Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 470
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Will be very interesting to see now that they've been made legal how much of an advantage or non advantage they really were....I don't rekon it will be that much of an advantage at all personally but time will tell!

Shane i reackon you will start seeing Ferrari and McLaren up there as well mate

Ferrari's car has some good pace....and now that they will prob be running those diffusers they should start showing their true pace

move over Jenson Button....the Ferrari boys are coming

WT.... ?? have u guys got some kinda weird beer goggles on? ferrari have genuine pace? u mean, being the 9th and 10th quickets cars on the track is genuine pace? mebe if you said that about the Brawn cars... but ferarri? hell no, they have dropped the ball big time! if i was a ferarri fan, all i'd be feeling now is dissapointment

WT.... ?? have u guys got some kinda weird beer goggles on? ferrari have genuine pace? u mean, being the 9th and 10th quickets cars on the track is genuine pace? mebe if you said that about the Brawn cars... but ferarri? hell no, they have dropped the ball big time! if i was a ferarri fan, all i'd be feeling now is dissapointment

tifosi sux0r

-D

Ferrari do have some genuine pace but I'm not expecting any miracles in Shanghai, but I hope they surprise me!

my guess is that give it a couple of rounds before we start seeing some results

WT.... ?? have u guys got some kinda weird beer goggles on? ferrari have genuine pace? u mean, being the 9th and 10th quickets cars on the track is genuine pace? mebe if you said that about the Brawn cars... but ferarri? hell no, they have dropped the ball big time! if i was a ferarri fan, all i'd be feeling now is dissapointment

then how come they qualify better luke ;)

i remember correctly it was Hamilton in the 10th position (last years champion) and Kimi in 5th

and thats not genuine pace.....Brawn cars have a heck of a better setup and all and they are the pace setters so cant say that they have genuine pace as i am measuring others against the Brawn cars

on another news RON DENIS has quit from Mclaren....now who will defend Hamilton lol

Edited by Krishy
then how come they qualify better luke ;)

i remember correctly it was Hamilton in the 10th position (last years champion) and Kimi in 5th

and thats not genuine pace.....Brawn cars have a heck of a better setup and all and they are the pace setters so cant say that they have genuine pace as i am measuring others against the Brawn cars

u see how they post weights for qualifying now... and it shows that ferarri are running light, if not the lightest in the top 10 (if they even make top 10)... that means they have a slow car

whats this mumbo jumbo about hamilton??? kimi 5th?? what?

lol, doesnt genuine pace need to be measured against the feild... otherwise its not genuine? "wow, ferarri have the fastest 2 ferarri powerd cars in f1" true... but still means they have failed to score a point in the championship thus far against legal cars!!!! and they are not even the quickest out of the non diffuser cars!! so no, they dont have pace, genuine or otherwise! they have kers... they have loyal fans, but in 2009, they have no results! and hence no genuine pace!

show me the points!!!!!

if i remember correctly Ferrari in the last race weren't so light....i was speaking of last race qualifying about Hamilton being in 10th and kimi in 5th.....i am not saying that Brawn cars are not good....they are bloody awesomely setup cars to be where they are now.....running a merc engine.....

Ferrari have failed to score points so far but its not been because of the car lacking pace.....for eg last race kimi when out on a dry track with wet tyres on....no more said

Ferrari have genuine pace when one considers that they were not using what was a suspect diffuser and the addition weight of the KERS. I'm led to believe also that Fridays free practice times from both Australia and Malaysia show that the F60 has genuine pace out of the box.

Obviously relative to the Brawn GP cars they're not quite on it yet.

Even in pre season testing Ferrari were dominating the times there.....so your saying thats not genuine pace luke?

will be interesting to see if the Ferrari boys change to the "suspect" diffusers now that they have passed...according to a report that "suspect" diffuser was giving better aero dynamic downforce.....good for about half a second better per lap

anyone splashing cash on this round? To win:

BUTTON Jenson

$2.35

BARRICHELLO Rubens

$5.50

TRULLI Jarno

$12.00

VETTEL Sebastien

$14.00

GLOCK Timo

$15.00

Few other categories you can gamble to!

http://www.tabonline.com.au/cgi-bin/main.p...orts/index.html

If you need a hand with how to place a bet, i can help ;)

genunie pace is measured in races... ferarri are LAST in the constructors standings. i can give you gold stars for being quick in practise and testing, but gold stars mean sfa and so do your comments about how quick their cars are... show me time and weight comparisions to prove your point!! without evidence ur statments make you look like giant fools!

and the diffusers have never been illigal... some people are just smater than others =)

PS seen the times from P1 today?... ferarri 11th and 14th which is an accurate reflection of how slow their cars are aka their "genuine pace" =P

genunie pace is measured in races... ferarri are LAST in the constructors standings. i can give you gold stars for being quick in practise and testing, but gold stars mean sfa and so do your comments about how quick their cars are... show me time and weight comparisions to prove your point!! without evidence ur statments make you look like giant fools!

and the diffusers have never been illigal... some people are just smater than others =)

PS seen the times from P1 today?... ferarri 11th and 14th which is an accurate reflection of how slow their cars are aka their "genuine pace" =P

practise sessions dont mean anything and yes i was just pointing out that Ferrari did well in the testing but dnt know what has gone so wrong for them on race weekends

its only been like 2 races and people are already writting out teams like ferrari and mclaren

too soon dont you think...Ferrari is last in the constructors championship as they have made some bad calls in terms of qualifying and getting DNF's which isnt a true reflection on the pace they produce all weekend

they will be up there soon....Ferrari has a habit of starting badly and finishing strongly

its a long season

McLaren fastest in the first session. Ferrari not so fast......

