Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Usually on bigger HP stuff (supercharged V8's) the cars come in after being on a engine dyno so indivual cylinder mixtures were already monitored and addressed either by 8 EGT probes or 8 lambda probes in each collector. This makes tuning the engine less stressful as the tuner only needs to monitor overall mixtures (left and right on v8's or single sided on inline 6's and 4's).

With the majority of other setups the car comes in "green" pretty much the brainchild of the owner, with more empahis on cost and ease instead of result and capability so things like cylinder distribution is often overlooked and hard to monitor. This is never really an issue on stock plenum RB's etc but over the past few weeks i have had quite a few differrent plenum styles come through for final dyno tuning, some good, some bad.

Now without going into specific brands i can say that most of the established retail type products seem to work very well, and the individual shop made or cut and shut std manifolds fair far worse. One particular plenum was nice and shiny but required a 8% differrence in fuel delivery between 1 and 6, now this may not seem to bad but at idle this makes for a fairly cranky number 6 spark plug and untuned would almost certainly result in a melted piston or low knock threshhold (which was what initially alerted me to the issue).

A quick simple test is to run minimum boost in 3rd or 4th and shut the car off at the top of the pull and remove all the plugs, all colours should be equal. increase boost to your max tuned boost and do the pull again. Compare the colours and if you find the plugs get darker as you go back along the cylinders or vice versa you have an issue. The problem usually gets worse with boost and depending on plenum design can get lean as you go back or richer so make sure to lay the plugs in order. There is another culprit for poor cylinder distribution (feul this time not air) and that is the fuel rail but rb rails are pretty good and most cases ive been able to trace back to plenum based air distribution issues.

ive included some pics of spark plugs these two shots show the differrence between no cylinder compensation and cylinder compensation. These issues are easy to address in most aftermarket ecu's but if you find you need large adjusments, consider a new plenum.

post-34927-1237610117_thumb.jpg

post-34927-1237610146_thumb.jpg

Edited by URAS

something similar, any with the water inlet supplied separate tend to leak badly down the track. Just a quick note to let you know the difference in fitting a copy versus a genuine greddy plenum, we charge 250 more to fit a copy as it takes 3 times as long to fit.

Just a quick note to let you know the difference in fitting a copy versus a genuine greddy plenum, we charge 250 more to fit a copy as it takes 3 times as long to fit.

lol, i wouldnt do that to you, the only other things im doing to the 33 is afm, pump, injectors (which i still havnt gotten checked yet) and tune then im selling it.

Edited by W0rp3D

hey Trent do u have any results for rb26's running stock plenums? i run individual egt's and my results and a friend running egt's as well but with different turbo setup is showing alot different to what i have always heard stated as "fact" on this forum. number 6 is the hottest off boost and Not the hottest on fullboost by a fair bit, is this what you have found as well?

hey Trent do u have any results for rb26's running stock plenums? i run individual egt's and my results and a friend running egt's as well but with different turbo setup is showing alot different to what i have always heard stated as "fact" on this forum. number 6 is the hottest off boost and Not the hottest on fullboost by a fair bit, is this what you have found as well?

whats number 1 and 2 doing under big boost on yours?

Trent, I run individual EGT's in each exh runner and have corrections of up to +12% and -14% depending on boost pressure.

This is on a stock plenumed rb26.....

what turbo setup, rail/inj and boost (bigger boost means bigger corrections? entry angle to plenum is also critical. We some interesting corrections on the race car but not that big. Luckily your ecu allows inj vs boost correction most dont, The 795-odd hp 2jz in the other thread needed between 6-8% in the rear 3 after 18psi, i spose i got carried away without stating that the test only takes a few mins and can save an engine, can be checked by anyone and requires no expensive gear, it should be a precautionary check taken after any plenum mods or in cases like yours after any mods. Most importantly it is not concrete but is a worthwhile test none the less.

Edited by URAS

URAS, did you test the air distribution on a rb25det greddy plenum? Just put a (genuine) one on my car and now you got me a bit worried :down:

/Martin

Edited by WilYawn

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Input shaft bearing. They all do it. There is always rollover noise in Nissan boxes - particularly the big box. Don't worry about it unless it gets really growly.
    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
×
×
  • Create New...