Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 505
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I really like the SAUQLD one can you email it to me so i can print it off [email protected]

* MEETING AT VILI'S THIS WEDNESDAY NIGHT AT 8PM SHARP INSIDE THE CAFE *

Edited by Bunny33
SAUQLD stickers look like arse with a pinch of feet (like something someone created in Microsoft Word). Stick to the NSW/VIC ones, which use the GTR logo and the website's logo.
I really like the SAUQLD one can you email it to me so i can print it off [email protected]

Yeh agree with Shan, the QLD ones aren't that flash... i like our creations better.

I so want one

just for the sticker Im in !! needs to be SAU:SA in my opinion, affiliated right here.

backing whoever drives it all the way - go for it !!

you would think we could come up with something better????,, that is average at best

even the SAU logo is lame in my book

but majority rules will decide I guess

I personally agree.. but its the majority of votes and it seems in favour. :(

Well, we had our meeting last night. Thanks to those who attended.

Not much can or will be said right now as we are nutting out the structure and requirements of the club after our little brainstorm session. Once we have things a bit more solid, we'll be advising further. A few of us just have a lot of homework to do :D

What I can say is that a revision of the logo was discussed and fresh ideas came up. The club name will now be StagLineSA or StagLine Club SA. We tried SkyStagSA, but StagLineSA rolls off the tongue better :P

This will be an official club, not a general gathering of import owners, so there will be membership requirements. Our aim is to build a club of Skyline and Stagea enthusiasts with a respectable reputation where members want to be involved in events, not just attend them. We do not want a club that ends up like RCK.

Kell, Krishy, Luke, I reckon we do our homework and meet again to see how its pulling together and then get the ball rolling and go thru with a few of those ideas we came up with :yes: Further, I will email you a list of notes of what I've come up with overnight, as well as a structure for that 'other' thing ;) (this will need to be fine tuned as we go). I reckon when we have something more solid after our next meeting, we start a fresh thread announcing the new club.

Edited by RubyRS4
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Kapr Haha yeah thats the one. I missed that you had a built up engine, I wouldn't want to run it on there either then. It was good in my situation just to replace the original turbo on a stock engine. @MBS206Yep definitely not a replacement for anything name brand
    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
×
×
  • Create New...