Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hrm...okay dave...

goodluck finding a *performance* car that has not had its arsed flogged...thats what they were built for mate. if you wanted to buy a car that hasnt had its ass flogged, you should start looking at bmw 318's or magna's or something?!?!?

and btw. knowing that this car IS capable of 300kw is bloody great! I know that the engine is running as it should be!

Just to update, the car is still for sale.

It's worth noting that the car made 230kW or less for most of the time that I had it. It only did about 3000km or so with the big turbo set-up. 300kW was actually a conservative tune, if we had really pushed it there was more power to be had. The engine is in excellent condition, as any test will show.

As for the camber question, I believe it was around 1.25 degrees negative.

Originally posted by GSR 13S

Any chance of the wheels being sold separatley?? I really want to get a set for my R

Cheers

You are better off with 18x9 at both ends, my set are 8-inch at the front and not the right offset for a GT-R anyway.

Ben,

Any specific reason y gtrs run equal width wheels front and rear?

Somone on the forum mentioned it was due to the need for the wheel diameters of the front and rear wheels to be equal for the attessa system to function properly. (Front and Rear wheels need to be travelling at same speed)

But i would imagine...with careful calculation of tire profiles, equal diameters would still be achievable, while allowing for a wider rear tire (since a gtr is rwd most of the time?)

Yes, you do need equal rolling diameters. I have seen GT-Rs with different-size wheels front to rear, but since the guards are designed to suit same-size at both ends, why not fit them? Unless you make the rear guards much larger, you will be compromising the front, rather than improving the rear, if you see what I mean

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yep, the closest base tune available was for the GTT, I went with that and made all the logical changes I could find to convert it to Naturally Aspirated. It will rev fine in Neutral to redline but it will be cutting nearly 50% fuel the whole way.  If I let it tune the fuel map to start with that much less fuel it wont run right and has a hard time applying corrections.  These 50% cuts are with a fuel map already about half of what the GTT tune had.  I was having a whole lot of bogging when applying any throttle but seem to have fixed that for no load situations with very aggressive transient throttle settings. I made the corrections to my injectors with data I found for them online, FBCJC100 flowing 306cc.  I'll have to look to see if I can find the Cam section. I have the Bosch 4.9 from Haltech. My manifold pressure when watching it live is always in -5.9 psi/inHg
    • Hi My Tokico BM50 Brake master cylinder has a leak from the hole between the two outlets (M10x1) for brake pipes, I have attached a photo. Can anyone tell me what that hole is and what has failed to allow brake fluid to escape from it, I have looked on line and asked questions on UK forums but can not find the answer, if anyone can enlighten me I would be most grateful.
    • It will be a software setting. I don't believe many on here ever used AEM. And they're now a discontinued product,that's really hard to find any easy answers on. If it were Link or Haltech, someone would be able to just send you a ECU file though.
    • Yes sir am asking is there possible way from aem tuner from wiring pins 
    • Have you checked cam to crank timing and confirmed balancer marks are correct?
×
×
  • Create New...