Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

It seems like there are 3 brands, being SKUNK2, Motordyne and BLOX.

Motordyne has various models for the spacers, being 1/2", 5/16" in Basic, ISO Thermo, ISO Copper. Unless you live in a cold area, buy the BASIC at about $200USD. I haven't seen a DYNO sheet for this one yet.

MotordyneBASICPlenum.jpg

As for SKUNK2, it's a plastic composite of some sort and is approx $200USD also. SKUNK has it's own DYNO sheet to show HP gains.

SKUNKPlenum.jpg

Motordynemrev2a.jpg

The cheapest is BLOX (about 1/2 price at $100USD). Given that it is also plastic composite, if you are on a budget, go for this one.

BLOXPlenum.jpg

To those who have bought, can you comment on:

1. Would you buy it again?

2. Was there noticeable difference after install?

As to a group buy, there is no need. Go search ebay.com USA and type in plenum spacer, and they all appear.

Furthermore to this, can anyone comment on the MOTORDYNE MREV2 LOWER COLLECTOR? At $450USD, is it a worthwhile 'gamble'?

Motordynemrev2.jpg

This post is inspired by Maximus007's Group Buy on the Motordyne Plenum Spacer (closed).

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/269659-vq35-plenum-spacers-for-v35g35350z/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Motordyne 5/16 basic here.

For me, i did feel a difference, in fact a massive difference for me (this will be different for everyone as to how in tune you are with your car, what you classify as a big/small difference and driving style)..

I feel power has improved impressively considering the cost, response *may* be a tad better. Feels better through whole rpm range but more noticeable from mid to cutout. Oh and yeah, i'd definitely buy it again.

As for the mrev2 lower collector, if you have the vq35de, probably skip the mrev2...from what everyone says, it gives very poor value for money in terms of performance increase. On the HR engines however, it works really well. The US enthusiasts generally use the guide of vq35de should install spacer, vq35hr should use mrev2+spacer.

Note: My car when stock had really low power output (i'm talking lower than 130 kw atw) so it is possible my mods are releasing the typical power + the power i should've had in the first place, hence the big difference feel for me.

As I think I've mentioned, I found the exhaust/z-tube/plenum spacer combo to make a huge difference in response and feel. Unfortunately I didn't have the opportunity to check each component individually, but you can't have it all.

Yeah exhaust/spacer/intake seems a pretty good combo for the vq35de :)

With these and a little more, my coupe can comfortably do sub 6 to 100km/h in acceleration. In gear acceleration is quite good too considering displacement and n/a nature of the car.

-Exhaust alone of course makes the car louder, the rev range will be nicer from mid mostly and you'll feel a bit at cutout (for a typical catback/y pipe back).

-Z tube makes not much difference by itself, engine was a bit louder when giving it. The revs may have climbed a *little little* bit quicker compared to oem tube.

-Dropping in a high flow panel filter gave the car a tiny bit more power, i noticed the revs climbing quicker with this than just the z tube.

-Spacer made an impressive difference to me. Engine was once again a little louder along with exhaust. Revs climbed a fair bit quicker and i can feel the difference from in gear acceleration as well. My fuel economy may have improved too but i'm not 100% on this.. maybe slightly.

I suspect if you already have the z tube and a filter/intake, the spacer makes full use of this along with the fact that it's preventing the front intake runners from being starved of air under high load. So perhaps spacer by itself isn't as good as say spacer+intake.

The above is my opinion only, you may get different results. All on an 03 coupe 6mt.

I've also had mildly improved fuel economy with the spacer/exhaust/z-tube combo. I was averaging under 7km/L (stop-start traffic every day), now it's on 7.6! At this rate I might make my investment back in 10 years or so :whistling:

Yeah exhaust/spacer/intake seems a pretty good combo for the vq35de :P

With these and a little more, my coupe can comfortably do sub 6 to 100km/h in acceleration. In gear acceleration is quite good too considering displacement and n/a nature of the car.

-Exhaust alone of course makes the car louder, the rev range will be nicer from mid mostly and you'll feel a bit at cutout (for a typical catback/y pipe back).

-Z tube makes not much difference by itself, engine was a bit louder when giving it. The revs may have climbed a *little little* bit quicker compared to oem tube.

