Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 335
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Dyno Dynamics can run the car all they want, what is that going to prove...? It may or may not be within the limits of the software used.

Another car that got 339rwhp = 255rwkw on your dyno manages 111mph. On the dyno i use a 200rwkw gts-t will do the same TS.

Until we have a fixed form of measuring power that is used across the country, there is no point in quoting power figures.

Wolf plugins for Skylines is about 1 year old now and was basicly the first in the range. We have things like VLs etc on the market now and the list is growing fast. Sydneykid, please check your facts before posting as you are making a lot of false statements.

Originally posted by Emre

Dyno Dynamics can run the car all they want, what is that going to prove...? It may or may not be within the limits of the software used.

Another car that got 339rwhp = 255rwkw on your dyno manages 111mph. On the dyno i use a 200rwkw gts-t will do the same TS.  

Until we have a fixed form of measuring power that is used across the country, there is no point in quoting power figures.

Yes but you arnt taking into account how bad I am at drag racing :P On the strip I never can get it right, look at my 60' times :) I need someone to be sitting in the car coaching me what to be doing and when and how, or I could let someone like rev210 or steve-sst, who know what they are doing, drive the car.

Need me to drive?

no worries rob! :P

I've actually been in Robs car, it has the power. Rob is a little too kind in shifting gears, something he can get help with I'm sure.

Rob how about giving us the 660 and 1000ft times and speeds, this will hopefully show the issue you had with the power drop.

I've actually been in Robs car, it has the power.

Being a passanger in a car that's equipped with a Trust turbo like the TD06 may give you the impression that it's fast. Unless he was having a nap on the 1-2 change, a coffee on the 2-3 change and maybe a quickie on the 3-4 change, that 111mph is a good indicator of the power. :P

He didn't have one run and pack up, he had 5-6 runs, out of which the 111mph was the best. 13.88 is obviously is slow for the mph and can be improved on but i can't see anyone else improving on the mph by more than 1-2mph.

Incidentally, do you have a graph of your dyno run Rob...?

Originally posted by Emre

Dyno Dynamics can run the car all they want, what is that going to prove...? It may or may not be within the limits of the software used.

Another car that got 339rwhp = 255rwkw on your dyno manages 111mph. On the dyno i use a 200rwkw gts-t will do the same TS.  

Until we have a fixed form of measuring power that is used across the country, there is no point in quoting power figures.

ROFL.......so you seriously think a car with a TD06 is going to produce similar power to the stock RB25 turbo?

If you are experienced in drag racing, you would know that drivers can make a massive difference in times, as dozens of other things will too.

If dyno dynamics say the dyno is reading accurately, what better comparison is there for power figures (when using shootout mode)? seriously.

Originally posted by Emre

Being a passanger in a car that's equipped with a Trust turbo like the TD06 may give you the impression that it's fast........

but you are saying that its not? I think you are completely wrong. Trust have been producing these turbos for years and sold thousands of them cos they are only as good as the stocker, but make the car feel faster????

Dyno Dynamic are forcing tough new Dyno procedures so they would not like to hear you comments. A mates car runs 11.4@112mph with 307rwhp on my dyno so a driver can have a big effect on 1/4 performance. Trust products are outstanding and been around for a long time so these comments are pointless.We will get Robs car down the 1/4 fast soon!Rob and Pauls cars are well planned cars built at a low cost and they have every right to be proud of their effort so stop grizzling and do better your self.

Yes this is true and the good thing is they acted fast and i came up clean plus GTSt Vspecs car was tested 5 days ago and after the dyno tests were done.. The new software is going to clean up the market,DD own the new procedures and will take it away from any shop tampering with it.If you think you get a fudged power run please report it even if its from me.I pushed hard to get this thru its just a pitty we can't clean up other brand dynos but they are a minority anyway.Look for Shootout accredited DD dynos Australia wide from now on to be sure you get the facts and then you can compare your car to any car featured in any mag world wide tested this way.

