Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Seriously - if you can find a Cressida in good nick it's about the most comfy car you can find. Sounds like you're after something a bit newer though.

Yeah something much newer :P, Those things are old as now ahahha

  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

what are you lazy? you like to take the long trip but for what.. to sit back.. for the couple of trips a yr i wouldnt complain about not having cruise control.. plus you can buy kits for cruise control

An R34 GTR won't have cruise control :P

How about you list *everything* you expect from a car, then we can suggest one

Fair enough, but if i bought a 34GTR it definetly wouldn't be a daily driver it would be like a pet lol

Ok requirements that im looking for:

Ability to atleast do 500km to a tank of fuel.

Fairly Smooth over bumps and bad roads

As low as possible interior noice

and a good/smooth automatic transmission.

Budget 30K and bellow, nothing over 60,000k's and nothing older then 2003.

I would like it to also have the following but these aren't as important as the ones on top:

Semi quick 0-100 under 9 seconds

Some sexines lol

Inexpensive to own

Start suggesting :(

Edited by AlexR34
There you go...the car is 99% OK, change the suspension, done :banana:

lol, i do like them so im not gonna say anything bad about them ahahah, ill probably take one for a test drive myself and then make up my mind.

Fair enough, but if i bought a 34GTR it definetly wouldn't be a daily driver it would be like a pet lol

Ok requirements that im looking for:

Ability to atleast do 500km to a tank of fuel.

Fairly Smooth over bumps and bad roads

As low as possible interior noice

and a good/smooth automatic transmission.

Budget 30K and bellow, nothing over 60,000k's and nothing older then 2003.

I would like it to also have the following but these aren't as important as the ones on top:

Semi quick 0-100 under 9 seconds

Some sexines lol

Inexpensive to own

Start suggesting :D

My GTR got 630 klms from a tank ONCE... It was on the way back from Sydney to the Gold coast! since then............... couldnt tell you! 25lt per 100klms!! lol.. as for the other criteria! I cant help you!

Maybe if you wait a few months an Aurion TRD 3500s!?!?! not as boring as you think!

My GTR got 630 klms from a tank ONCE... It was on the way back from Sydney to the Gold coast! since then............... couldnt tell you! 25lt per 100klms!! lol.. as for the other criteria! I cant help you!

Maybe if you wait a few months an Aurion TRD 3500s!?!?! not as boring as you think!

Yeah they not bad looking haven't had a chance to drive one but yeah they pretty dear for my budget :D

came out with great features, such as 12 by 4.5 inch rims

and one of the funnier car reviews i have read:

Malcolm Bricklin, he of the Bricklin SV1, wouldn't be satisfied until he had forced every American to walk to work. To that end, in 1985, he began importing the Yugo GV, which turned out to be the Mona Lisa of bad cars. Built in Soviet-bloc Yugoslavia, the Yugo had the distinct feeling of something assembled at gunpoint. Interestingly, in a car where "carpet" was listed as a standard feature, the Yugo had a rear-window defroster — reportedly to keep your hands warm while you pushed it. The engines went ka-blooey, the electrical system — such as it was — would sizzle, and things would just fall off. Yugo. Or not.

came out with great features, such as 12 by 4.5 inch rims

and one of the funnier car reviews i have read:

Malcolm Bricklin, he of the Bricklin SV1, wouldn't be satisfied until he had forced every American to walk to work. To that end, in 1985, he began importing the Yugo GV, which turned out to be the Mona Lisa of bad cars. Built in Soviet-bloc Yugoslavia, the Yugo had the distinct feeling of something assembled at gunpoint. Interestingly, in a car where "carpet" was listed as a standard feature, the Yugo had a rear-window defroster — reportedly to keep your hands warm while you pushed it. The engines went ka-blooey, the electrical system — such as it was — would sizzle, and things would just fall off. Yugo. Or not.

Hey with all the petrol prices these days a yugo might not be such a bad idea lol.

a commodore??

i hear that they are really good nowadays.

cheap to run, soft on suspension, pretty good on fuel..and close enough to 9 secs.

Yeah commodores are actually ok, i really dont mind them but here's the thing. They COMMODORES. I could never drive a commodore no matter what it was, I just aint bogan enough dag nabit lol

+1 for XR6 turbo. A mate of mine had one and it was a great car. Bugger all mods and had plenty of go in it. But stock they are not too bad on fuel either. But if you're not bogan enough for a commy, then im guessing the coon is a no go too lol.

+1 for XR6 turbo. A mate of mine had one and it was a great car. Bugger all mods and had plenty of go in it. But stock they are not too bad on fuel either. But if you're not bogan enough for a commy, then im guessing the coon is a no go too lol.

The falcon turbo is ok, but I don't think I could afford insurance for it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...