Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 335
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

just to add a little bit more fuel to the fire, i believe Emre has a valid point here saying that the mph is an indication of the sort of power the engine is making and 111mph for ~340rwhp is quite low.

The mph (Terminal Speed) has been used many many times with great accuracy to be able to work out the amount of hp an engine is creating. Of course there are other factors like driver, traction, etc, but unless you're missing gears or having a smoke b/w gear changes, the mph/TS should be within -3 or -4 mph from the expected mph according to the power produced by the engine.

For example, a friend of mine (not the greatest driver) with a R32 GTS-T (RB20DET) producing ~290rwhp on a Dyno Dynamics ran a 13.4@111mph in full street trim with 2.5-2.7s 60ft times at Calder Park.

I'm sure that with that mph, decent slicks and hard launch he'd be able to run a low-mid 12s ET which is what you'd expect with that kind of power.

Also, another example, another friend with a VL which was producing ~190rwkw ran a 12.4@105mph. in this case, the mph definitely indicates the amount of power he was running, even though the ET is quite good which was due to a crazy 1.5s 60ft time.

therefore, what i'm trying to say is that too many people these days are coming up with these "big hp" claims but can't back them up by running the expected/appropriate ET or mph at the track.

just my 2c.

RS500, Things are never equal on a drag strip when we talking about amatuers, if we're talking about good drivers then I would agree that the mph would be a decent indicator:D Rob has 340rwhp did a 13.8@111mph, Got Boost has 344rwhp on the same dyno and did a 12.0@115mph. Both cars are making similar power, but there poles apart in mph and 1/4mile times.

not trying to be a smartass but RS500 said that its a good indication between power and MPH within 3-4mph ... now gtst vspec you say that they are miles apart with mph? as i see it the two examples you have given totally back up what RS500 was saying but it seems you were trying to prove him wrong? this doesnt make sense to me?

13.8@111mph with 340rwhp

12.0@115mph with 344rwhp

Those results show that MPH has a lot to do with the indication of power and ET has nothing to do with it (within reason).

Evan

Another thing that will make a big difference is the width of the power band, Rob said he was dropping off boost - whether it be due to the power band not being wide enough to keep the car on boost or Rob just being a bit shy - will make a huge difference.

Also weight makes a big difference, time taken to change gears.. the list goes on - All will have varying effects on the TS - add them all together and you will have unrepresentative results.

Bottom line though, well all see when Rob lets someone like Rev210 or Steve SST borrow it for a night at the plex.....

rb20, I've seen a car run 107mph with only 240rwhp, so it doesn't prove/disprove anything, except that drivers can make a big difference to both the 1/4 and mph.

Steve, Yeah, Rob's car is quite laggy, and if you don't keep the boot in it will fall off boost and you'll loose a heap of time. We'll let one of the good drag racers take it next time and see if we can't improve the time alot:D

Originally posted by RS500

just to add a little bit more fuel to the fire, i believe Emre has a valid point here saying that the mph is an indication of the sort of power the engine is making and 111mph for ~340rwhp is quite low.

therefore, what i'm trying to say is that too many people these days are coming up with these "big hp" claims but can't back them up by running the expected/appropriate ET or mph at the track.

just my 2c.

Rob's gear changes let him down. Explanation for the lowish mph given. Case closed. The turbo setup requires a good flat change or your going slower than stock. Reaching a particular mph requires 'time', less time if you have more power. If you lose time by dropping out of the power band then you lose mph ,end of story.

Agree about the 'big hp' claims and no performance issue. It's an oldie but a goodie.

hahaha honestly I can't drive for shit and its has taken me 4 meets at EC to get to a time I am half happy with and we only get 3 runs per meet, Its a bit of a cop out letting someone alse drive your car as once again why have the power if you can't use it

Hmm, well people are saying that it can't have the power with such slow times, and yet with a decent driver it will make the better times. If you want us to prove it can do it then we'll need a better driver on-board Rob's car.

Originally posted by Buster

....Its a bit of a cop out letting someone alse drive your car as once again why have the power if you can't use it

I could argue that people use the power in different ways, I am sure you dont drive your car like its on a strip every time you leave a standing start, or like its on a circuit in between ALL the time.

But the best reason I can think of is that he knows what the car is capable of, and has a goal to aspire to, ie, a time to get to so he knows he's using the cars potential.