ROFL.......so you seriously think a car with a TD06 is going to produce similar power to the stock RB25 turbo?

You are still comparing figures taken on different dynos. How do you know a GTS-T with a stock turbo gets 200rwkw on the dyno i use?

TD06-20G can support between 380-420hp at the engine depending on the trim. It is good to see that some can manage this just on 1 bar.

If you are experienced in drag racing, you would know that drivers can make a massive difference in times

No one is looking at the times. His best mph of 111 out of 5-6 runs is a good indication of power unless he was on a leisurely drive.

If dyno dynamics say the dyno is reading accurately, what better comparison is there for power figures (when using shootout mode)? seriously

Time will tell whether the 'shootout mode' is the new form of measuring power. From what i've seen so far, we are gonna get figures similar to the ones taken in US from their DynoJets.

but you are saying that its not? I think you are completely wrong. Trust have been producing these turbos for years and sold thousands of them cos they are only as good as the stocker, but make the car feel faster????

If you are running the TD06 only on 1 bar, it'd be marginally faster than a well set-up stock turbo; however it would feel quite faster than before because of the way it spools up.

Steve-SST,

If you think the TD06 is an outstanding turbo good for you dude. I haven't knocked Pauls's or Rob's cars and efforts, if it came across that way i apologise. I've only been commenting on the power figures quoted cause it seems to be a bit high and at every where i look lately.

EDIT: And don't you worry, as soon as i get of my P's i will start to modify my car as well.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • This sounds like a perfect excuse to install a Haltech R3.
    • I do believe from context he is talking about a S0/S1 R33 RB25 with associated ECU and Wiring for that, and a manual gearbox into a R34 N/A Auto. I don't have the knowledge of all the pinouts and such but my gut feeling from doing my own conversion is to use as much of the R33 stuff that you can. The "car" wiring is quite seperate from the "Engine" wiring when all things are considered. The only things to truly consider 99% of the time is the cluster, reverse lights and potentially disabling the 'not in P/N' immobilizer circuit.
    • A realistic expectattion of how long it has to last also comes down to.... when do you think you will be banned from registering and driving old petrol powered shitters? It's 27 years since that thing was built. It probably rusted out 15 years ago. It was probably repaired and looked OK for another 10. If you do a similarish bodge job now, or perhaps slightly better with some actual rust conversion and glassing, then.... get another 10-15 years out of it, after which you'll only be permitted by the CCP to drive electric cars manufactured in their Shenzen zone anyway. 
    • Let me assume that the concern over a manual ECU is that the NeoDET that you have was an auto and has an auto ECU. That ECU will not be a problem, but you WILL have to Nistune it. And you would have to Nistune it even if you had a manual ECU, because the turbo ECUs will shit the bed if they do not have all the things that they were told they have to have, to be happy. The big one being the TCS CU, which you won't have in your car. Anyway, with an auto ECU (which I have running my originally auto NeoDET in an R32) Nistune allows you to put in a Stagea image which doesn't panic about the absent TCS, and allows you to override a whle bunch of other annoyances that would otherwise see the check engine light on 100% of the time. Also, you can't wind up the power very far on the stock NeoDET ECUs without Nistune, because the boost sensor gets in the way. Nistune allows you to push that problem much further up the dial. Do you even have the boost sensor with the engine? Without it, you are SOL and will need an aftermarket ECU (or to find a sensor somewhere, god knows where). I can't tell you what the wiring loom differences are in a 34. But what Duncan said above needs to be considered. When you say "loom", does that include the transmission loom? Because you will need to swap out the auto tranny loom for the equivalent manual loom, and get rid of the neutral/park start interlock (basically hot wire it).
    • I have had the r3c in for years now, maybe close to 7 years and it has never missed a beat, anyone can drive it. Super easy to drive around town, the hotter it gets does get a little hard but it holds the power easy as 
×
×
  • Create New...