Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

im assuming you have a 3076 dyno print out to compare to mine?

Here's one RB25DETS2 referred to:

post-a216081-HKS3037vsGT3582.jpg

The HKS GT3037 makes 180rwkw ~600rpm earlier than the GT35R, and thats loaded up on the dyno - not taking into account the better response resultant from having less inertia to deal with.

or is all that just your personal opinion without actually owning one? spongier? the host is asking about drag racing not going shopping

Its after driving and/or being passenger in a few cars with .82a/r GT3582Rs as well as my own with .82a/r GT30R. I haven't owned a .82a/r GT35R, as I was targetting around 300rwkw and I seems stupid to me to buy a turbo suited for far more when you don't intend on making far more. I think GT35R are good for the power level they are suited for, but this guy has said clearly he wants to run up to 1.3bar on stock internals - so there is absolutely no advantage in going to a GT35R though even in drag racing with stock cams etc it will be that much harder to get a clean launch and if he doesn't get up in the revs/through the gears swiftly enough he has the potential for that much less punch into the next gear.

You seem to be getting quite irate about it? Its nothing personal, just sheer logic that a turbo best suited to 280-300rwkw is better suited to 280-300rwkw than one suited to mid/high 300rwkw. Why would you try and convince someone with size 10 feet to buy size 12 shoes?

Edited by Lithium
  • Replies 84
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

3076 could be the go then...internal have no dramas holding 1.3-1.4bar?

aslong as you make up a nice bellmouth style dump it holds boost fine. i'm running 17psi with a profec and it holds fine. when i first got it all together i still had a turbotech manual controller, that didnt work too well.....20psi untuned ftl

aslong as you make up a nice bellmouth style dump it holds boost fine. i'm running 17psi with a profec and it holds fine. when i first got it all together i still had a turbotech manual controller, that didnt work too well.....20psi untuned ftl

GT30 rear or rb25 style rear?

aslong as you make up a nice bellmouth style dump it holds boost fine. i'm running 17psi with a profec and it holds fine. when i first got it all together i still had a turbotech manual controller, that didnt work too well.....20psi untuned ftl

a good split dump will hold fine too. I am using a split and it holds sweet all the way

im curious as to the dyno graph why is the total speed at redline so much different?

is this 4th gear with the 30 and 5th gear with the 35?

surely he isnt reving it past 8k?

this may even the ramp onto boost up a little..

Have to double check with adrian but i think his spins to 7800, mines limited 7250.

Don't think that rpm on the dyno chart is accurate somehow....Both cars dyno'd in 4th gear.

Edited by RB25DETS2

Hey Darren

I wouldnt read too much into that graph, rev limiter was set to 7600, it did hit it hard tho, also it was crazy rich on the ramp so it's not a fair comparison.

the response of the gt30 running that sorta boost is very hard to get to the ground, not my cupa tea!!!!

Hey Darren

I wouldnt read too much into that graph, rev limiter was set to 7600, it did hit it hard tho, also it was crazy rich on the ramp so it's not a fair comparison.

the response of the gt30 running that sorta boost is very hard to get to the ground, not my cupa tea!!!!

Yeah you got grip i'm jealous. I'm learning to get it to the ground tho with very moderate throttle imputs. I'm over mashing it and leaving 3rd gear strips down the road (sometimes anyway). Nothing wrong with response tho, excellent turbo for 2.5ltr imo.

Edited by RB25DETS2

Power not getting to the ground is more about driver/tyres/suspension and so on.

Especially around the 250-300rwkw mark. I drive 280rwkw, and have next to no traction problems in any setup ive had (GT30 was 270rwkw, GT-SS's are around the same)

Power not getting to the ground is more about driver/tyres/suspension and so on.

Especially around the 250-300rwkw mark. I drive 280rwkw, and have next to no traction problems in any setup ive had (GT30 was 270rwkw, GT-SS's are around the same)

Why do you keep saying the things that I was thinking :cool: I wrote exactly the same response, remembered those guys are both making north of 330wkw and decided that maybe mine would be different with that power and decided to hold my tongue just in case when I make bigged numbers the car becomes useless haha. With 280rwkw however, my car is perfectly controllable - sure an "iffy" condition surface will result in traction loss in 3rd if you are being an animal but overall its quite useable.

