Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I just want peoples oppions on what turbo to run To give approx 400hp at the wheels. Prefer full boost around 2500---3000 to 4000 max. And keep boost through to 7-8000rpm. I know that it will take longer to spool up than what i have, but maybe a hybrid setup would compensate lowend, and provide for highend? Im also looking at a sequential setup, but, im just looking at all the options before i decide on which avenue i will fully look into.

Thanks.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/27301-turbo-to-produce-400hp-at-wheels/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 48
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I think you will be striggling to make 400hp at the wheels out of an RB20.

Not to say it cant be done, but considering you want full boost by 4000rpm, i say its not likely.

Its my opinion that the only way you are going to get the power is with good internals, some headwork, and say 1.5bar of boost on something like a 2835.

In all seriousness depending on what you have already done to your car it will cost around 20 grand.

Yeah, big ask for an RB20. Expect a fair bit of lag, I think 4000rpm might be a bit unlikely, probably closer to 4500+.

You have to consider that with making power out of a turbo - if you want alot at the top, it will cost you down low. The sooner a turbo spools, the more back pressure you will have at higher revs which in turn kills power through reversion of exhaust gasses, poorer cylinder scavenging and the resultant increase in detonation requiring less ignition timing.

The other problem you 'may' exrerience is if you drop the turbine housing down too small, the turbo will spool up too quick, producing a greater flow of air than the engine can use - this will cause compressor surge where the air reverts through the compressor and robs you of more power - also not good.

Bottom line, unless you are building a drag car with close ratio gear box (you will need to replace the rb20box as it will have died long before 400rwhp), you would be much better with something that comes on boost a bit earlier and gives a strong midrange and a reasonable top end. The HKS2835, AX53B70, T518Z or similar would be my choices. Good response and wont run out of puff too soon.

An RB30DET can get pretty close to 400rwhp with full boost on at around 3500rpm.

Sydneykid has had a RB30DET making 350rwhp with full boost on by around 3000rpm.

The old saying goes in this situation:

"There's no replacement for displacement" :burnout:

EDIT: Steve.. Didn't yours make full boost around 3000rpm?!? Or is that just when loading her up?

When I say full boost I am talking around 1bar.

Yeah, around 1 bar at 3000rpm. I have gone for a larger turbine housing, 0.87 up from 0.61 (sitting waiting to be fitted) so it will probably add around 500rpm to spool up but should give me better top end. I am also fitting cams and cam gear, but I believe it wont go too far as I am also dropping the compression to 8.6:1 which is pretty close to the RB20 CR.

what about all the srs that have huge turbos on them.. go for something like a t67 but it will require 1.5bar.. see how that goes.. also get cams, cam gears.. fmic, pump, injectors, regulator, exhaust, ecu.. get something like 4.1 or 4.3 diff gears.. keeps you on boost JUST incase.. cant think of anything else atm

The R32's already have a 4.363:1 Diff ratio.

Keep in mind that its harder for a short stroke RB20det to spool up a large turbo compared to a long stroke SR20 that blows a big long blow in to the turbo, the RB20 has little puffs in to the turbo.

Originally posted by rbs13

what about all the srs that have huge turbos on them.. go for something like a t67 but it will require 1.5bar.. see how that goes.. also get cams, cam gears.. fmic, pump, injectors, regulator, exhaust, ecu.. get something like 4.1 or 4.3 diff gears.. keeps you on boost JUST incase.. cant think of anything else atm

And how many of these make good boost (useable) under 4krpm?

Its all good if you want to do cams, manifold cam gears, port etc but it will still be battling to make it under 4k.

1.5bar on a t67? now where up to 5k+rpm.

Its all good if you dont mind winding the rev limit skyward, but I do believe the SRs are a bit better suited to this, I wouldnt like to take a stock RB20 much past 8k for too long or too often.

Hi guys, the short stroke and larger bore ratio of the RB20 makes it more likely to rev higher and easier than a square (same bore and stroke) SR20. Plus the RB20 direct acting (on the bucket) camshaft is a much better system than the spindly rockers on an SR20. The only possible advantage an SR20 has is more valve area per cylinder, due to the bigger bore diameter allowing larger valves. But 24 valves versus 16 may well make up the difference anyway.

I have never actually worked out the total valve area and compared them, a job for another day perhaps.

Hope that helps

yea, those were the reason i was going to state. i know getting 1.5 bar out of a rb with t67 would be a mighty 5k.. but it would rock!! anyway.. why does mtopxsecret6 want 400rwhp? braggin right? want good times? you could get better times with a smaller turbo/less power so think really hard about WHY you need 400rwhp

I wouldnt like to take a stock RB20 much past 8k for too long or too often.

I agree with not reving your car any harder then it need to. But RB20s only have 69.7mm stroke as well which also help them rev. If your engine has good cool supply of oil and coolant, then i dont think its too much a drama. How often are road cars at sustained full trottle high rpm load?

Good points sydneykid.

But I would really love to see a sr20 or rb20 spool up a turbo to useable boost before 4000rpm and will comfortably make 400rwhp - and a T67 is a pretty big turbo I would even more so love to see that particular turbo make useable boost under 4k on an Rb20 - or even an RB25 whilst still using a turbine housing that wouldnt choke it before 400rwhp.

Hi guys, the way I look at is, I need a car with good average power over a minimum 3,000 rpm power range. That allows for the drop in RPM after an upchange. With 1st to 2nd (as usual) being the biggest gap in a Skyline.

So if I have an RB20 with good average power from 3,000 rpm to 6,000 rpm or from 5,000 rpm to 8,000 rpm, it doesn't really matter. The problem comes from when you have an engine that makes a good average from 6,000 rpm to 8,000 rpm, then you have a real problem. It takes too long to regather itself after the gearchange and is therefore slower accelerating than its maximum power would indicate.

As I always say, it's all about the average not the max.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
    • Probably not. A workshop grade scantool is my go to for proper Consult interrogation. Any workshop grade tool should do it. Just go to a workshop.
    • In my head it does make sense to be a fuel problem since that is what I touched when cleaning the system. When I was testing with the fuel pressure gauge, the pressure was constantly 2.5 bar with the FPR vacuum removed. When stalling, the pressure was going up to 3.0 bar (which is how it should be on ignition).
    • ECUtalk pages don't mention they support the ABS computer (consult port has more than one CAN), so you might just need a different scan tool. But, I would expect ABS is a different light to the brake warning/handbrake light, do you see an ABS light come on for a few seconds when you turn the key from ACC to IGN? But since you said: I'd have a look at the ABS sensors in the rear hubs to make sure they are not damaged, disconnected etc.
    • OK, if it idles at 1000+ with the AAC, its not an idle airflow problem. The cold start valve just gives extra air when the engine is cold, but you have enough air without it to idle at 1000. I think you are back to a fuel problem, sorry. Can you see the fuel pressure staying constant or does it drop as the revs drop to a stall?  
×
×
  • Create New...