-Dropping in a high flow panel filter gave the car a tiny bit more power, i noticed the revs climbing quicker with this than just the z tube.

-Spacer made an impressive difference to me. Engine was once again a little louder along with exhaust. Revs climbed a fair bit quicker and i can feel the difference from in gear acceleration as well. My fuel economy may have improved too but i'm not 100% on this.. maybe slightly.

I suspect if you already have the z tube and a filter/intake, the spacer makes full use of this along with the fact that it's preventing the front intake runners from being starved of air under high load. So perhaps spacer by itself isn't as good as say spacer+intake.

The above is my opinion only, you may get different results. All on an 03 coupe 6mt.

I have the 03 manual as well. I'm going tomorrow to get a dyno run and possible talk about a tune depending on price. I'm currently researching and in the market for a motordyne spacer 5/16" , k&n drop in filter and the z-tube.

There are so many z-tube stainless steel , CF , etc im not sure which one to buy , what do you think?

As for my mods i already have a fuji exhaust system, and some impul ecu that im not real happy about. I think it cuts out the revs higher like 7500rpm's but i believe no one can tune it or it cant be tuned. I will find out tomorrow.

Hey manda23,

Yep i would definitely recommend a combo like you've mentioned. It's all quite cheap and pretty good bang for buck if you're after a bit more power/acceleration. As above, i'm using the motordyne 5/16 basic and found it easy to install and to give solid gains. My Z tube is oem. And i'm running a trust/greddy airinx dropin panel filter.

For the z tube, i don't really recommend the steel ones as they heatsoak (especially on a hotday). Go with either the oem plastic z tube or a CF/silicone one imho. If you go with a CF one, make sure it's a good quality one, not a cheapie that will crack under usage lol =/

For the K&N filter, maybe try looking for a dry filter ? As during cleaning of the K&N, you have to reoil it and if done too much, oil will build up on your air flow meter making the car not run optimally (only happens when you apply too much oil...but why not just get a dry filter in the first place :) )

The stock cutout for the vq35de is 6600rpms and if yours is around 7500rpms, definitely some kind of ecu tweaking happening there. The impul ecu i don't think anyone in Aus will be able to tune. Also without knowing what internals you have, might be a good idea to keep the revs under 7200rpms. The stock internals start deforming past 7200rpms. A decent solution that i'm thinking of is the emanage ultimate. Enough functions for our cars plus it can adjust the rev limit and also disable 180km/h speed limit for track etc.

How'd you go on the dyno and the ECU thing ? :D

I have the 03 manual as well. I'm going tomorrow to get a dyno run and possible talk about a tune depending on price. I'm currently researching and in the market for a motordyne spacer 5/16" , k&n drop in filter and the z-tube.

There are so many z-tube stainless steel , CF , etc im not sure which one to buy , what do you think?

As for my mods i already have a fuji exhaust system, and some impul ecu that im not real happy about. I think it cuts out the revs higher like 7500rpm's but i believe no one can tune it or it cant be tuned. I will find out tomorrow.

How'd the popcharger do ? I've heard mixed reports but most good! Did they dyno with bonnet up or down ? If bonnet was up.. kinda gives the open pod an unfair advantage that wouldn't exist under road driving.

I've also had mildly improved fuel economy with the spacer/exhaust/z-tube combo. I was averaging under 7km/L (stop-start traffic every day), now it's on 7.6! At this rate I might make my investment back in 10 years or so :)
Hey manda23,

Yep i would definitely recommend a combo like you've mentioned. It's all quite cheap and pretty good bang for buck if you're after a bit more power/acceleration. As above, i'm using the motordyne 5/16 basic and found it easy to install and to give solid gains. My Z tube is oem. And i'm running a trust/greddy airinx dropin panel filter.

For the z tube, i don't really recommend the steel ones as they heatsoak (especially on a hotday). Go with either the oem plastic z tube or a CF/silicone one imho. If you go with a CF one, make sure it's a good quality one, not a cheapie that will crack under usage lol =/

For the K&N filter, maybe try looking for a dry filter ? As during cleaning of the K&N, you have to reoil it and if done too much, oil will build up on your air flow meter making the car not run optimally (only happens when you apply too much oil...but why not just get a dry filter in the first place :D )

The stock cutout for the vq35de is 6600rpms and if yours is around 7500rpms, definitely some kind of ecu tweaking happening there. The impul ecu i don't think anyone in Aus will be able to tune. Also without knowing what internals you have, might be a good idea to keep the revs under 7200rpms. The stock internals start deforming past 7200rpms. A decent solution that i'm thinking of is the emanage ultimate. Enough functions for our cars plus it can adjust the rev limit and also disable 180km/h speed limit for track etc.

