Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Another thought Matt, put the stocker back on the inlet, reconnect the NVCS, use the inlet adjustable cam for the exhaust side, sell the inlet cam as an exhaust cam, and you can have your bottom end response back with extra mod money:)

  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

According to the engine dyno sim's the stock inlet cam is pretty spot on for the 2.5ltr. If you increase the duration you gain very little up top but a noticable amount down low.

However if you were running a 3ltr then increasing the duration on the inlet to around 260 you actually pick up power both down low, mid and up top.

Exhaust cams is where the gains are if the cams were origionally designed for that capacity motor.

But then again its only a software sim. is it right? I would like to know if the larger duration inlet cams really do pick up power with the 3ltr bottom end.

I was under the impression inlet cams cannot be used as exhaust cams due to the CAS? :D

Can the RB25DET cams be used on the R32 RB25DE head?

So to answer your question we have run 292 @ 9 mm without "headwork".  We also have run 264 @ 10.5 mm and done headwork.

To answer the second question, based on my personal experience;

240 is standard GTST

248 is standard GTR

256 is a good mild street upgrade, go for 9 mm lift

264 is a good combo (street, track, circuit) go for 10 mm lift

272 is a good for circuit work at 10.5 mm lift

Hope that helps

SydneyKid, with the 264 with 10 mm lift, is it only the grinding of the head for clearance you need to do, or are the valve springs etc changed. looking at options to go with a HKS gt3040 on an rb25 to be used for street,track,circuit!

SydneyKid, with the 264 with 10 mm lift, is it only the grinding of the head for clearance you need to do, or are the valve springs etc changed.  looking at options to go with a HKS gt3040 on an rb25 to be used for street,track,circuit!

Hi craved, we change valve springs at anything over 9.5 mm lift. Plus, with the GT3040, you are going to be able to run over 1.3 bar which is the rule of thumb limit I put on standard RB25DET valve springs. That's my 2 reasons for changing valve springs, the 3rd is RPM. Anything over 8,500 rpm is a real good reason as well.

Hope that helps

Hi craved, we change valve springs at anything over 9.5 mm lift.  Plus, with the GT3040, you are going to be able to run over 1.3 bar which is the rule of thumb limit I put on standard RB25DET valve springs.  That's my 2 reasons for changing valve springs, the 3rd is RPM.  Anything over 8,500 rpm is a real good reason as well.

Hope that helps

:rant: it does help thanks,

what is the limit of the of the standard crank in terms of rpm? do these cams assist in increasing the rpm limit of the engine? (still learning)

also currently the GT3040 is running a 1.12 exhaust housing so will be pretty laggy, with higher lift will that help spool this up quicker?

Hi Craved, my thoughts follow your questions..........

what is the limit of the of the standard crank in terms of rpm?

I really don't know, there are so many things other than RPM that cause problems with crankshafts. If you need to rev it, chances are you have increased the other items like combustion pressure, torque loadings, clutch initial grab etc. We have certainly used 9,000 rpm for 400 rwkw without any problems. But maybe 9,000 rpm and 450 rwkw is, or 9,500 rpm and 350 rwkw. Obviously if the crank is balanced and lighter rods and pistons are used this increases the crankshaft lifing. I have seen over 1,000 bhp out of a standard RB30 crank and I have seen a standard RB20 crank rev to 10,500 rpm. There are to many possible combinations to give a definitive answer.

do these cams assist in increasing the rpm limit of the engine?

They will certainly increase the rpm range that it can operate in efficiently. Generally speaking the standard cams start to top over at 6,500 rpm. You should find that this sort of timing and lift will push that up to 7,500 rpm and if decent port work and exhaust (manifold, wastegate and pipework) are used then 8,000 rpm is not unusual. That's not the rpm limit, just where the power starts to drop off when an appropriately sized turbo is used.

also currently the GT3040 is running a 1.12 exhaust housing so will be pretty laggy

What capacity is the engine?

with higher lift will that help spool this up quicker?

Yep, that has been our experience. As long as the duration doesn't move the power band outside the required spool up rpm.

