Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Another VS thread.

I would like to hear everyones opinions about the R32 GTR vs the R33 GTR.

I can afford either one of these very capable machines, and I am weighing up the pro's and cons.

I would like to hear what you guys have to say.. Has anyone here owned both? Also current owners of either vehicle's opinions would definately be considered.

Thanks,

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/25890-gtrs-r32-vs-r33/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

although I dun own one...yet....

Appearance of R32 vs. R33 can be entirely subjective...so i'll leave that out.

However, paper specs of stock for stock GT-Rs would put the R32 up front, but in real world terms might not be much at all....

if it were up to me I'll get the 33 simply cos it's newer;)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/25890-gtrs-r32-vs-r33/#findComment-548832
Share on other sites

Pentae,

I have an R33 GTR. I bought it over a 32 mostly because I had a 96 gtst and didn't want to go backwards (age mostly) and prefered the 33's looks. They are bigger than the 32's with more room inside but it comes down to what you like the most. I couldn't find a decent 32 when I was looking so opted for a 33..

Plus my number plates have R33 in them so I had to have one to keep the plates from being stupid!!!!! ha ha ha

Yeah the 32's brand new were quicker but remember that most of them have done more kms' than most 33's so they should be pretty even these days...

Brett

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/25890-gtrs-r32-vs-r33/#findComment-549044
Share on other sites

Quicker how, perhaps 1/4 mile. But i would hazard a guess that R33s stop better, quicker around circuits or good stretch of road.

There are so many on the market with nice bits and pieces i think it really comes down to the quality/value of each car your looking at.

Lock yourslef into the market for only an R32 and you may miss an awesome R33, and vice versa.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/25890-gtrs-r32-vs-r33/#findComment-549054
Share on other sites

The 33 has brembo's whereas the 32 didn't (except for Vspecs), and I guess with newer suspension the 33 might corner better but I wouldn't put money on it. Weight wise it's only around 50 - 70kgs difference so they would still be pretty close. It's only around 1 tenth difference over a 1/4 mile anyway...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/25890-gtrs-r32-vs-r33/#findComment-549193
Share on other sites

Either buddy, they are both GTR's after all!!! ha ha ha

32 would be a little more 'chuckable' than a 33, but both outhandle most other cars on the road so you have a blast no matter what one you pick.. For long drives I'd pick the 33 with more room. I can punt my R into a corner 15 - 20 km/hr faster than my old GTS and it feels safer too....

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/25890-gtrs-r32-vs-r33/#findComment-549225
Share on other sites

EVL33, Yeah, I was having some fun with that on the test drives. I do love both of these cars.

And ATESSA is definately fun.

I think an R32 would suit me more as its a less 'pimp' looking ride, a bit more down to earth styling.. and imho less inclined to get keyed at your local shopping center by a jealous 80's falcadore owner than an r33..

However, with the 15 year import rule coming in, there will be a lot more people in the lower price bracket range driving around in these. (especially GTR's). This is a bit of a turn off, as mid 2005 everyone will probably have one. Like the Silvias..

The R33 has heaps of room and gets looked at a hell of a lot more though. It's a very tough decision.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/25890-gtrs-r32-vs-r33/#findComment-549264
Share on other sites

both cars have a similar weight, only 50kgs difference so that doesnt really make much of a difference, both cars are still quite heavy and you notice it around town (and in your petrol bills).

r32 is definately more tail happy, is much smaller inside and has more of a race car feel.

the r33 has a longer wheel base, and reworked attessa, and feels much more stable and is less inclined to get the tail out unless you are really pushing it...

stock for stock the 32 is much more fun to drive, you could almost say the 33 is boring in comparison, and while it still is a fast car it doesnt feel it.

once you reach the 450-500hp mark the 32 starts to get 'unstable' and requires considerable driving skill, around this power level the 33 is just starting to become fun to drive and is still very stable.

once you reach around 600hp the 32 is starting to become unsuitable for the street, however the 33 is brilliant at this stage and shrugs off everything you throw at it, at this level of power the 33 is an awesome car.

over 600hp, 33gtr.

this is just my opinion after driving and riding in both cars at various power levels, some may disagree :(

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/25890-gtrs-r32-vs-r33/#findComment-549292
Share on other sites

I would personally prefer a r33 GTr cause its newer, r32 are a bit old... Is it me or is the r32 dash look real dated? When i sit in a r33 it feels like a new car but the r32 interior is old and small and just done appeal to me at all! but from the outside the look of the r32 from the front those lights..... All i can say is beast!!! i love the r32 body!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/25890-gtrs-r32-vs-r33/#findComment-549449
Share on other sites

Hey croat,

My g/f is Yugoslav. Good looking people :)

The r32 dash isnt that bad if you put a nismo or equiv dash in. The air conditioning vents on the sides are modern looking, the round ones anyway.

