Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

in the riceness?? dude, you realise your on a skyline forum right? you work at retravision or somethin?? :)

Hang on there. My GTR doesn't have neons or a dose pipe. It's a skyline but, it's not "ricey".

Rice is what you have once you desend into the realm of it. The pointless noise and looks dept.

Be proud either way I say. If you are ricey then just be there :banana:

Rice is Serious Business

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/246503-bov/page/3/#findComment-4304308
Share on other sites

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

a few of you has met my friend Leigh and knows the problem he is having with his car. he bought a bov from autoworks and had them install it along with a pod filter. the car shoots out alot of black smoke when the cars in neutral and when driving most of the time there is smoke coming out of the zorst. the bov has been tightened all the way to the end and stil opens at low boost without any surging. when driving up and down the street and coming to a stop the revs dipped once or twice but stopped, but after along drive from beechboro utopia we stopped at a car park to check his oil and it constantly kept dropping until we revved it abit. i know putting the stock one will make the idle problem stop but with the black smoke there seemed to be less black smoke after we tighted it so would this help with the smoke aswell? do you need a tune for a pod filter?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/246503-bov/page/3/#findComment-4304986
Share on other sites

black smoke = less air in cylinder then the ECU thinks there is. Causing it to inject more fuel (rich)

bov tightened brought the air - fuel ratio closer to correct.

but there is air still escaping from the induction path, somewhere after the AFM and before the cylinders.

gaskets, clamps, hoses, check everything.

when you cant find anything else, change the bov to something you know that works. if that fixes it. you know there is something wrong with the bov.

simple fault finding here.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/246503-bov/page/3/#findComment-4308010
Share on other sites

black smoke = less air in cylinder then the ECU thinks there is, resulting in a richer mixture

bov tightened brought the air - fuel ratio closer to correct.

but there is air still escaping from the induction path, somewhere after the AFM and before the cylinders.

gaskets, clamps, hoses, check everything.

when you cant find anything else, change the bov to something you know that works. if that fixes it. you know there is something wrong with the bov.

simple fault finding here.

+1 It's not rocket doctory

P.S. Fixed. >_<

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/246503-bov/page/3/#findComment-4308407
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
    • Well this shows me the fuel pump relay is inside the base of the drivers A Pillar, and goes into the main power wire, and it connects to the ignition. The alarm is.... in the base of the drivers A Pillar. The issue is that I'm not getting 12v to the pump at ignition which tells me that relay isn't being triggered. AVS told me the immobiliser should be open until the ignition is active. So once ignition is active, the immobiliser relay should be telling that fuel pump relay to close which completes the circuit. But I'm not getting voltage at the relay in the rear triggered by the ECU, which leaves me back at the same assumption that that relay was never connected into the immobiliser. This is what I'm trying to verify, that my assumption is the most likely scenario and I'll go back to the alarm tech yet again that he needs to fix his work.      Here is the alarms wiring diagram, so my assumption is IM3A, IM3B, or both, aren't connected or improper. But this is all sealed up, with black wiring, and loomed  
×
×
  • Create New...