialist tools so you can save a bit of money and do it yourself!
    • OK, onto filling. So I don't really have any pics, but will describe the process as best I can. The USDM workshop manual also covers it from TM-285 onwards. First, make sure the drain plug (17mm) is snug. Not too tight yet because it is coming off again. Note it does have a copper washer that you could replace or anneal (heat up with a blow torch) to seal nicely. Remove the fill plug, which has an inhex (I think it was 6mm but didn't check). Then, screw in the fill fitting, making sure it has a suitable o-ring (mine came without but I think it is meant to be supplied). It is important that you only screw it in hand tight. I didn't get a good pic of it, but the fill plug leads to a tube about 70mm long inside the transmission. This sets the factory level for fluid in the trans (above the join line for the pan!) and will take about 3l to fill. You then need to connect your fluid pump to the fitting via a hose, and pump in whatever amount of fluid you removed (maybe 3 litres, in my case 7 litres). If you put in more than 3l, it will spill out when you remove the fitting, so do quickly and with a drain pan underneath. Once you have pumped in the required amount of clean ATF, you start the engine and run it for 3 minutes to let the fluid circulate. Don't run it longer and if possible check the fluid temp is under 40oC (Ecutek shows Auto Trans Fluid temp now, or you could use an infrared temp gun on the bottom of the pan). The manual stresses the bit about fluid temperature because it expands when hot an might result in an underfil. So from here, the factory manual says to do the "spill and fill" again, and I did. That is, put an oil pan under the drain plug and undo it with a 17mm spanner, then watch your expensive fluid fall back out again, you should get about 3 litres.  Then, put the drain plug back in, pump 3 litres back in through the fill plug with the fitting and pump, disconnect the fill fitting and replace the fill plug, start the car and run for another 3 minutes (making sure the temp is still under 40oC). The manual then asks for a 3rd "spill and fill" just like above. I also did that and so had put 13l in by now.  This time they want you to keep the engine running and run the transmission through R and D (I hope the wheels are still off the ground!) for a while, and allow the trans temp to get to 40oC, then engine off. Finally, back under the car and undo the fill plug to let the overfill drain out; it will stop running when fluid is at the top of the levelling tube. According to the factory, that is job done! Post that, I reconnected the fill fitting and pumped in an extra 0.5l. AMS says 1.5l overfill is safe, but I started with less to see how it goes, I will add another 1.0 litres later if I'm still not happy with the hot shifts.
×
×
  • Create New...