To be honest the 'new car' part is definately a plus.. but I have seen some DAGGY r32 gtr's and recently just seen some r32 gtr's that are in absolutely mint condition that made me fall in love with the series. In any case, I will locate the best quality r32 gtr and the dash will be replaced and i will be putting in new soft black leather on the gearshift and handbrake to make it look new again.

I guess what I'm trying to say is, I can either get a really beautiful well looked after r32 GTR with low km's, or get a r33 GTR in the lower part of the price bracket that probably isnt as well looked after.

FYI I am comparing Stock Standard examples.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/25890-gtrs-r32-vs-r33/#findComment-549577
Share on other sites

Hey guys, you've all got good opinions so far, it would be good to hear more.. But..

I am starting to think the R32 GTR is one of those cars that will always be regarded a classic. like the original mustang.. I believe this is the car that a car company got 'Right'. The r33 is also one of those cars, but is not as raw as an example as the r32.

I am of the opinion that the r33 has a softer, more commercial oriented slant the car company introduced to appeal to more people in general. Like the overall size inside and so forth. It seems like less of a racing car.

A good condition r32 with low kilometers is not rare, but certainly is uncommon due to the cars age. I believe if I treat it like a road registered race car, and lube it with racing oils (like Motul) and service it every 5000km's, it will be in a lot more solid running condition than a large portion of R33's out there.

I think keeping the car close to stock, which, In my opinion is still plenty of power and fun.. will mean my car will be on the road the majority of its life.

If I was going to modify the car up to 600hp, I would get a R33, I intend on keeping my car close to stock performance wise.. no more than an exhaust system and air intake.. the r33 simply wont be as chuckable and fun.

I also believe the ATESSA is still quite good on the r32. It's been improved from the r33 to the r34, it does not mean the ATESSA system on the r33 is shite either.

What do you think?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/25890-gtrs-r32-vs-r33/#findComment-550262
Share on other sites

As a few others have said, i think the R33 is going to be quicker when conrers and stops are introduced, as the ATESSA has been improved, bit better brakes (late model ABS as well... computer power!) and different wheelbase and track, which all go some wasy to making the car grip/handle a litte more consistantly.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/25890-gtrs-r32-vs-r33/#findComment-550693
Share on other sites

the r33 might be quicker, but the r32 is more fun to drive. And I want fun over speed as I am keeping the car close to stock. The difference is not an overly huge amount anyway.

The fact is its still a GTR and from my small amounts of driving experience in both models an r32 will still kick nine colours of shit out of everything else on the road, especially the wrx lads.

How much of a difference are we talking here between the r33's atessa system? 10%? twice as good?

I guess i'll just have to get a V-spec r32. :uh-huh:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/25890-gtrs-r32-vs-r33/#findComment-551173
Share on other sites

Dude, if you plan on keeping the R stock you might reconsider your statement about whopping WRX's on the street.. If they are slightly modded and have a decent driver you'll be in for a very close race... Remember the rexy has a lot less weight than we do and 4wd. R's are not super quick when stock, ask any owner... :P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/25890-gtrs-r32-vs-r33/#findComment-551531
Share on other sites

I think the reason most R's are not quick when they are stock is the terrible exhaust system they are gagged with as well as that 206kw restricter thing.. what the hells it called someone?

When I say 'close to stock' I mean stock with a basic exhaust system (not a $4000 rice cannon) and the restricter removed, and some new air filters for the existing stock air box.

No fmic's, no boost controllers, no bov's or any of that..

