Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 75
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

SHOOT CONTACT PAGES ARE UP!!!! (without any editing, the pics will b edited after they are chosen)

http://www.flickr.com/photos/mkphotographyperth

GO THERE AND CHOSE WHAT CAR IS YOURS THEN CLICK ON THE IMAGE THEN GO TO ALL SIZES THEN CHOSE THE ORIGINAL SIZE AND HAVE A LOOK THROUGH THE PICTURES.

IF YOU FIND IT HARD TO KNOW WHICH PICTURE LOOKS BEST BUT YOU WANT ONE THAT LOOKS LIKE A FEW, SELECT A RANGE AND I WILL LOOK AT THE ORIGINAL SIZES AND PICK THE BEST LOOKING ONE!!!

PM ME THE FILE NAME (FOUND UNDER EACH THUMBNAIL)

HOPE YOU HAD FUN!!!

ADD ME ON MSN IF YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND OR YOU WANT TO TALK ABOUT A CERTAIN PIC ETC.

[email protected]

(contact sheets will be up till next sunday first to contact me, first to get pictures edited)

was good, the chicks bailed before i could get pics with just them and my car :blink: haha next time, cheers Rob

sorry about that man, got a bit confusing near the end because the models had to bail. but they have confirmed that they are willing to do another shoot with us coz they had so much fun will be taking bookings again soon :D

better pick a better time of the day to do it next time. Exposure is all wrong due to the harsh light which makes it hard for the tog.

The cars in the bg and reflections aren't good either...gotta setup a bit better and frame the shot. Use some remote fill flashes, the models and car weren't exposed right.

just giving some advice on photo taking not editing. you can probably edit like a guru in ps or lr but if you take the photo right at the start it' less time fiddling in software.

random cars or ppl in the bg and shadows on the models' faces with over exposed cars can mostly be recovered but why make it hard for ya :yes:

i can show u some examples if ya want?

just giving some advice on photo taking not editing. you can probably edit like a guru in ps or lr but if you take the photo right at the start it' less time fiddling in software.

random cars or ppl in the bg and shadows on the models' faces with over exposed cars can mostly be recovered but why make it hard for ya :D

i can show u some examples if ya want?

this is true it was suppose to b overcast that day so didnt really plan for 100% blue skies lol we are going to do another one and will be more concious of what you have said thankyou

  • 2 weeks later...
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to !
    • As I've said elsewhere, I am using the stock intercooler piping path in the engine bay, and a return flow cooler, and making ~250 rwkW (without any effort put into trying to turn it up past there just yet) and expect to be able to make some more, and frankly, I would be perfectly happy with 260-270rwKW. This is peak road Skyline usability territory. You go past there and, sure, the car will snap necks more when it's on boost, but it will also break shit all the time, cost a (even larger) fortune in tyres, etc etc. Anyway, I also do not like the over-the-fan pipe path, and you don't have to do it.
    • I see, honestly I’m not too fussed about the looks. The only reason to go plenum is to make the piping easier instead of the classic over the rad etc. 
    • Not easy to quantify wrt something like how many fractions of a second slower it would be over 0-100. But given that a 250-300rwkW car is able to do that launch sprint in 5-6 sec (and faster with appropriate tyres, and surface)..... giving up as much as a second would feel like torture. A ~450HP capable turbo is not going to make lots of boost in the 2000-3000 rpm range. So, whilst with some boost on hand it will be faster accelerating in that rev range than your engine currently is NA, it will not feel like a fast car until the boost is solidly in. You know what your car feels like right now when you open it up at 2000rpm. if you've ever been in an actual fast car, you will appreciate that the NARB25 is.... not exciting. Well, add some boost and it will be better. But shorten the intake runners and it might not be better at all. It might come out better, but it could end up feeling the same. For me, it's not the 0-X km/h sprints that matter. It is easy to fry the tyres with anything over 200 rwkW. You can't use all the power available in 1st and 2nd anyway, you have to modulate the throttle. What matters is how the car reacts when you're driving in traffic in 4th or 5th and have maybe 2000 rpm on board, and you want/need to add some speed quickly, and don't have time for the downshift. It won't make boost, it will be all NA (at the speeds we're talking about - remember how fast you're going at 2000 in 4th! and don't plan on breaking the limit by too much.) So giving away NA torque is not what I would consider practical for a street car. And retaining that NA torque builds boost faster which makes the car faster. The flashy plenum is not actually better, unless you're looking at a track car where you can keep it on the boil all the time.  
    • So how much difference does it make you think? Like 1 second in the 0-100?  I was have smaller turbo so hopefully that spools quick GTX2871.  currently it’s NA so you can imagine pretty slow, but I do want fast accusation a little as there’s not many places I’ll be driving where I go over 80 even near me. So 0-60 and 0-80 targets   
×
×
  • Create New...