I have never taken my car down the strip, probably never will, doesnt mean I dont enjoy driving it:)

Steve thats good and if its not your thing well its not your thing

But I had many meets that I ran low 13's with a mph of 113-114 but I fianally learnt how to launch and change gears a bit better and bang its at 122mph, Just let him take his time no one said he had to run the great time over night and when he does get it all right he'll shut everyone up thats doubting him and he will of had the self satisfaction of doing it himself

Yeah for sure, I guess we all look/think about our cars in different ways and just becuse we disagree doesn't mean we both can't be right or wrong its all good

I said that about the times and ES I ran because I don't doubt he will run a good time in the long run and I know that ES is a good indication of power once you get your 60ft down under 2 and change gears accordingly :D

Originally posted by Buster

I said that about the times and ES I ran because I don't doubt he will run a good time in the long run and I know that ES is a good indication of power once you get your 60ft down under 2 and change gears accordingly :D

Buster,

gear changes : i guess what we're trying to say is that with a decent enough launch & gear changes, the TS should be an indication of the engine's power.

Although, in Rob77's case, if the power band is very short where he drops out of the power-band after every gear change, then, that's definitely a problem for him to get the ET & TS which his car should be doing.

i would imagine that a car which is that peaky wouldn't be very nice to drive on the street.

Rob77,

we don't mean to dis-respect your car in any way dude with all this jargen above. after our discussion, i'm sure you're car is making the power you are stating, but it's unfortunate u can't extract the times & mph that it should be doing with your setup.

it looks like u might have replace the big 16cm exhaust housing to something like a 10 or 12cm.

good luck anyway dude.

Do a search on "trust td06 stage 2" that will show you my dyno graph, it has a fair wack more midrange now its been tuned. This is the first time I've been down the strip with the new setup and I'm convinced I can drive the car better after I get some more runs under my belt, but I want the track to be fully prepped before I do and I still think I'll take steve-sst or rev210 along anyway, so if I cant drive the car any better they can at least put down a more respectable time. Regardless of how it performs down the track its a 150% improvement on the stock turbo and ecu, the car puts you back into the seat nice and hard unlike the stock turbo, sure its laggy, but what larger turbo isnt.

Originally posted by GTS-t VSPEC

I did try and tell him to flat change, but alot of people are scared to hurt there car.I'm sure the car is good for a high 12, just need to let someone who doesn't care about the car have a go:D

i have NO respect for my car give me a go in your car:shake:

Quoted by Enrico Palazzo

Haha so let me get this straight. U automatically presume that cos a car has .5lt less displacement that it cant make decent power. Are u assuming that between a 3lt and 2.5lt engine that the only determinants in making power is the boost ran and engine size. That is pretty naive and stupid. U cant comapre 2 totally different engines and then say one cant make that much power cos a totally different engine mad xxxx at whatever psi. Like steve said, u just have shown australia what an idiot u r.

Settle down tiger. Having to brand someone an idiot without actually knowing that person is not necessary here. For starters you got it completely wrong.

The engine i quoted is a 2JZ with big cams and on 20 psi would inhale 230 lt/sec of air per turbo, not that far from the stock RB25 on 1 bar. That car has also put the power down on the dyno i use and pulled 129mph down the track. I would suggest it qualifies to be a reference point for me.

Power is deriven from the amount of air being consumed. If you know the certain variables, why can't you compare two different engines' performances ?

For the record, i've never said Rob's car would only have 200rwkw. I said : " On the dyno i use a 200rwkw gts-t will do the same TS." Another with 255rwkw would crack 118mph. Now, from the highly publicised news that Rob couldn't extract the full potential out of his car that night, we know there is more mph in it. How much more remain to be seen but i doubt there will be 7 extra miles in it. Dropping off power during gear changes is a little surprising as well unless the turbine is a real mismatch.

In the risk of repeating myself; all this difference of opinion is arising from incosistencies of dyno outputs. Whether it's because of shoot-out mode used or my dyno being conservative is irrelevant. If Paul's title for the thread was "123 mph from stock internals", less questions would've been asked.

IMO, the new shoot-out mode is good for dyno competitions and even if/when it becomes widely popular, there will still be some that would not use it. I will try it out next time i am on the dyno, possibly this thursday, but the actual tuning of the car will still be done the old way. The history of my car is in the dyno, as is the number of other cars' for comparison after different modifications.

Paul had compared the two below for comparison.