Why do you keep saying the things that I was thinking :cool: I wrote exactly the same response, remembered those guys are both making north of 330wkw and decided that maybe mine would be different with that power and decided to hold my tongue just in case when I make bigged numbers the car becomes useless haha. With 280rwkw however, my car is perfectly controllable - sure an "iffy" condition surface will result in traction loss in 3rd if you are being an animal but overall its quite useable.

Any surface in third with anymore than quarter to half throttle coming onto boost results in wheelspin. When i was running 274rwkw i had no issues with wheelspin in third and second was quite controllable as you and Nismoid are finding.

Been actually thinking of running off the 18psi actuator for a lazy 300-320 to see if its any better in the traction stakes.

Any surface in third with anymore than quarter to half throttle coming onto boost results in wheelspin. When i was running 274rwkw i had no issues with wheelspin in third and second was quite controllable as you and Nismoid are finding.

Been actually thinking of running off the 18psi actuator for a lazy 300-320 to see if its any better in the traction stakes.

Read again mate i'm having issues in third at 350rwkw

270 and you loose traction in 3rd?

wow... i can full throttle and never loose grip by 3rd

Not sure who you are pointing that at but as I said, when I have issues in 3rd its due to compromised traction levels - a cold NZ evening where there has been rain at some point during the day even if the road appears dry is one such situation. I was just saying its POSSIBLE to have it being a bit of a handful (not counting going out in rain which is a given haha)

The car doesn't have ridiculously traction, most people are impressed at how much in gear acceleration it can pull on street tyres - usually it can take pretty much full throttle in 2nd and it will just writhe a bit, not so much you need to lift off. First gear is useless at over half throttle.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My guesstimate, with no real numbers to back it up, is it won't effect it greatly at all.its not a huge change in position, and I can't see the air flow changing from in turbulence that much based on distance, and what's in front of it. Johnny and Brad may have some more numbers to share from experience though.
    • Which solenoid? Why was it changed? Again, why was this done? ...well, these wear..but ultimately, why was it changed? Did you reset the idle voltage level after fitment? I'm just a tad confused ~ the flash code doesn't allude to these items being faulty, so in my mind the only reason to change these things, would be some drive-ability issue....and if that's the case, what was the problem? Those questions aside, check if the dropping resistor is OK ...should be 11~14 ohms (TCU doesn't throw a flash code for this) ~ also, these TCU designs have full time power (to keep fault code RAM alive), and I think that'll throw a logic code (as opposed to the 10 hardware codes), if that power is missing (or the ram has gone bad in the TCU, which you can check..but that's another story here perhaps).
    • Question for people who "know stuff" I am looking at doing the new intake like the one in the picture (the pictured is designed for the OEM TB and intake plenum), this design has the filter behind the front bar, but, the filter sits where the OEM duct heads into the front bar, and the standard aperture when the OEM ducting is removed allows the filter to pulled back out of the front bar into the engine bay for servicing, a simple blanking plate is used to seal the aperture behind the filter This will require a 45° silicone hose from the TB, like the alloy pipe that is currently there, to another 45° silicone hose to get a straight run to the aperture in the front bar Question: how will it effect the tune if I move the MAF about 100-150mm forward, the red is around where my MAF is currently, and the green would be where it would end up Like this This is the hole the filter goes through  Ends up like this LOL..Cheers    
    • Despite the level up question, actually I do know what that is....it is a pressure sender wire.  So check out around the oil filter for an oil pressure sender, or maybe fuel pressure near the filter or on the engine. Possibly but less likely coolant pressure sensor because they tend to be combined temp/pressure senders if you have one. Could also be brake pressure (in a brake line somewhere pre ABS) but maybe I'm the only one that has that on a skyline.
    • Pull codes via the self-diagnosis procedure. As far as I can tell this is just a sign of transmission issues but not a code unto itself.
×
×
  • Create New...