Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Started a rb26 (R33) today "on the ground" from Japan.... Engine sounded good,revved out good, oil pressure was about 65psi when now started and went to 95psi or so when revved. Also was able to see about 10-11psi boost when revved hard,Is this too high for a stand still rev?

My main concern tho is after running the engine for about 5 mins i did a compression test with results as follows:

1--- 175

2--- 174

3--- 176

4--- 171

5--- 160

6--- 161

Now the R33 manual said the standard value is 170 psi and minimum vale was 128 psi with a variance between cylinders of 14psi

Are cylinders 1 2 3 too high? thus givin me a variance of 16psi across 3 & 5?

Probably with some running it will work in a little?

Don't know how long the engine was parked up for.

Also did a test on a running R33 RB26 (25 000km) as follows:

1--- 162

2--- 165

3--- 170

4--- 166

5--- 170

6--- 162

This looks a little more normal to me :)

What do u guys think about the first set of results?!?

Thanks.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/266524-rb26-compression/
Share on other sites

Started a rb26 (R33) today "on the ground" from Japan.... Engine sounded good,revved out good, oil pressure was about 65psi when now started and went to 95psi or so when revved. Also was able to see about 10-11psi boost when revved hard,Is this too high for a stand still rev?

My main concern tho is after running the engine for about 5 mins i did a compression test with results as follows:

1--- 175

2--- 174

3--- 176

4--- 171

5--- 160

6--- 161

Now the R33 manual said the standard value is 170 psi and minimum vale was 128 psi with a variance between cylinders of 14psi

Are cylinders 1 2 3 too high? thus givin me a variance of 16psi across 3 & 5?

Probably with some running it will work in a little?

Don't know how long the engine was parked up for.

Also did a test on a running R33 RB26 (25 000km) as follows:

1--- 162

2--- 165

3--- 170

4--- 166

5--- 170

6--- 162

This looks a little more normal to me :)

What do u guys think about the first set of results?!?

Thanks.

I'd make a few suggestions.

1. You are worrying about it too much

2. Your compression gauge is not that acurate to tell you 176 it would be 175.

3. If it's straight off the boat and has made the trip over, chances are the battery is not too crash hot, and if you didn't use a really good jump pack for the test then the battery is likely to be getting tired by 5 and 6 anyway.

4. Did you keep the throttle open while cranking during the test?

If u know the price we pay 4 a Rb26 on this side of globe u would worry too!

Its the same gauge i used 4 all 6 cylinders so i would expect some kind of consistency.

The engine was started outside of a car "on the ground" using a battery from a working vehicle and i actually thought it was getting tired too, so replaced it with another batt from another vehicle to test 5 & 6 and got the same results.

Yes had the throttle open.

i would not worry about it. the engine is fine. make sure you use GOOD oil. Motul 300v chrono if you want the engine to last.

btw make sure you dont ping this one :)

I use Redline oils engine/gearbox/diff so i should be good to go.

Don"t think i'll be experimenting too much with this one tho....just 14psi and drive :)

On that note what do u think about using a SAFC2 to "tune" it a little at the 14psi??? since i already have it.

I use Redline oils engine/gearbox/diff so i should be good to go.

Don"t think i'll be experimenting too much with this one tho....just 14psi and drive :)

On that note what do u think about using a SAFC2 to "tune" it a little at the 14psi??? since i already have it.

DO NOT TOUCH IT. chuck the safc2 in the bin. the rb26 computer will be more then capable of running the engine with heaps more power then what you were used to.

enjoy the motor, it will be good. don't destroy it like our 300kw stagea kid in the other thread lol

90% of engine failures are from the user.

Geeze.... just askin :)

Never seen anyone here use a SAFC2 on a Rb26 and i sure was'nt going to be the first!......

So 14psi good?

put the engine in and run it on no more then 10psi to start with. make sure everything is running fine. run no more then 13psi and you should be fine.

i also suggest putting a afr meter on it and checking the afr's

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • All trim back in wired running driving. Few things to follow up on but not far off the return to the road. att.6HN4wP38LTIOISkhA8eACoBFqzfgQMahZPLA8ut0pqE.mp4 att.w2q0ux2PGuqgQTj2Os13cNHQtqcSEcCAhD_CAXy_IQM.mp4
    • The trouble with phone apps is that they really do not know the sensitivity of the mic on each specific phone, whether there is some sort of cover or skin that can change that, etc etc. So the readings off them are not calibrated. You certainly couldn't be sure that you were even within 3 dB. I have the same app on two (actually more than that) different phones/tablets and the readings in the same room at the same time are never the same. I don't mind the apps - they are as useful as a dyno - if you're testing for delta from thing1 to thing2. But not to try to generate some sort of absolute value.
    • I'm gonna use the "Sound Meter" app from the Google Play Store and as close as I can bother to these procedures: 4. TEST METHOD FOR ALL VEHICLES EXCEPT PRE ADR83 IN-SERVICE GOODS VEHICLES AND OMNIBUSES 4.1 Microphone position 4.1.1 The microphone shall be directed towards the orifice of the exhaust outlet and shall be supported by a tripod or similar device not providing excessive acoustic reflection. The general requirements for positioning microphones are shown in the Appendix. 4.1.2 The nominal axis of maximum sensitivity of the microphone shall be substantially parallel to the test site surface and shall make an angle of 45 degrees ±10 degrees with the principal direction of gas flow from the exhaust. 4.1.3 In selecting the 45 degree alignment from the outlet of a motor vehicle fitted with two or more outlets, only the angle resulting in the microphone being farthest from any other outlet must be used. National Stationary Exhaust Noise Test Procedures for In-Service Motor Vehicles Page 3 4.1.4 The height of the microphone above the test site surface shall be equal to that of the orifice of the exhaust outlet ±25mm but shall not be less than 200mm above the test site surface. 4.1.5 The distance of the microphone from the exhaust outlet orifice shall be 500mm±25mm. 4.1.6 [Relates to vertical exhaust outlets] 4.1.7 For vehicles fitted with one exhaust outlet the microphone shall be placed so that the greatest possible distance is achieved between it and the vehicle. 4.1.8 [Relates to multi exhaust outlets] 4.1.9 [Relates to multi exhaust outlets] TLDR: 200mm off ground 45 degree angle relative to exhaust flow 500mm from tailpipe exit. (I probably won't use a tripod) Here's a photo, cause I read the instructions wrong myself.
    • No ABS, no TCS, no airbags, no cruise control, no lane departure assist, no emergency brake assist, no orange lights in the mirrors (continuously annoying me in multi-lane traffic), no stupid rear view camera. I am the one responsible for where my car goes and how it does it.
    • Cheapest Jaycar one is only $65.
×
×
  • Create New...