Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Wondering if some of the guys that know a bit about tuning ECU's in general could help me out here. I can't find any info on this.

I've nearly finished setting up the launch control and antilag setup in the car through the AUX input on the LT12S. Now the problem is, currently this AUX input is being used for the aircon adjustment. When the aircon switches on, the AUX input is triggered and adjusts the tune with the following:

Adds air through the cold bypass valve by 0.86

Adds fuel by 0.05

Adds timing by +02 degrees

Now if i get rid of this in favour of the launch control/antilag, what effect will that have on the car with the aircon on and giving it some stick?

I don't care to much if the car has a bit of trouble idling with the aircon on as i can simply turn the aircon off when coming to a stop. The main thing im worried about is whether the engine will start pinging with the aircon on if i give it some. It's only giving it a tiny bit of fuel and 2 degrees of timing, surely if that wasn't there it wouldn't effect it too much......

Do you guys that tune cars notice much of a difference in the tune with the aircon on, will it start pinging noticably if you havent tuned the AUX map for it?

Some extra info would be good, that way i dont have to worry about the car running the aircon without it having any adjustments to the map.

I might just turn all those values to zero and take it for a drive tomorrow during the day with the aircon on and see how it goes. Would rather get some insight into it first though.

Cheers guys :down:

Edited by PM-R33

those settings would only effect the idle and low rpm cruising. if you cut the aux and use it for anti-lag it sould be ok. if anything -2 deg of timing will make you lose power on boost not cause pinging.

try it and see how you go.

My aircon switches off if you give it some anyway

it think they all do over a certain TP %

and why do you want antilag?????

doesnt yours make full boost at 2500rpm

hardly lag if you ask me

Edited by Haines

Couldn't have said it better myself :)

Nah i really don't care about the anti lag, mainly want it for the launch control having it holding at a certain rpm with the foot flat. 1.5 bar is by 3500rpm, so yeah, obviously no lag.

Thanks Guilt-Toy, ill play around with it this weekend.

Edited by PM-R33

With your MT it just senses the Aircon clutch line to trigger the aux input, then add's some extra air via the idle solenoid, adds some fuel and adds 2 deg of timing. Purely for keeping the idle nice really. There is no full throttle cutout, unless its built into the factory wiring, which it is not from memory...... So unlike more capable computers, the aircon will stay on.. (unless you have piggybacked it to the std ecu ????)

Anyway, its pretty limited, but you would just drop the rpmlimit "inpRPMlim" to suit what you need , and id play with the timing "inpTiming" , retarding it some to aide boost to build on the limiter. I would set the "inpAIRadd" to 0 (as its not enough for proper antilag, and for launch control , your flat out on the throttle already.) Probably leave fuel "inpEnrich" alone too... or add abit . Be prepared to change a few plugs as you foul them trying to get it all right.

Guilttoy could share some figures of timing retard and fuel add as he has it running on his car and is more authoritative than i on the subject ..... guilt ??...

Gary

With your MT it just senses the Aircon clutch line to trigger the aux input, then add's some extra air via the idle solenoid, adds some fuel and adds 2 deg of timing. Purely for keeping the idle nice really. There is no full throttle cutout, unless its built into the factory wiring, which it is not from memory...... So unlike more capable computers, the aircon will stay on.. (unless you have piggybacked it to the std ecu ????)

Anyway, its pretty limited, but you would just drop the rpmlimit "inpRPMlim" to suit what you need , and id play with the timing "inpTiming" , retarding it some to aide boost to build on the limiter. I would set the "inpAIRadd" to 0 (as its not enough for proper antilag, and for launch control , your flat out on the throttle already.) Probably leave fuel "inpEnrich" alone too... or add abit . Be prepared to change a few plugs as you foul them trying to get it all right.

Guilttoy could share some figures of timing retard and fuel add as he has it running on his car and is more authoritative than i on the subject ..... guilt ??...

Gary

Cheers Gary, ill have a play with it this weekend. On the microtech forums they have some values to use, so i'll just see how the car behaves to it. The limiter function is the main thing i want, ill try the antilag, but it's just going to be wheel spin city :ninja: Plugs are cheap at work so that's all good.

Phil you keep mentioning antilag like its a selectable feature on the MT ?? Have i missed something here ?

The aux revlimiter, combined with the + or - fuel and + or - timing is basics needed, but there isnt a special feature that allows setting tps thresholds , timers etc etc ..

I only ask as your talking like its a selectable feature on the MT, just making sure its not something new...

You'd love a new G4 Link plugin for things to tinker with ! Makes the MT look archaic, and im being nice. :ninja:

Gary

So hows the head going ? reckon it was worth it all ? to me it seems more suited to a larger turbo, but for under 300 not really worth it.

What about off boost responce or fuel eccon , anything change ? Noticable fueling changes in any areas ?

Gary

Well with the antilag im setting it up to a push button switch that gives the ECU 12V on the aux input. When the button is held down i can have the RPM limit i want and set the fuel and timing up so antilag can be achieved if desired. Have the car in gear, holding the foot flat, then when the clutch is dropped release the switch. It's not a true antilag i suppose, but still allows boost to built while standing still and shoot flames. Like i said, that's not why im doing it, mainly want the RPM limiter but ill play with the antilag.

That's how the guys on the microtech forums are doing it, or having it set off the clutch switch.

http://www.microtechefi.com/forum/viewtopi...ghlight=antilag There's a quick thread there. There are better ones.

Yeah head is good. Well i took the head off to do the valve springs, while it was off i figured i might aswell have it rebuilt, ported, polished and the valve seats cut . Only ended up costing me $1250 for the labour and new guides, seals etc so it wasn't that bad. If i ever do a RB30 conversion atleast the head will be nicely done.

Boost response is amazing, have 1.5bar (full boost) at around 3500rpm, fuel economy aint too bad but its hard to drive around off boost with it being so responsive. Meh gets me to uni and work, can't complain.

Edited by PM-R33

Well i hooked it all up and it works sweet. Just a note if any one is going to do it on the LT12S with the RB25 harness. Normally you give +12V to the aux input to turn it on, however with the RB25 harness originally controlling the aircon you have to give it an earth instead.

I hooked up a missile switch in the centre compartment to arm it, then i took out the antenna switch on the dash next to the steering wheel (I don't ever use it and am going to shave the aerial off anyway), hollowed it out and fitted a push button switch to activate the launch control. With it held down it limits the RPM perfectly and makes some extremely loud limiter noises lol.

I'm going to go out somewhere private and play around with the fuel and timing settings to see how the car reacts. At the moment i havnt added any fuel to it, just pulled back 10 degrees timing to be a bit safe.

Edited by PM-R33

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
    • I haven’t yet cut the chassis, maybe I switch to a reverse flow. I’ve got the Intercooler mounted as I already had it but not cut yet. Might have to speak to an engineer 
    • Yes that’s another issue, I always have a front mount, plus will be turbo plus intake will big hasstle. I’ve been told if it looks stock they’re fine with it by a couple others who have done it ahahaha.    I know @Kinkstaah said the stock gtt airbox is limiting but I might just have to do that to avoid a defect so it atleast looks legit. Or an enclosed pod so it’s hidden away and feed air from the snorkel and below Intercooler holes like kinstaah mentioned. Hmm what to do 
×
×
  • Create New...