13.8@111mph with 340rwhp - rob77

12.0@115mph with 344rwhp - GotBoost

There is a 100kg difference in between the R32 and R33 GTR, is this the case with the GTS-T as well ?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Any update on this one? did you manage to get it fixed?    i'm having the same issue with my r34 and i believe its to do with the smart entry (keyless) control module but cant be sure without forking out to get a replacement  
    • So this being my first contribution to the SAU forums, I'd like to present and show how I had to solve probably one of the most annoying fixes on any car I've owned: replacing a speedometer (or "speedo") sensor on my newly acquired Series 1 Stagea 260RS Autech Version. I'm simply documenting how I went about to fix this issue, and as I understand it is relatively rare to happen to this generation of cars, it is a gigantic PITA so I hope this helps serve as reference to anyone else who may encounter this issue. NOTE: Although I say this is meant for the 260RS, because the gearbox/drivetrain is shared with the R33 GTR with the 5-speed manual, the application should be exactly the same. Background So after driving my new-to-me Stagea for about 1500km, one night while driving home the speedometer and odometer suddenly stopped working. No clunking noise, no indication something was broken, the speedometer would just stop reading anything and the odometer stopped going up. This is a huge worry for me, because my car is relatively low mileage (only 45k km when purchased) so although I plan to own the car for a long time, a mismatched odometer reading would be hugely detrimental to resale should the day come to sell the car. Thankfully this only occurred a mile or two from home so it wasn't extremely significant. Also, the OCD part of me would be extremely irked if the numbers that showed on my dash doesn't match the actual ageing of the car. Diagnosing I had been in communication with the well renown GTR shop in the USA, U.P.garage up near University Point in Washington state. After some back and forth they said it could be one of two things: 1) The speedometer sensor that goes into the transfer case is broken 2) The actual cluster has a component that went kaput. They said this is common in older Nissan gauge clusters and that would indicate a rebuild is necessary. As I tried to figure out if it was problem #1, I resolved problem #2 by sending my cluster over to Relentless Motorsports in Dallas, TX, whom is local to me and does cluster and ECU rebuilds. He is a one man operation who meticulously replaces every chip, resistor, capacitor, and electronic component on the PCB's on a wide variety of classic and modern cars. His specialty is Lexus and Toyota, but he came highly recommended by Erik of U.P.garage since he does the rebuilds for them on GTR clusters.  For those that don't know, on R32 and R33 GTR gearboxes, the speedometer sensor is mounted in the transfer case and is purely an analog mini "generator" (opposite of an alternator essentially). Based on the speed the sensor spins it generates an AC sine wave voltage up to 5V, and sends that via two wires up to the cluster which then interprets it via the speedometer dial. The signal does NOT go to the ECU first, the wiring goes to the cluster first then the ECU after (or so I'm told).  Problems/Roadblocks I first removed the part from the car on the underside of the transfer case (drain your transfer case fluid/ATF first, guess who found out that the hard way?), and noted the transfer case fluid was EXTREMELY black, most likely never changed on my car. When attempting to turn the gears it felt extremely gritty, as if something was binding the shaft from rotating properly. I got absolutely no voltage reading out of the sensor no matter how fast I turned the shaft. After having to reflow the solder on my AFM sensors based on another SAU guide here, I attempted to disassemble the silicone seal on the back of the sensor to see what happened inside the sensor; turns out, it basically disintegrated itself. Wonderful. Not only had the electrical components destroyed themselves, the magnetic portion on what I thought was on the shaft also chipped and was broken. Solution So solution: find a spare part right? Wrong. Nissan has long discontinued the proper sensor part number 32702-21U19, and it is no longer obtainable either through Nissan NSA or Nissan Japan. I was SOL without proper speed or mileage readings unless I figured out a way to replace this sensor. After tons of Googling and searching on SAU, I found that there IS however a sensor that looks almost exactly like the R33/260RS one: a sensor meant for the R33/R34 GTT and GTS-T with the 5 speed manual. The part number was 25010-21U00, and the body, plug, and shaft all looked exactly the same. The gear was different at the end, but knowing the sensor's gear is held on with a circlip, I figured I could just order the part and swap the gears. Cue me ordering a new part from JustJap down in Kirrawee, NSW, then waiting almost 3 weeks for shipping and customs clearing. The part finally arrives and what did I find? The freaking shaft lengths don't match. $&%* I discussed with Erik how to proceed, and figuring that I basically destroyed the sensor trying to get the shaft out of the damaged sensor from my car. we deemed it too dangerous to try and attempt to swap shafts to the correct length. I had to find a local CNC machinist to help me cut and notch down the shaft. After tons of frantic calling on a Friday afternoon, I managed to get hold of someone and he said he'd be able to do it over half a week. I sent him photos and had him take measurements to match not only the correct length and notch fitment, but also a groove to machine out to hold the retentive circlip. And the end result? *chef's kiss* Perfect. Since I didn't have pliers with me when I picked up the items, I tested the old gear and circlip on. Perfect fit. After that it was simply swapping out the plug bracket to the new sensor, mount it on the transfer case, refill with ATF/Nissan Matic Fluid D, then test out function. Thankfully with the rebuilt cluster and the new sensor, both the speedometer and odometer and now working properly!   