Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i bought my skyline planning to use it as a daily and do the odd test n tune day or drift night,

have owned it for a year now,

the bloody thing is now off the road with a cage and no interior,

i realised the other day that i could be paying off a house with the amount i spend on my car each month :cool:

there is always something to do to it, inbetween comps it has either been a new radiatoor or oil cooler or p/steering work or this n that, its like a terminal disease, i never intended for it to become a full drift car, even got it booked in to a workshop this week for something then another workshop next week,

someone stop me.

but...

im happy ;)

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

My 32 was a daily for about 2 years, all mods were done in a weekend so that I could drive it on the Monday again (even the 30 conversion :)).

Now I have a Stag as my daily and the 32 is currently in pieces, putting all the bits on that I have collected over the last 18 months! going to be quite some fun when it's done :D

I hear its a great fertiliser.

for you mind.. now everyone eat up and video it when you do and post it up.

i planned on modding my car. bought a cooler and its sitting in my rooms coz i want a zorst before i put the cooler on. dont ask me why i bought it before a zorst.. johns just good at talking me into buying stuff lol

i planned on modding my car. bought a cooler and its sitting in my rooms coz i want a zorst before i put the cooler on. dont ask me why i bought it before a zorst.. johns just good at talking me into buying stuff lol

haha wanna buy my left shoe? :pirate:

any new mods done to your car Rob? or any plans?

haha wanna buy my left shoe? :D

any new mods done to your car Rob? or any plans?

nah last mod was the pod filter... i installed the start of my sound system in my car so im poor again!!! ahaha

  • 2 months later...

gt-r body conversion! best upgrade on the exterior imo ;)

or just a normal bodykit looks good too lol but the gt-r conversion is a nice way to go and blow your cash

hey mate check out on ebay, theres a full leather rewrapping kit, goes over almost everything.

it goes for around 500-1000 bucks? can't remember.

nice way to do up the interior for a pretty cheap price though.

much cheaper than getting a trimmer to do it all up for you

i got this planned for the future :thumbsup:




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So, if the headlights' cutoff behaviour (angles, heights, etc) are not as per 6.2.6.1.1 without automatic levelling, then you have to have to have automatic** levelling. Also, if the headlight does not have the required markings, then neither automatic nor manual adjusters are going to be acceptable. That's because the base headlight itself does not meet the minimum requirement (which is the marking). ** with the option of manual levelling, if the headlight otherwise meets the same requirements as for the automatic case AND can be set to the "base" alignment at the headlight itself. So that's an additional requirement for the manual case. So, provided that the marking is on the headlight and there is a local manual adjustment back to "base" on the headlight, then yes, you could argue that they are code compliant. But if you are missing any single one of these things, then they are not. And unlike certain other standards that I work with, there does not seem to be scope to prepare a "fitness for purpose" report. Well, I guess there actually is. You might engage an automotive engineer to write a report stating that the lights meet the performance requirements of the standard even if they are missing, for example, the markings.  
    • Vertical orientation   6.2.6.1.1. The initial downward inclination of the cut off of the dipped-beam to be set in the unladen vehicle state with one person in the driver's seat shall be specified within an accuracy of 0.1 per cent by the manufacturer and indicated in a clearly legible and indelible manner on each vehicle close to either headlamp or the manufacturer's plate by the symbol shown in Annex 7.   The value of this indicated downward inclination shall be defined in accordance with paragraph 6.2.6.1.2.   6.2.6.1.2. Depending on the mounting height in metres (h) of the lower edge of the apparent surface in the direction of the reference axis of the dipped beam headlamp, measured on the unladen vehicles, the vertical inclination of the cut off of the dipped- beam shall, under all the static conditions of Annex 5, remain between the following limits and the initial aiming shall have the following values:   h < 0.8   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   0.8 < h < 1.0   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   Or, at the discretion of the manufacturer,   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The application for the vehicle type approval shall, in this case, contain information as to which of the two alternatives is to be used.   h > 1.0   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The above limits and the initial aiming values are summarized in the diagram below.   For category N3G (off-road) vehicles where the headlamps exceed a height of 1,200 mm, the limits for the vertical inclination of the cut-off shall be between: -1.5 per cent and -3.5 per cent.   The initial aim shall be set between: -2 per cent and -2.5 per cent.
×
×
  • Create New...