How'd you go on the dyno and the ECU thing ? :)

I'm still waiting on dyno they are running an hour behind. And on thr phone I waS quoted nothing over $100 for a power run and when I got there the guy said $150. So if they trying to rip me il be going else where. From what I have read the cf z-tube from the z-store is of good quality so might go with that one. Why did u get the basic spacer and not the ISO ? As for the filter i have still heard good things about the k&n drop in so il get that one didnt kmow there was a wet and dry one so il get the dry one now i know , thanks .When I get back home il try to post up my results.

Ouch! $150 for a dyno run is excessive...it should be $88 (in sydney).

Most places equipped with a dyno dynamics usually charge $88. Not sure on dynapaks etc as they have more labour with the removal of wheels etc.

I don't think K&N do a dry filter, only wet. As they are supposed to last million miles or something, it has to be a wet type due to user servicing (cleaning every so often). For reference, my greddy panel was $50 and is a dry type, but doens't last a million miles lol.

I went with basic because i didn't really want the engine to cop anymore heat (the manifold kinda acts as a heatsink for the engine plus i have the enginer cover removed). The highish compression ratio and the design means the motor runs pretty hot and i've noticed on my car the cooler the engine is, the better it runs (much better.. most likely ECU advancing timing). BUT i was suffering from a heat issue with my car when i bought it stock. I'd daresay my car had problems that no one else does though so YMMV.

They are charging me $100 and he looked at the impul he said never seen it before but I'm going to get the power run anyway just to see the output and how it's running with the Aussie fuel . I did mention to him about the spacer and he said something about clearance under the bonnet .

They are charging me $100 and he looked at the impul he said never seen it before but I'm going to get the power run anyway just to see the output and how it's running with the Aussie fuel . I did mention to him about the spacer and he said something about clearance under the bonnet .

Just quickly here is the results . He said i should be happy and with the mods im looking at should add another 15-20kws, Is this result at the wheels or what ? Its my first time :D

post-55737-1242282723_thumb.jpg

Just quickly here is the results . He said i should be happy and with the mods im looking at should add another 15-20kws, Is this result at the wheels or what ? Its my first time :)

If you have a spacer then you should get 170kw at the wheels thats what i got.

read this

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Sk...20&start=20

You will have no issues with bonnet clearance with the motordyne 5/16" spacer. I haven't read of anyone that has. Maybe plastic engine cover clearance maybe (the plastic thing ontop of the manifold).

If you have a spacer then you should get 170kw at the wheels thats what i got.

read this

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Sk...20&start=20

Different dyno, different car, different conditions. Can't compare. Just like CRD's dyno reading 15-20kw atw difference compared to other dynos. UAS have a stingy low reading dyno etc etc.

Manda23,

Congrats, not a bad result.

I'm not sure about another 15-20kw atws though from the mods. I noticed you dyno'd at pulse and i've found the figures their dyno puts out to be not be bad (i.e average, not low or high reading) from my experience.

If you're thinking of getting it tuned there though, please PM me as i've got some info. I can't post it as it might look like i'm badmouthing or something.

If you have a spacer then you should get 170kw at the wheels thats what i got.

read this

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Sk...20&start=20

With the motordyne spacer k&n filter and the z-tube

I'm hoping for 180kw that would be great . A friend told me better off going with some cams for the money and would be looking around the 200kw area . What do you guys think ? How much are cams and what's the ones to get ?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
    • The detail level is about right for the money they charge for the full kit... AU$21.00 each issue, 110 issues for a total of $2,300 (I mentioned $2.2K in the first post when the exchange rate was better). $20/week is doable... 😐
    • If planning on joining us for the day(s) please indicate by filling in this form. https://forms.gle/Ma8Nn4DzYVA8uDHg7
    • You put the driver's seat on the wrong side! Incredible detail on all of this. It looks like you could learn a lot about the car just from assembling the kit.
×
×
  • Create New...