And there you have it. About 5-6 weeks of headaches wrapped up in a 15 minute photo essay. As I was told it is rare for sensors of this generation to die so dramatically, but you never know what could go wrong with a 25+ year old car. I HOPE that no one else has to go through this problem like I did, so with my take on a solution I hope it helps others who may encounter this issue in the future. For the TL;DR: 1) Sensor breaks. 2) Find a replacement GTT/GTS-T sensor. 3) Find a CNC machinist to have you cut it down to proper specs. 4) Reinstall then pray to the JDM gods.   Hope this guide/story helps anyone else encountering this problem!
    • So this being my first contribution to the SAU forums, I'd like to present and show how I had to solve probably one of the most annoying fixes on any car I've owned: replacing a speedometer (or "speedo") sensor on my newly acquired Series 1 Stagea 260RS Autech Version. I'm simply documenting how I went about to fix this issue, and as I understand it is relatively rare to happen to this generation of cars, it is a gigantic PITA so I hope this helps serve as reference to anyone else who may encounter this issue. NOTE: Although I say this is meant for the 260RS, because the gearbox/drivetrain is shared with the R33 GTR with the 5-speed manual, the application should be exactly the same. Background So after driving my new-to-me Stagea for about 1500km, one night while driving home the speedometer and odometer suddenly stopped working. No clunking noise, no indication something was broken, the speedometer would just stop reading anything and the odometer stopped going up. This is a huge worry for me, because my car is relatively low mileage (only 45k km when purchased) so although I plan to own the car for a long time, a mismatched odometer reading would be hugely detrimental to resale should the day come to sell the car. Thankfully this only occurred a mile or two from home so it wasn't extremely significant. Also, the OCD part of me would be extremely irked if the numbers that showed on my dash doesn't match the actual ageing of the car. Diagnosing I had been in communication with the well renown GTR shop in the USA, U.P.garage up near University Point in Washington state. After some back and forth they said it could be one of two things: 1) The speedometer sensor that goes into the transfer case is broken 2) The actual cluster has a component that went kaput. They said this is common in older Nissan gauge clusters and that would indicate a rebuild is necessary. As I tried to figure out if it was problem #1, I resolved problem #2 by sending my cluster over to Relentless Motorsports in Dallas, TX, whom is local to me and does cluster and ECU rebuilds. He is a one man operation who meticulously replaces every chip, resistor, capacitor, and electronic component on the PCB's on a wide variety of classic and modern cars. His specialty is Lexus and Toyota, but he came highly recommended by Erik of U.P.garage since he does the rebuilds for them on GTR clusters.  For those that don't know, on R32 and R33 GTR gearboxes, the speedometer sensor is mounted in the transfer case and is purely an analog mini "generator" (opposite of an alternator essentially). Based on the speed the sensor spins it generates an AC sine wave voltage up to 5V, and sends that via two wires up to the cluster which then interprets it via the speedometer dial. The signal does NOT go to the ECU first, the wiring goes to the cluster first then the ECU after (or so I'm told).  Problems/Roadblocks I first removed the part from the car on the underside of the transfer case (drain your transfer case fluid/ATF first, guess who found out that the hard way?), and noted the transfer case fluid was EXTREMELY black, most likely never changed on my car. When attempting to turn the gears it felt extremely gritty, as if shttps://imgur.com/6TQCG3xomething was binding the shaft from rotating properly. After having to reflow the solder on my AFM sensors based on another SAU guide here, I attempted to disassemble the silicone seal on the back of the sensor to see what happened inside the sensor; turns out, it basically disintegrated itself. Wonderful. Not only had the electrical components destroyed themselves, the magnetic portion on what I thought was on the shaft also chipped and was broken. Solution So solution: find a spare part right? Wrong. Nissan has long discontinued the proper sensor part number 32702-21U19, and it is no longer obtainable either through Nissan NSA or Nissan Japan. I was SOL without proper speed or mileage readings unless I figured out a way to replace this sensor. After tons of Googling and searching on SAU, I found that there IS however a sensor that looks almost exactly like the R33/260RS one: a sensor meant for the R33/R34 GTT and GTS-T with the 5 speed manual. The part number was 25010-21U00, and the body, plug, and shaft all looked exactly the same. The gear was different at the end, but knowing the sensor's gear is held on with a circlip, I figured I could just order the part and swap the gears. Cue me ordering a new part from JustJap down in Kirrawee, NSW, then