Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The primary need is to atomise the water as fine as possible, and I use the Spraying systems nozzle as identified in the autospeed article for both applications. I have the intake spray after the intercooler in the line where the air velocity is higher so there is less chance the water might settle out to pool. Before the IC it could settle out as the velocities reduce, much like an oil catch can or dry sump, although I doubt it with the heat. It is on a rising pipe as well so any overspraying or activation when the engine is not running will have the water run down to the intercooler. Just worried about hydrostatic lock. It is really a worthy upgrade.

  • Replies 70
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

What water does is raise the detonation threshold.

To understand what this is, you need to understand detonation. What happens with detonation is that the trapped mixture is ignited by the spark and begins to burn in the area immediately around the plug. This burning causes the (mostly)nitrogen in the air to expand from the heat and increase the chamber pressure.

Now the burning continues until all the mixture is burned and pressure and temperature reach a maximum, usually at about 20 degrees ATDC. The ignition timing is early enough to always get the maximum at around 20 degrees ATDC.

What can happen though, is that the pressure and temperature in the chamber can get high enough to cause not burning but a spontaneous EXPLOSION. The whole lot detonates like a bomb creating a huge shock wave that breaks things.

So it is temperature and pressure that causes detonation. So you must lower the temperature and pressure reached DURING ACTUAL COMBUSTION(or use a less detonation prone fuel).

One way is to inject water. It does not have to be fully vaporised before it reaches the engine. Even a solid jet of water is going to flash into steam either during the compression stroke, or actual combustion. It is the high latent heat of water that lowers the peak combustion temperature and reduces detonation.

Another interesting feature is that the steam expands along with the nitrogen in the air to act as the working fluid that pushes down the piston. So although peak temperatures are much reduced, the pressures are not, and you lose no power by adding water, in fact you gain a bit.

A lot of people do not realise that it is the nitrogen in the air that does not burn which actually pushes the piston down. And steam works even better.

The reason I suggested fuel injectors is because they can meter in precise small quantities into every cylinder, and the fine spray is going to assist vaporisation.

Spraying water into the turbo inlet also works, but like fuel distribution, you have no way of knowing if that water is going to find its way into all cylinders in equal quantity. It will if it is fully vaporised, but it may not be.

Warpspeed

I like your explanation, saved me from digging through my archives although I would suggest that the nitrogen is not the only working fluid, even though it takes up some 70% of the atmosphere. This was the reason for oxygen injecting the Lynx 1.8 with stock exhaust and pod filter to achieve low 7 second 0-100 times. Also used an extra injector and water injection off a throttle switch to activate it all and activated it at over 3000rpm for a huge push from the little machine.

Anyway, have to go look for some new pistons. Time to go to that forged piston thread after the bearings went west and scored #3 big end journal and cracked 2 pistons prior to the water injection.

Yes you are right. The other gasses and fuel do not just disappear, but the nitrogen working fluid is something that fascinated me when I first learned of it.

It is also why nitrous oxide works so well, it is mostly nitrogen (N2O). I believe pure oxygen will increase combustion temperatures and can lead you up the dreaded detonation path, so be careful.

One way is to inject water. It does not have to be fully vaporised before it reaches the engine. Even a solid jet of water is going to flash into steam either during the compression stroke, or actual combustion. It is the high latent heat of water that lowers the peak combustion temperature and reduces detonation.

Yes, everything you said is true, but I still stand by my claim that injecting the water further up the intake piping will give it more time to effect it's intake charge temperature drop, rather than an instantaneous conversion from liquid -> gas if you were to squirt it down the runners.

Also atomised water will absorb a lot more heat than a "solid jet of water", as it has a lot more surface area. Using fuel injectors will not achieve this at all.

You are right, early complete vaporisation WILL remove heat from the intake charge, and lower induction temperatures. No argument there. Also lower charge temperatures mean more density, and this is extremely important for power production. So I agree.