interesting would like to now what they heck have they done to make a big improvement since last round

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Came here to say, put all the wiring from the new motor and gearbox in that you can, then throw the stock ECUs in the bin, and get an aftermarket ECU. Should be pretty easy if you can use a multimeter and read a wiring diagram to then use a PNP aftermarket ECU to suit the motors wiring loom, and make the minimal changes you will to get it to work in with the body loom (If any). This will mean you can very easily circumvent/bypass the Park/Neutral start disable switch, and get everything running really easy!
    • If the roof is dual skinned the whole way, IE, there's a "top" metal piece, and a "bottom" metal piece, to slow it down as much as you practically can, you should be able to get an attachment for a spray can/your spray gun, where it is a long, thin flexible hose, and when you're "spraying" it is spraying it in every direction possible. The I'd get that, and feed it through the roof as much and as far as you can. It's basically like fish oiling the car, but you're soaking it in rust converter. Then do the fix like Murray has described having cleaned up the existing metal as much as you humanly can. I'd also throw as much rust converter on that exposed metal before putting the fibreglass/metal filler over everything.   As for welding a replacement in. I've owned my own MIG welder for about 10 years. I've also worked in an industry doing MIG welding for a job for about 3 months dead straight, and we were doing 11.5 hour work days 5 days a week, plus a Saturday 6 hour day. (I then moved over to running the massive CNC plasma as I could understand the technology, and work with the main guy out there). I also f**k around with my welders a bit at home. So what I'm saying here is, I've probably got more hours on a MIG gun than you'll manage to get under your sleeve doing home sorts of jobs over the next 5 years. I also have an ACDC TIG that I got myself a year or two back. I've got a short amount of experience on the TIG only. My home MIG is also presently setup for doing thin sheet metal. Unless I didn't care about how that roof looked, and I just wanted a functional metal roof, and it being out of alignment, warped, and bowed, I would NOT attempt a roof replacement UNLESS I could do it as a whole panel like Murray described where the spot welds were.  Welding has this REALLY annoying thing, where if you want something to be perfectly square, unless you can clamp that thing to damn perfection (Welding fixture table), it is NOT going to be square, so you start to learn, the type of metal you're working with, how thick it is etc, and weld in VERY specific ways, and by knowing how YOU are as a welder, so that as the welds cool, the metal work pulls itself into place. If you want to see some cool tricky shit done, Bennets Customs is an Aussie guy, and he mentions a guy a lot call "Kyle", who is from "Make It Kustom". Watch some of their welding videos, especially on sheet metal. You can use the welder to shrink the steel in, and you can also use the welder to stretch the panel out. When you have the skill level that I have, you can shrink the metal in and out... But never on purpose like those two guys do. You just manage to f**k it all up. Then I smack it around with a hammer till it sits lower than I will want it too, then I shove filler on top and then pray to deitys that I can sand it into some form of sane shape that doesn't look like a dog has taken a shit, after eating a tonne of pumice stone... I'm all for DIY, and for learning, and please, feel free to give it a go, but be aware, you need to live with the consequences of how time consuming it is to do, AND that it's going to look no where near as good as what you can make it look with just some filler now. Oh AND, even once you replace it, it's like to still rust away again eventually, because you'll have missed putting primer and paint on some part of the newly welded in sheet metal, or against part of the existing metal you couldn't get to...   Oh, and to weld all that in, you will need to pull the window out, and strip at least the roof and A Pillars of interior trim and wiring. You'll then need things like the big fire proof/weld spatter proof mats to lay down, OR you'll end up needing to strip the ENTIRE interior to avoid sending it all up in a ball of flames. If you want to see how annoying sheet metal is to weld, head to bunnings, buy there 600x600 1.6mm mild steel (Not GAL!) sheet, and cut a few pieces, and try and weld them together. Then understand, 1.6mm sheet is nearly 50 to 100% THICKER than the cars sheet metal.   The photos I posted before, I'm replacing with 1.2mm thick mild sheet, and it's very easy to blow through both the original steel (Especially if I hit an area that should have probably been cut out a bit more) or straight through the new sheet metal. And I'm doing the floor, which can be hidden easily, and doesn't matter how pretty I make it, as long as it's damn strong! I'm also doing it in a 4WD, that has seen many off road trails, and doesn't need to look that pretty ever
    • This sounds like a perfect excuse to install a Haltech R3.
    • I do believe from context he is talking about a S0/S1 R33 RB25 with associated ECU and Wiring for that, and a manual gearbox into a R34 N/A Auto. I don't have the knowledge of all the pinouts and such but my gut feeling from doing my own conversion is to use as much of the R33 stuff that you can. The "car" wiring is quite seperate from the "Engine" wiring when all things are considered. The only things to truly consider 99% of the time is the cluster, reverse lights and potentially disabling the 'not in P/N' immobilizer circuit.
    • A realistic expectattion of how long it has to last also comes down to.... when do you think you will be banned from registering and driving old petrol powered shitters? It's 27 years since that thing was built. It probably rusted out 15 years ago. It was probably repaired and looked OK for another 10. If you do a similarish bodge job now, or perhaps slightly better with some actual rust conversion and glassing, then.... get another 10-15 years out of it, after which you'll only be permitted by the CCP to drive electric cars manufactured in their Shenzen zone anyway. 
×
×
  • Create New...