waiting almost 3 weeks for shipping and customs clearing. The part finally arrives and what did I find? The freaking shaft lengths don't match. $&%* I discussed with Erik how to proceed, and figuring that I basically destroyed the sensor trying to get the shaft out of the damaged sensor from my car. we deemed it too dangerous to try and attempt to swap shafts to the correct length. I had to find a local CNC machinist to help me cut and notch down the shaft. After tons of frantic calling on a Friday afternoon, I managed to get hold of someone and he said he'd be able to do it over half a week. I sent him photos and had him take measurements to match not only the correct length and notch fitment, but also a groove to machine out to hold the retentive circlip. And the end result? *chef's kiss* Perfect. Since I didn't have pliers with me when I picked up the items, I tested the old gear and circlip on. Perfect fit. After that it was simply swapping out the plug bracket to the new sensor, mount it on the transfer case, refill with ATF/Nissan Matic Fluid D, then test out function. Thankfully with the rebuilt cluster and the new sensor, both the speedometer and odometer and now working properly!   And there you have it. About 5-6 weeks of headaches wrapped up in a 15 minute photo essay. As I was told it is rare for sensors of this generation to die so dramatically, but you never know what could go wrong with a 25+ year old car. I HOPE that no one else has to go through this problem like I did, so with my take on a solution I hope it helps others who may encounter this issue in the future. For the TL;DR: 1) Sensor breaks. 2) Find a replacement GTT/GTS-T sensor. 3) Find a CNC machinist to have you cut it down to proper specs. 4) Reinstall then pray to the JDM gods.   Hope this guide/story helps anyone else encountering this problem!
    • perhaps i should have mentioned, I plugged the unit in before i handed over to the electronics repair shop to see what damaged had been caused and the unit worked (ac controls, rear demister etc) bar the lights behind the lcd. i would assume that the diode was only to control lighting and didnt harm anything else i got the unit back from the electronics repair shop and all is well (to a point). The lights are back on and ac controls are working. im still paranoid as i beleive the repairer just put in any zener diode he could find and admitted asking chatgpt if its compatible   i do however have another issue... sometimes when i turn the ignition on, the climate control unit now goes through a diagnostics procedure which normally occurs when you disconnect and reconnect but this may be due to the below   to top everything off, and feel free to shoot me as im just about to do it myself anyway, while i was checking the newly repaired board by plugging in the climate control unit bare without the housing, i believe i may have shorted it on the headunit surround. Climate control unit still works but now the keyless entry doesnt work along with the dome light not turning on when you open the door. to add to this tricky situation, when you start the car and remove the key ( i have a turbo timer so car remains on) the keyless entry works. the dome light also works when you switch to the on position. fuses were checked and all ok ive deduced that the short somehow has messed with the smart entry control module as that is what controls the keyless entry and dome light on door opening   you guys wouldnt happen to have any experience with that topic lmao... im only laughing as its all i can do right now my self diagnosed adhd always gets me in a situation as i have no patience and want to get everything done in shortest amount of time as possible often ignoring crucial steps such as disconnecting battery when stuffing around with electronics or even placing a simple rag over the metallic headunit surround when placing a live pcb board on top of it   FML
    • Bit of a pity we don't have good images of the back/front of the PCB ~ that said, I found a YT vid of a teardown to replace dicky clock switches, and got enough of a glimpse to realize this PCB is the front-end to a connected to what I'll call PCBA, and as such this is all digital on this PCB..ergo, battery voltage probably doesn't make an appearance here ; that is, I'd expect them to do something on PCBA wrt power conditioning for the adjustment/display/switch PCB.... ....given what's transpired..ie; some permutation of 12vdc on a 5vdc with or without correct polarity...would explain why the zener said "no" and exploded. The transistor Q5 (M33) is likely to be a digital switching transistor...that is, package has builtin bias resistors to ensure it saturates as soon as base threshold voltage is reached (minimal rise/fall time)....and wrt the question 'what else could've fried?' ....well, I know there's an MCU on this board (display, I/O at a guess), and you hope they isolated it from this scenario...I got my crayons out, it looks a bit like this...   ...not a lot to see, or rather, everything you'd like to see disappears down a via to the other side...base drive for the transistor comes from somewhere else, what this transistor is switching is somewhere else...but the zener circuit is exclusive to all this ~ it's providing a set voltage (current limited by the 1K3 resistor R19)...and disappears somewhere else down the via I marked V out ; if the errant voltage 'jumped' the diode in the millisecond before it exploded, whatever that V out via feeds may have seen a spike... ....I'll just imagine that Q5 was switched off at the time, thus no damage should've been done....but whatever that zener feeds has to be checked... HTH
×
×
  • Create New...