But reducing detonation is a completely different thing to producing power. Detonation is only due to the peak temperature and pressure reached during actual combustion. Provided a certain mass of water is totally turned to vapor (boiled) the specific heat will reduce the final combustion temperature, and combustion will remain controlled.

So purely from detonation point of view it does not really matter where the water is introduced, or where along the chain of events it all finally boils off. During combustion it most certainly will all boil because the temperatures are so high.

Once again you are getting to the crux of the discussion. The cooler air is good, but the volume of water to cool the air is a tradeoff that sees no benefit from the cooler, denser charge. It is the detonation suppression that is the real benefit in introducing water to the cylinders.

I agree with Warpspeed, I think the water would flash into steam due to the heat.

Hydrolic lock is the big fear, thats why you have a safety solonoid valve in the system that stops the engine drawing water down the tube when not in boost cycle. Also stops dribbling etc.

I'm going down the path of an individual fogging nozzle in each runner with a computer controlled pump (inputs: RPM, Boost, Water Pressure).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Had I known the diff between R32 and R33 suspension I would have R33 suspension. That ship has sailed so I'm doing my best to replicate a drop spindle without spending $4k on a Billet one.
    • OEM suspension starts to bind as soon as the car gets away from stock height. I locked in the caster and camber before cutting off the kingpin. I then let the upright down in a natural (unbound) state before re-attaching it. Now it moves freely in bump and droop relative to the new ride height. My plan is to add GKTech arms before the car is finished so I can dial camber and caster further. It will be fine. This isn't rocket science. Caster looks good, camber is good, upper arm doesn't cause crazy gain and it is now closer to the stock angle and bump steer checks out. Send it.
    • Pay careful attention to the kinematics of that upper arm. The bloody things don't work properly even on a normal stock height R32. Nissan really screwed the pooch on that one. The fixes have included changing the hole locations on the bracket to change the angle of the inner pivot (which was fairly successful but usually makes it impossible to install or remove the arm without unbolting the bracket from the tower, which sucks) and various swivelling upper arm designs. ALL the swivelling upper arm designs that look like a capital I (with serifs) suck. All of them. Some of them are in fact terribly unsafe. Even the best one of them (the old UAS design) shat itself in short order on my car. The only upper arm that works as advertised and is pretty safe is the GKTech one. But it is high maintenance on a street car. I'm guessing that a 600HP car as (stupidly, IMO) low as you are going is not going to be a regular driver. So the maintenance issues on suspension parts are probably not going to be a problem. But you really must make sure that however your fairly drastically modded suspension ends up, that the upper arms swing through an arc that wants to keep the inner and outer bolts parallel. If the outer end travels through an arc that makes that end's bolt want to skew away from parallel with the inner bolt, you will build up enormous binding and compressing forces in the bushes, chew them out and hate life. The suspension compliance can actually be dominated by the bush binding, not the spring rate! It may be the case that even something like the GKTech arm won't work if your suspension kinematics become too weird, courtesy of all the cut and shut going on. Although you at least say there's no binding now, so maybe you're OK. Seeing as you're in the build phase, you could consider using R33/4 type upper arms (either that actual arm, OEM or aftermarket) or any similar wishbone designed to suit your available space, so alleviate the silliness of the R32 design. Then you can locate your inner pivots to provide the correct kinematics (camber gain on compression, etc).
    • The frontend wouldn't go low enough because the coilover was max low and the upper control arm would collapse into itself and potentially bottom out in the strut tower. I made a brace and cut off the kingpin and then moved the upright down 1.25" and welded. i still have to finish but this gives an idea. Now I can have a normal 3.25" of shock travel and things aren't binding. I'm also dropping the lower arm and tie rod 1.25".
    • Motor and body mockup. Wheel fitment and ride height not set. Last pic shows front ride height after modifying the front uprights to make a 1.25" drop spindle.
×
×
  • Create New...