Hope that helps some more

I really don't know, there are so many things other than RPM that cause problems with crankshafts.  If you need to rev it, chances are you have increased the other items like combustion pressure, torque loadings, clutch initial grab etc.  We have certainly used 9,000 rpm for 400 rwkw without any problems.  But maybe 9,000 rpm and 450 rwkw is, or 9,500 rpm and 350 rwkw.  Obviously if the crank is balanced and lighter rods and pistons are used this increases the crankshaft lifing.  I have seen over 1,000 bhp out of a standard RB30 crank and I have seen a standard RB20 crank rev to 10,500 rpm.  There are to many possible combinations to give a definitive answer.

wasn't really looking to go as far as 9,000 rpm , maybe 8,000rpm max, using standard rods/pistons at this stage.. dont wanna spend up crazy just yet!

They will certainly increase the rpm range that it can operate in efficiently.  Generally speaking the standard cams start to top over at 6,500 rpm.  You should find that this sort of timing and lift will push that up to 7,500 rpm and if decent port work and exhaust (manifold, wastegate and pipework) are used then 8,000 rpm is not unusual.  That's not the rpm limit, just where the power starts to drop off when an appropriately sized turbo is used.

sweet, that really works with my above mentioned target/thoughts (not sure which yet!)

Exhaust housing will be made by myself and a mate, high mount customs dump to 3 1/4" exhaust. head port and polish is something ive thought about but not found someone that i know has worked with these, will hit my mechanic up with all these new options im getting... most of the work will be done by myself though!

What capacity is the engine?

standard rb25! still working on the compression that i'll be running! do you know what the standard compression is for the rb25, and the size of say a standard nissan headgasket for them too...?

Yep, that has been our experience.  As long as the duration doesn't move the power band outside the required spool up rpm.

so it's all about the tune as everything is, but it will be better than running standard cams.

Hope that helps some more

thanks SK, heaps more to think about than i initially thought, so your helping me along the way!

one more thing... do you need the head removed to change the cams on the rb25? i know on bmw's ive worked on need the head off the car to access the cam. this goes for the grinding needed to clear the cam lobes too ..

cheers

Another thought Matt, put the stocker back on the inlet, reconnect the NVCS, use the inlet adjustable cam for the exhaust side, sell the inlet cam as an exhaust cam, and you can have your bottom end response back with extra mod money:)

Has anyone done this? I am yet to try retarding the exhaust side. I bought another cam gear yesterday and will fit tonight.

Sydneykid, have you had experience with this setup, I would like to know if it would loose me alot of power up to for more down low... I might be best keeping both cams if the exhuast retard helps.... grrrr that's it I'm putting it on right now.

Cam gear has been installed.

After some research I came to the conclusion each pulley is 720 degrees with 48 teeth which equals to 15 degress per tooth. 4 degress equaled one mark on my OS cam gears. So I set the exhaust to -4 and intake to 2(half a mark). The difference is quite noticable with more power everywhere. Compared to with the VCT off boost is now about the same. Does come on boost(4300-4500) with more of a rush than with standard cams and -4 cam gear. So I figure the new 264's are helping more than just at 6000 rpm were power appears like a light switch.

Ok i need some help and here looks to be the right place.

I bought some Tomei 256 8.5mm cams off this forum.. now when they arived i opened the box to find something looking exactly like the stock cams in my engine. We couldn't measure any differance in lift so I took them to a cam place and they said they are exactly the same as the old one.

Now this isn't a huge problem because the seller said he would refund my money even though he was sure he sent me the right cams.

So I would like to know for sure before I send them back.

Do tomei put any identifing marks on there cams?

Do they still have the stock "S6" or "U5" cast in them at the back?

anything else that may help etc

Thanks

John

I have Tomei cams. Mine have 264 8.5mm stamped on the rear bearing. The stockers have nothing. The difference is very noticable just from looking at the two side by side. Measure the lobe height and if it is 7.8 max then they are stockers. I think 8.5 is the smallest lift you can get.