I'm sorry, I always thought ATESSA was a better system to 4wd, especially a pig understeerer like a rex.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/25890-gtrs-r32-vs-r33/#findComment-551579
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, apparently they do fit, however this wont be a problem if not because the car will be stationary while i do the suspension work. I was just going to use the 16's to roll the old girl around if I needed to. I just need to get the E90 back on the road first. Yes! I'm a believer! 🙌 So, I contacted them because the site kinda sucks and I was really confused about what I'd need. They put together a package for me and because I was spraying all the seat surfaces and not doing spot fixes I decided not to send them a headrest to colour match, I just used their colour on file (and it was spot on).  I got some heavy duty cleaner, 1L of colour, a small bottle of dye hardener and a small bottle of the dye top coat. I also got a spray gun as I needed a larger nozzle than the gun I had and it was only $40 extra. From memory the total was ~$450 ish. Its not cheap but the result is awesome. They did add repair bits and pieces to the quote originally and the cost came down significantly when I said I didn't need any repair products. I did it over a weekend. The only issues I had were my own; I forgot to mix the hardener into the dye two coats but I had enough dye for 2 more coats with the hardener. I also just used up all the dye because why not and i rushed the last coat which gave me some runs. Thankfully the runs are under the headrests. The gun pattern wasn't great, very round and would have been better if it was a line. It made it a little tricky to get consistent coverage and I think having done the extra coats probably helped conceal any coverage issues. I contacted them again a few months later so I could get our X5 done (who the f**k thought white leather was a good idea for a family car?!) and they said they had some training to do in Sydney and I could get a reduced rate on the leather fix in the X5 if I let them demo their product on our car. So I agreed. When I took Bec in the E39 to pick it up, I showed them the job I'd done in my car and they were all (students included) really impressed. Note that they said the runs I created could be fixed easily at the time with a brush or an air compressor gun. So, now with the two cars done I can absolutely recommend Colourlock.  I'll take pics of both interiors and create a new thread.
    • Power is fed to the ECU when the ignition switch is switched to IGN, at terminal 58. That same wire also connects to the ECCS relay to provide both the coil power and the contact side. When the ECU sees power at 58 it switches 16 to earth, which pulls the ECCS relay on, which feeds main power into the ECU and also to a bunch of other things. None of this is directly involved in the fuel pump - it just has to happen first. The ECU will pull terminal 18 to earth when it wants the fuel pump to run. This allows the fuel pump relay to pull in, which switches power on into the rest of the fuel pump control equipment. The fuel pump control regulator is controlled from terminal 104 on the ECU and is switched high or low depending on whether the ECU thinks the pump needs to run high or low. (I don't know which way around that is, and it really doesn't matter right now). The fuel pump control reg is really just a resistor that controls how the power through the pump goes to earth. Either straight to earth, or via the resistor. This part doesn't matter much to us today. The power to the fuel pump relay comes from one of the switched wires from the IGN switch and fusebox that is not shown off to the left of this page. That power runs the fuel pump relay coil and a number of other engine peripherals. Those peripherals don't really matter. All that matters is that there should be power available at the relay when the key is in the right position. At least - I think it's switched. If it's not switched, then power will be there all the time. Either way, if you don't have power there when you need it (ie, key on) then it won't work. The input-output switching side of the relay gains its power from a line similar (but not the same as) the one that feeds the ECU. SO I presume that is switched. Again, if there is not power there when you need it, then you have to look upstream. And... the upshot of all that? There is no "ground" at the fuel pump relay. Where you say: and say that pin 1 Black/Pink is ground, that is not true. The ECU trigger is AF73, is black/pink, and is the "ground". When the ECU says it is. The Blue/White wire is the "constant" 12V to power the relay's coil. And when I say "constant", I mean it may well only be on when the key is on. As I said above. So, when the ECU says not to be running the pump (which is any time after about 3s of switching on, with no crank signal or engine speed yet), then you should see 12V at both 1 and 2. Because the 12V will be all the way up to the ECU terminal 18, waiting to be switched to ground. When the ECU switches the fuel pump on, then AF73 should go to ~0V, having been switched to ground and the voltage drop now occurring over the relay coil. 3 & 5 are easy. 5 is the other "constant" 12V, that may or may not be constant but will very much want to be there when the key is on. Same as above. 3 goes to the pump. There should never be 12V visible at 3 unless the relay is pulled in. As to where the immobiliser might have been spliced into all this.... It will either have to be on wire AF70 or AF71, whichever is most accessible near the alarm. Given that all those wires run from the engine bay fusebox or the ECU, via the driver's area to the rear of the car, it could really be either. AF70 will be the same colour from the appropriate fuse all the way to the pump. If it has been cut and is dangling, you should be able to see that  in that area somewhere. Same with AF71.   You really should be able to force the pump to run. Just jump 12V onto AF72 and it should go. That will prove that the pump itself is willing to go along with you when you sort out the upstream. You really should be able to force the fuel pump relay on. Just short AF73 to earth when the key is on. If the pump runs, then the relay is fine, and all the power up to both inputs on the relay is fine. If it doesn't run (and given that you checked the relay itself actually works) then one or both of AF70 and AF71 are not bringing power to the game.
    • @PranK can you elaborate further on the Colorlock Dye? The website has a lot of options. I'm sure you've done all the research. I have old genuine leather seats that I have bought various refurbing creams and such, but never a dye. Any info on how long it lasts? Does it wash out? Is it a hassle? What product do I actually need? Am I just buying this kit and following the steps the page advises or something else? https://www.colourlockaustralia.com.au/colourlock-leather-repair-kit-dye.html
    • These going to fit over the big brakes? I'd be reeeeeeeeaaaall hesitant to believe so.
    • The leather work properly stunned me. Again, I am thankful that the leather was in such good condition. I'm not sure what the indent is at the top of the passenger seat. Like somebody was sitting in it with a golf ball between their shoulders. The wheels are more grey than silver now and missing a lot of gloss.  Here's one with nice silver wheels.
×
×
  • Create New...