Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Originally posted by Steve-SST

Its a worry but i have seen many so called Hiflows not match the standard one so be carefull. Best thing is to find the extra cash for a proven after market job.

Yeah, Thats why im looking to get a HKS2530. SkydneyKid thinks they are the bees knees and are a better alrounder than the 2540.

  • Replies 335
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Originally posted by BOOSTD

what size outlet does your high flow have??? and when does it make 15psi? Exhaust A/R ??

Funny you should mention that boostd, I've asked them on a few occasions what the specs were on my high flow and they said they didnt know and would have to ask Precision (the company they sent it off to to get done). I havent got an answer yet.

It makes 0.8bar at about 4k, under that it feels doughy

I mentioned the turbo you built (I read the thread about your turbo build) and they said it wasnt a good idea to go down that path. They would sell me a brand new HKS2430 or 2540 for $2500.

I'm currently wondering what to do.

That $2500 for a Bran new HKS turbo sounds a little strange. Bran new HKS turbo's are in the 4k range. Never have I seen anyone who can sell them for in the 2k range. I have seen second hand HKS turbo's from around 1500 right up to 3000.

So maybe he means its new to you but second hand.

You can get a GT30 500hp for $2300..

Then there's the external wastegate and on the list goes.

MRK25T, Damn mine makes full boost(1.2bar) by 4k, so a good hi-flow should spool-up quicker. I'd suggest getting it tuned somewhere else just to make sure it isn't the tune giving you the low power, other than that a new turbo looks to be on the cards:(

How much does it cost to upgrade your exhaust housing? My compressor is fairly beefy at .6, but the rear looks a little small. Not sure of the size but it's noticably smaller than the front.

JimX, Be careful when trying to mix and match turbo housings etc, as the results aren't always good. Best to get a compressor map made to see what the turbo will be like before you put it on. You can get really bad compressor surge if there not matched properly:(

I think I already have compressor surge :P I've been given this advice by someone who had a similar turbo to mine, but better matched:

t4/t3, to4 compressor with a h trim wheel, vl turbo .63 exhaust housing with a copy of a sierra t3 wheel.

I'll see how I go with what I have anyway, I might not have a bad turbo afterall but the PowerFC tune will determine what's wrong.

lol, I am exausted :P

I got a Wolf 3D V4 but it isnt installed yet and by what you have said GTST-VSPEC I am over the moon, I looked at a power fc and the Wolf 3D has much better features (IMO with MAP, etc) and also laptop tuning.

Good discussion guys!

/me sleeps

Evan

Hi Steve, maybe you should raise it, I would be interested in his comments.

Hi rb20 calais, I'm sorry but I can't see one area where the Wolf is better than a PFC. In a whole lot of areas it is deficient. The cold start, cold run, idle compensation (air con, power steer, electirical load etc ), closed loop cruise fuel economy, adjustable knock warning, injector load warning, adjustable acceleration enrichment for amount and decay at 5 load rpm's, adjustable water temperature correction, 40 boost versus rpm load points, etc etc

As for deleting AFM's, the truth is there is simply no better way to measure how much air is going into the engine. A MAP sensor merely measures pressure and extrapolates airflow from there, thus is nowhere near as accurate.

As for the lap top bit......... the truth is you use the lap top tuning ability very rarely, when you tune the car. But I use a Commander everyday, they are mounted in the cars permanently. Add up the cost of the digital gauges that you don't need 'cause you have a Commander.

Not that there is anything wrong with the Wolf, but it can never be as good as an ECU that is specifically designed for the car and that uses ALL the standard sensors.

Hope that explains my position

FC-EDIT I think it is called made by some blokes over in NZ. PowerFC tuning from Laptop.

I don't think it supports the R32/R33 GTST's yet but its getting their.

It isn't that expensive either especially if you are a workshop.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...