Steve: I can't swap the inlet cam for exhaust as it doesn't have the CAS keyway. Is making more power than the VVT now anyway (since I turned my cams gears the correct way...hehe opps)

I'm not 100% on all this and am looking at getting some cam work done. I've done a bit of researching and it seems that I should go for a 270 duration with 9mm lift. Should I be using the same for both intake, and exhaust or different profiles? Next question I have is when talking to the shop about the cams I was told that the Rb25DET has two different cams that are used, with one cam set bigger than the other. With these differences is it possible to interchange these cams between engines, or can you only use the bigger/smaller cams in an engine that originally came with these bigger/smaller cams?

I've done a bit of researching and it seems that I should go for a 270 duration with 9mm lift.

Our experience has been that it is pretty much a waste of time going for long duration (270 degrees) with low lift (9 mm). You end up with an unneccessarily lumpy engine that doesn't make equivalent power. For a road, sometimes track, car you would be better off with 264 degrees at 9.5 mm lift or much better with 264 degrees at 10 mm lift. For a mostly track car, I would use a 272 degree camshaft with at least 10.5 mm lift.

Hope that helps

Our experience has been that it is pretty much a waste of time going for long duration (270 degrees) with low lift (9 mm).  You end up with an unneccessarily lumpy engine that doesn't make equivalent power.  For a road, sometimes track, car you would be better off with 264 degrees at 9.5 mm lift or much better with 264 degrees at 10 mm lift.  For a mostly track car, I would use a 272 degree camshaft with at least 10.5 mm lift.

Hope that helps

OK so the longer the duration the later power will be in the rev range and a lumpier idle. Is there any disadvantage from going higher lift ?? 8.5mm on my 264's seems abit low. Would there be much advantage from going to 9.5mm lift? Without upgrading springs that is. Power comes on very hard at 6000rpm with the 264's. I wouldn't want it any later. My head is also majorly ported. Is higher or lower lift better suited to a ported RB25?

Sorry for all the questions but Julian's 21st Century Performance book doesn't help much.

Cam gear has been installed.

After some research I came to the conclusion each pulley is 720 degrees with 48 teeth which equals to 15 degress per tooth.

