Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 66
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

So your car was actually a legal height at the time?
the car was set to legal height when the gear was installed

Not at the time of instal. At the time you got pulled over was it a legal height and would it have been so if on level ground? If when you took it back they didn't need to change anything to make it a legal height then you'll have a leg to stand on.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/258570-defected/page/2/#findComment-4450872
Share on other sites

just went and took some photos with a spirit level and there is an extreme upward angle and an extreme left angle

both of these would make the car appear to low for the officers 110 mm measuring stick

(the wheels on the measuring police stick are 110 mm's in height )

i will get these pics blown up to take to court if i am able to adjourn it for another 3 weeks at my traffic lawyers request

cant wait till court tommorow!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/258570-defected/page/2/#findComment-4458002
Share on other sites

Being not level ie: a slope, incline ect doesn't make any difference to the measurement.

If the slope is constant with no undulation the measurement will be true.

You need an undulation, like a hump between front and rears or pothole..so the road is raised between your wheels or wheels lowered.

Goodluck with that.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/258570-defected/page/2/#findComment-4458033
Share on other sites

True the law is the law.

You'd have to have sponges for springs for an incline or decline to affect the test.

A flat surface is a flat surface whether it's tilted left-right up or down.

The issue is whether the surface was even (flat) ie: no undulations between the wheel base.

In other words the test can't be carried out on say a corrugated dirt road.

Hope he lucks out and gets a stupid judge.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/258570-defected/page/2/#findComment-4458476
Share on other sites

the point i have is that the upwards and left angle of that particular part of road is going to make quite a few stock cars fail the same "110 ''mm" height wheel

including a very stock vt ss commodore which came in at just under 100 mm

but upon taking it to flat ground both cars were fine

heinz tomato soup is 100 mm high and nothing catches on it underneath the skyline

i have also purchased the same wheel they have used to measure the ride height with as per my lawyers request

and thanks for the many good luck comments chaps lol

oh and if i do get raped

as the qld gov probably dont want me to win as then that will set a precedent and the flood gates will open with every low car claiming they were missmeasured

if i lose ill sell the skyline and import a 240zg with all the fruit

since it does not have 4 round tail lights im sure ill never be harrased for doing nothing again

lol

Edited by DAS KAMU
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/258570-defected/page/2/#findComment-4459339
Share on other sites

Being not level ie: a slope, incline ect doesn't make any difference to the measurement.

If the slope is constant with no undulation the measurement will be true.

You need an undulation, like a hump between front and rears or pothole..so the road is raised between your wheels or wheels lowered.

Goodluck with that.

the spot i got done on did make a differance

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/258570-defected/page/2/#findComment-4459373
Share on other sites

True the law is the law.

You'd have to have sponges for springs for an incline or decline to affect the test.

A flat surface is a flat surface whether it's tilted left-right up or down.

The issue is whether the surface was even (flat) ie: no undulations between the wheel base.

In other words the test can't be carried out on say a corrugated dirt road.

Hope he lucks out and gets a stupid judge.

surface was not flat

the judge today seemed to be on the ball

just a pity it was in richlands fuggen toothless junkies all over the place

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/258570-defected/page/2/#findComment-4459379
Share on other sites

when it is all sorted ill post it all up

ill be scanning in the transcripts from the court date set for the 19/03/2009 at 9am

as i adjourned it today for 2 weeks

at least some of us who are not cops on here will see how the system "works"

i am yet to find someone who is willing to share the same information which sucks balls as id like to see how it all goes down

2 weeks till the big day

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/258570-defected/page/2/#findComment-4459583
Share on other sites

when it is all sorted ill post it all up

ill be scanning in the transcripts from the court date set for the 19/03/2009 at 9am

as i adjourned it today for 2 weeks

at least some of us who are not cops on here will see how the system "works"

i am yet to find someone who is willing to share the same information which sucks balls as id like to see how it all goes down

2 weeks till the big day

Nice work, good win.

I'll retract that for later use...

Back to Good luck for you.

Good Luck

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/258570-defected/page/2/#findComment-4460305
Share on other sites

Jaonson... Cameron here brads mate.

This reminds me of something that happened to my brother in his "civic" the other week, the cop was off duty and saw my brother come down the hill from caltex and turn left into horizon drive and come up behind him so the next day I was working from home and looking out the window at the time and saw the Red highway cop car pull up out the front... just at the time I hear my mother yell out "Cameron what have you done this time!"

Cop walks up the driveway and asks if my brother was hoem and I explained he was at work, he explained why he was looking for him etc. he wanted to check his car for the height of his car... things I see wrong with this was... his car is registered under my fathers name not his hes not on it... yet he asked for by name :S

Cop preceeded to goto his worksite, he works for leightons and measure his car to fine him $100 and 1 point but didnt make him goto court over it the car was 85mm due to the exhaust coming off its hanger.

Goodluck with the car J,

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/258570-defected/page/2/#findComment-4462476
Share on other sites

just went and took some photos with a spirit level and there is an extreme upward angle and an extreme left angle

both of these would make the car appear to low for the officers 110 mm measuring stick

(the wheels on the measuring police stick are 110 mm's in height )

i will get these pics blown up to take to court if i am able to adjourn it for another 3 weeks at my traffic lawyers request

cant wait till court tommorow!

isnt legal height 100mm? if so 7 mm under that 110mm measuring wheel would actually be legal by 3mm...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/258570-defected/page/2/#findComment-4462657
Share on other sites

i took note of the wheel he had and i went and searched all the hardware stores for it

i found it and it is marked on the label as 100 mm's

but i assure you upon meusuring it - it is 110 mm's

its nice to have a bit of time to investigate

i hope i get a good result out of this

ill also be compiling a letter to the CMC of whoever the governing body are to keep these officers in line

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/258570-defected/page/2/#findComment-4463634
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...