Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey Guys,

A mate of mine just had his timing belt,w/pump, idlers etc on his R32 replaced by a local mechanic. Anyways two days later he noticed a rubbing noise coming out from under the timing cover. We pull it off, and where the belt runs on the cam pulleys, it is hanging over by about 3-4mm....

We assumed the tension was wrong ,so we reset the tension on the timing belt...but turned the engine over by hand a few times, and within about 5 turns the belt had already started working its way off the cam pulleys..finally it gets to where its about 4mm off then runs steady and doesnt go any further, but our concern is that it may start to wear the belt abnormally quick..

Is this the result of the belt not being tensioned correctly the first time and wearing the belt??

If so he should replace the belt?(car has done about 50kms since th eservice)

Is it the tensioner hasnt been installed properly?

Or is it something more sinister??

If anyone has experienced this before, or has some insight it would be much appreciated!!

Thanks all,

Ben

Edited by Benzy
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/265734-timing-belt-problems/
Share on other sites

Timing belts always track to one side due to the way the tensile cords are put in the belt. The flanges on pulleys/sprockets are what keep the belt from tracking off. The distance between the flanges will be less than the width of the other pulleys in the system.

So I would assume that the problem is something to do with the flagnes, ie the crank pulley as already mentioned. The other cause for the belt tracking incorrectly is misaligned pulleys. Being an engine though this shouldn't normally be an issue unless things haven't been installed correctly. The crank pulley is pushed/pressed on from memory so maybe it just isn't pushed on far enough?

Tension does not make the belt run off of the edge of a pulley.

Either way you don't want the belt running off of the edge of a pulley as it will reduce the belts life.

Thanks for the responses guys, had a quick squiz this morning, and It looks like the crank TIMING PULLEY could be on too far ?? The gaurd that slips on behind the main pulley is extremley loose (1-2mm play) And just by looking at the belt, it appears to twist back slightly under the tensioner and idler....

But how could that timing pulley move back towards the block? As the mechanic wouldnt have had to touch it..

Only other thing it could be is the main pulley isnt on far enough..(as mentioned above, cheers) ill get a torque wrench and check it this arvo...

Ill get a laser pulley aligner from work too and check they are all level..

But if the bottom timing pulley HAS moved, where do we go from there?? Anyone else ever had this problem??

Any insight is much appreciated,

Thanks again, Ben

Thanks for the responses guys, had a quick squiz this morning, and It looks like the crank TIMING PULLEY could be on too far ?? The gaurd that slips on behind the main pulley is extremley loose (1-2mm play) And just by looking at the belt, it appears to twist back slightly under the tensioner and idler....

Something is seriously wrong here and your mate shouldn't drive the car or even run the engine until it's been properly investigated. From your description it sounds as if the harmonic balancer hasn't been tensioned correctly or something has been mis-assembled in that area. If it were me I'd be taking the harmonic balancer off, plus all the timing covers and have close look at everything. Certainly if the belt has been rubbing on the covers (or anything else) you should be inspecting it for damage and possibly even replacing it entirely.

Also find another mechanic......

Yep. Car is never going back to that mechanic... Ok, harmonic balancer is now off, I have checked the engine manual, but cant see anything wrong, apart from the timing pulley doesnt meet the keyway on the shaft...if you get what i mean...The keyway ends then 2mm gap then timing pulley....Is it meant to meet it?? Yep,Have already orderd a new gates racing belt.

Edited by Benzy

Problem SOLVED!!! MECHANIC DIDNT TIGHTEN THE HARMONIC BALANCER!!! After we pulled it off, fitted the new belt and refitted the balancer it tightened the whole way up to the timing pulley. Very relieved. no more overhang..Needless to say, the mechanic is going to be paying us for the replacement belt! Thanks heaps to everone who offered insight and advice both here and via PM. Couldnt ask for a better outcome

Cheers,

Ben

The harmonic balancer bolt on the RB26 needs to be tightened very tight. About double your average balancer bolt tension. From memory its up around 420 ft-lb. If it wasnt tightened correctly then that could have caused it to come loose.

Deren

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...