each wheel should be 360 degrees with 7.5 degrees per tooth.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, apparently they do fit, however this wont be a problem if not because the car will be stationary while i do the suspension work. I was just going to use the 16's to roll the old girl around if I needed to. I just need to get the E90 back on the road first. Yes! I'm a believer! 🙌 So, I contacted them because the site kinda sucks and I was really confused about what I'd need. They put together a package for me and because I was spraying all the seat surfaces and not doing spot fixes I decided not to send them a headrest to colour match, I just used their colour on file (and it was spot on).  I got some heavy duty cleaner, 1L of colour, a small bottle of dye hardener and a small bottle of the dye top coat. I also got a spray gun as I needed a larger nozzle than the gun I had and it was only $40 extra. From memory the total was ~$450 ish. Its not cheap but the result is awesome. They did add repair bits and pieces to the quote originally and the cost came down significantly when I said I didn't need any repair products. I did it over a weekend. The only issues I had were my own; I forgot to mix the hardener into the dye two coats but I had enough dye for 2 more coats with the hardener. I also just used up all the dye because why not and i rushed the last coat which gave me some runs. Thankfully the runs are under the headrests. The gun pattern wasn't great, very round and would have been better if it was a line. It made it a little tricky to get consistent coverage and I think having done the extra coats probably helped conceal any coverage issues. I contacted them again a few months later so I could get our X5 done (who the f**k thought white leather was a good idea for a family car?!) and they said they had some training to do in Sydney and I could get a reduced rate on the leather fix in the X5 if I let them demo their product on our car. So I agreed. When I took Bec in the E39 to pick it up, I showed them the job I'd done in my car and they were all (students included) really impressed. Note that they said the runs I created could be fixed easily at the time with a brush or an air compressor gun. So, now with the two cars done I can absolutely recommend Colourlock.  I'll take pics of both interiors and create a new thread.
    • Power is fed to the ECU when the ignition switch is switched to IGN, at terminal 58. That same wire also connects to the ECCS relay to provide both the coil power and the contact side. When the ECU sees power at 58 it switches 16 to earth, which pulls the ECCS relay on, which feeds main power into the ECU and also to a bunch of other things. None of this is directly involved in the fuel pump - it just has to happen first. The ECU will pull terminal 18 to earth when it wants the fuel pump to run. This allows the fuel pump relay to pull in, which switches power on into the rest of the fuel pump control equipment. The fuel pump control regulator is controlled from terminal 104 on the ECU and is switched high or low depending on whether the ECU thinks the pump needs to run high or low. (I don't know which way around that is, and it really doesn't matter right now). The fuel pump control reg is really just a resistor that controls how the power through the pump goes to earth. Either straight to earth, or via the resistor. This part doesn't matter much to us today. The power to the fuel pump relay comes from one of the switched wires from the IGN switch and fusebox that is not shown off to the left of this page. That power runs the fuel pump relay coil and a number of other engine peripherals. Those peripherals don't really matter. All that matters is that there should be power available at the relay when the key is in the right position. At least - I think it's switched. If it's not switched, then power will be there all the time. Either way, if you don't have power there when you need it (ie, key on) then it won't work. The input-output switching side of the relay gains its power from a line similar (but not the same as) the one that feeds the ECU. SO I presume that is switched. Again, if there is not power there when you need it, then you have to look upstream. And... the upshot of all that? There is no "ground" at the fuel pump relay. Where you say: and say that pin 1 Black/Pink is ground, that is not true. The ECU trigger is AF73, is black/pink, and is the "ground". When the ECU says it is. The Blue/White wire is the "constant" 12V to power the relay's coil. And when I say "constant", I mean it may well only be on when the key is on. As I said above. So, when the ECU says not to be running the pump (which is any time after about 3s of switching on, with no crank signal or engine speed yet), then you should see 12V at both 1 and 2. Because the 12V will be all the way up to the ECU terminal 18, waiting to be switched to ground. When the ECU switches the fuel pump on, then AF73 should go to ~0V, having been switched to ground and the voltage drop now occurring over the relay coil. 3 & 5 are easy. 5 is the other "constant" 12V, that may or may not be constant but will very much want to be there when the key is on. Same as above. 3 goes to the pump. There should never be 12V visible at 3 unless the relay is pulled in. As to where the immobiliser might have been spliced into all this.... It will either have to be on wire AF70 or AF71, whichever is most accessible near the alarm. Given that all those wires run from the engine bay fusebox or the ECU, via the driver's area to the rear of the car, it could really be either. AF70 will be the same colour from the appropriate fuse all the way to the pump. If it has been cut and is dangling, you should be able to see that  in that area somewhere. Same with AF71.   You really should be able to force the pump to run. Just jump 12V onto AF72 and it should go. That will prove that the pump itself is willing to go along with you when you sort out the upstream. You really should be able to force the fuel pump relay on. Just short AF73 to earth when the key is on. If the pump runs, then the relay is fine, and all the power up to both inputs on the relay is fine. If it doesn't run (and given that you checked the relay itself actually works) then one or both of AF70 and AF71 are not bringing power to the game.
    • @PranK can you elaborate further on the Colorlock Dye? The website has a lot of options. I'm sure you've done all the research. I have old genuine leather seats that I have bought various refurbing creams and such, but never a dye. Any info on how long it lasts? Does it wash out? Is it a hassle? What product do I actually need? Am I just buying this kit and following the steps the page advises or something else? https://www.colourlockaustralia.com.au/colourlock-leather-repair-kit-dye.html
    • These going to fit over the big brakes? I'd be reeeeeeeeaaaall hesitant to believe so.
    • The leather work properly stunned me. Again, I am thankful that the leather was in such good condition. I'm not sure what the indent is at the top of the passenger seat. Like somebody was sitting in it with a golf ball between their shoulders. The wheels are more grey than silver now and missing a lot of gloss.  Here's one with nice silver wheels.
×
×
  • Create New...