Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i have a family friend who knows IMG group very well, 1 of their customers is selling a black r35 premium model and will take 140k.

there seems to be a massive variance when u compare this to carsales website average price at 150-175k.

i still cry about selling my dads torana ss, 5ltr 2door, 1st owner for 4k in 2001...i then saw the exact same model on carsales in 2008 for 98k and it did sell within a month

Interesting analogy (exclusivity of model variant), but bad choice in cars :)

When I purchased my M3 in 2006, I could have purchased a similar year model CSL for EXACTLY the same price.

Exclusivity is one thing, but application and associated practicality is another. The CSL is PURELY a track car. Nothing else. Fixed bucket seats, no sat nav, no television, compressed CARDBOARD BOOT FLOOR ( :blink: ), no sunroof, etc etc....

It has an EXTREMELY TINY target market, and the low price they go for reflects this.

I understand and agree with your analogy, but bad choice in example :blush:

Ive actaully been looking for 2005 model M5s. New they were 230K+. Now they can be had for 130K.

Thats a lot of depreciation. The R35 would probably be even worse, as it is certain to have been flogged and also has a very small target audience.

Ive actaully been looking for 2005 model M5s. New they were 230K+. Now they can be had for 130K.

Thats a lot of depreciation. The R35 would probably be even worse, as it is certain to have been flogged and also has a very small target audience.

It's worse than that mate :)

M5s go new for about $250k on the road...

You can get 2005 models with 30-40,000kms for about $105-110,000

For $125-130k, you should be looking at a 2006 with 20-30,000kms :blush:

I wouldn't be buying an M5 from a private seller with no warranty though, but that's just me ;)

It's worse than that mate ;)

M5s go new for about $250k on the road...

You can get 2005 models with 30-40,000kms for about $105-110,000

For $125-130k, you should be looking at a 2006 with 20-30,000kms :blush:

I wouldn't be buying an M5 from a private seller with no warranty though, but that's just me :)

thx for making me feel even better. Is that the list pirce you have seen 105-110K from a dealer ? or is that after 'merli negotiations' :)

OKAY FORD/HOLDEN DRIVERS

The GTR doesnt carry a common door or isnt a normal family car with extra badges or a massive v8 engine and some bigger brakes!!!

there a supercar, i rekon u'd pay $100K++ even when they head towards 100,000km... considering that @ 80,000km the engine has to come out n get stripped and checked so theres big bucks and least things would get fixed if need be!

but yeah i really doupt they could loose as much as a mass production car, but like people said... its all to do with condition and spec, kms ect.

but wat i do know is, lol is that the HSV 427 will be 60 grand with 40,000km lol and 3 years old

><

thx for making me feel even better. Is that the list pirce you have seen 105-110K from a dealer ? or is that after 'merli negotiations' :D

Had a work colleague who just bought a 2006 M5 (I went along for the test drives and negotiations), so those are prices from DEALERS that we were able to negotiate down to.

You should be able to get them even cheaper from private sellers if you're comfortable with that avenue :laugh:

The market has dropped out of the bottom for high-end luxury cars (as you obviously know), so dealers are willing to deal to move their stock.

1. Past price movements of older GTR models can't be used as a guide because apart from the 100 R32's that were brought in by Nissan, they were never officially sold here.

2. Any item is only worth what a buyer is willing to pay. It's pointless to sit here and try and forecast what an R35 will be selling at in 5 years time because we don't know what the demand will be once cars are sold on the second hand market.

3. Just because a car (or any other asset) is advertised for a certain price or valued by a valuer at a certain price that doesn't mean the car will sell at said price.

i.e. it's all good to be quoting asking prices we've seen on Carsales or SAU, but we don't know what the final purchase prices were. They were likely lower than the advertised price.

IMO prices of R32 - R34 skylines of all kinds really started to take a dive once the second hand market was flooded with grey imports. This was a blessing and a curse. It meant regular people like myself could afford to purchase one. It also meant that owners who purchased their cars when they were still quite expensive took a huge depreciation hit.

I think the two biggest factors that will determine how well R35 GTR's hold their value will be:

i - the demand for the cars on the second hand market

ii - the number of grey imports available on the second hand market.

an R36 will come out eventually and everyone will jump on that bandwagon like they have with the r35 :3some: so the price will drop like it has with the R32/3/4

Its not like its a KPGC10 or KPGC110 GT-R.

I keep seeing the R32/R33/R34 mention but not the 2 most important GT-Rs, which are probally worth more then the current r35.

Has anyone negotiated on a discount price for the R35 (new) considering the current "buyer's market" due to the price of cars plummeting?

as i mentioned on this forum, the cheapest i know is a black r35gtr with 3000km for 140k :P

as i mentioned on this forum, the cheapest i know is a black r35gtr with 3000km for 140k :P

3000km on the clock would be a used one, though.

I am wondering if anyone has ordered a new one and got less than $170k for the car.

Interesting to know because a lot of prestige cars in that segment are finding it difficult to find owners.

R35 GTR residual value will be the same as in any other car. It's a mass produced car that 'currently' has high interest/ demand. Wait 3 years time and see if the demand is still as strong. Nissan Australia had strong initial demand for R32 back in 1991, then they had some problem selling it later on.

the only thing driving cars down lately is the current gobal crisis with money.

people borrow to much, and have to give it away with miniumal loses

=] i still rekon over $100k easy for a 7yr old one, its the japenese lambo =]]]

its a Super car, not a common car with 1,000,000 build no's every year

and they aint just a robot knocked up peice of junk like holdens n yank tanks with face lifts of the model 10years ago.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Kapr Haha yeah thats the one. I missed that you had a built up engine, I wouldn't want to run it on there either then. It was good in my situation just to replace the original turbo on a stock engine. @MBS206Yep definitely not a replacement for anything name brand
    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
×
×
  • Create New...