Jump to content
SAU Community

It`s V35... SKYLINE, V35...

Rezz

By Rezz,
in R Series (R30, R31, R32, R33, R34)

 Share

Recommended Posts

d0p3y Grand Master

d0p3y

Posted
Posted
the GTR version is called r35 cos their now considering the GTR a totally different car

the GTR isnt even out yet

the v35 is for the "skylines" that look ***** with a  v6

therefore

r35 GTR

v35 skyline

GTR....

*sigh.......*

aren't you dead yet? could you please hurry and like, end yourself?

MLCrisis Proficient

MLCrisis

Posted
Posted
And we all know how good the frogs are at car design...........long live the citreon, the renault, and the peuguot, with out a doubt the three ugliest looking cars ever made.

:bs!:

C'mon Trident, don't be so one-eyed. You might have missed the fact that Citreon, Peugeot and Renault are makes, with a whole range of cars and histories going back over 100 years each. Did you know Peugeot claim to have made the world's second car, in 1889, one year after Benz did the first? Obviously not. So you know how good the frogs are at car design?!! Dismissing them as "the three ugliest looking cars ever" just puts you in the same book as the "I hate the other lot", narrow minded Falcadore lovers. In case you missed it, the Peugeot 607 Coupe was voted by the World's motoring press as one of the most beautiful cars ever. Only seen a handful in Oz, but a marvelous car. Peugeot have been World Rally Champions loads of times and are still leaders in that sport. The Citreon DS series and the Renault 5, whilst idiosyncratic, were the most innovative cars of their day and used technology way ahead of the rest of the world. (If you have a 4x4 with self levelling air suspension, thank the designers of the Citreon DS, in the 1960s!!) Peugeots and Renaults are just about the only cars to buy in Africa -they are the only cars to stand up to African roads and conditions, because their construction is so rugged.

I am not a fan of the French or their cars, but I cannot stand people being dismissive in their attitudes. If you are supposed to be a car enthusiast, you should know more about them! Give credit where it is due. Otherwise, you just descend to the level of the one make, one eyed bigots, who allow the Australian motor manufacturers to continue to give us crap and then prevent us bringing in to this country what we actually want to drive!!

Just thought you might like to ponder that!

Cheers.

tridentt150v Grand Master

tridentt150v

Posted
Posted
:bs!:  

C'mon Trident, don't be so one-eyed.  You might have missed the fact that Citreon, Peugeot and Renault are makes, with a whole range of cars and histories going back over 100 years each.  Did you know Peugeot claim to have made the world's second car, in 1889, one year after Benz did the first?

Being first doesn't mean its good...............

 Obviously not.  So you know how good the frogs are at car design?!!  Dismissing them as "the three ugliest looking cars ever" just puts you in the same book as the "I hate the other lot", narrow minded Falcadore lovers.  

I didn't say that, I quite like some other automobiles, I actually like the look of my Skyline, I also happen to like the look of Supra's, Monaro's, De Tomasa's, Lotus's, GTHO's, Corvette's, '68 Mustangs, Transam's, Ferrari's, etc etc etc

.........

In case you missed it, the Peugeot 607 Coupe was voted by the World's motoring press as one of the most beautiful cars ever.  Only seen a handful in Oz, but a marvelous car.

Big wank, they hand out credos to a lot of cars, some [such as the Austin Marina] won many awards, didn't help them, they faded into a long forgotten history.........

 Peugeot have been World Rally Champions loads of times and are still leaders in that sport.

As are the Evo, the WRX, and the Corolla, but they don't own Nissan, so are not mentioned........................

 The Citreon DS series and the Renault 5, whilst idiosyncratic, were the most innovative cars of their day and used technology way ahead of the rest of the world.  (If you have a 4x4 with self levelling air suspension, thank the designers of the Citreon DS, in the 1960s!!)

You want innovation, try anything from just about any manufacturer, Cadillac, Jaguar, Lincoln, Ferrari, etc etc etc

 Peugeots and Renaults are just about the only cars to buy in Africa -they are the only cars to stand up to African roads and conditions, because their construction is so rugged.

Ya gotta be kiddin' me, remember apartheid, the french were one of the few nations that ignored it [unofficially]. Anyway, all I've ever seen in Africa was Landrovers, and they are a whole new novel...................................

I am not a fan of the French or their cars, but I cannot stand people being dismissive in their attitudes.  If you are supposed to be a car enthusiast, you should know more about them!  Give credit where it is due.  Otherwise, you just descend to the level of the one make, one eyed bigots, who allow the Australian motor manufacturers to continue to give us crap and then prevent us bringing in to this country what we actually want to drive!!

I'm fine with that, I don't want to drive any Citreon, Peugeot, or Renault, never, ever, period..................................  

Just thought you might like to ponder that!

The V35 still looks like a recycled Citreon, I have res-ponder-d [apologies for the spelling.]

Cheers.

tridentt150v Grand Master

tridentt150v

Posted
Posted
:bs!:  

C'mon Trident, don't be so one-eyed.  You might have missed the fact that Citreon, Peugeot and Renault are makes, with a whole range of cars and histories going back over 100 years each.  Did you know Peugeot claim to have made the world's second car, in 1889, one year after Benz did the first?

Being first doesn't mean its good...............

 Obviously not.  So you know how good the frogs are at car design?!!  Dismissing them as "the three ugliest looking cars ever" just puts you in the same book as the "I hate the other lot", narrow minded Falcadore lovers.  

I didn't say that, I quite like some other automobiles, I actually like the look of my Skyline, I also happen to like the look of Supra's, Monaro's, De Tomasa's, Lotus's, GTHO's, Corvette's, '68 Mustangs, Transam's, Ferrari's, etc etc etc

.........

In case you missed it, the Peugeot 607 Coupe was voted by the World's motoring press as one of the most beautiful cars ever.  Only seen a handful in Oz, but a marvelous car.

Big wank, they hand out credos to a lot of cars, some [such as the Austin Marina] won many awards, didn't help them, they faded into a long forgotten history.........

 Peugeot have been World Rally Champions loads of times and are still leaders in that sport.

As are the Evo, the WRX, and the Corolla, but they don't own Nissan, so are not mentioned........................

 The Citreon DS series and the Renault 5, whilst idiosyncratic, were the most innovative cars of their day and used technology way ahead of the rest of the world.  (If you have a 4x4 with self levelling air suspension, thank the designers of the Citreon DS, in the 1960s!!)

You want innovation, try anything from just about any manufacturer, Cadillac, Jaguar, Lincoln, Ferrari, etc etc etc

 Peugeots and Renaults are just about the only cars to buy in Africa -they are the only cars to stand up to African roads and conditions, because their construction is so rugged.

Ya gotta be kiddin' me, remember apartheid, the french were one of the few nations that ignored it [unofficially]. Anyway, all I've ever seen in Africa was Landrovers, and they are a whole new novel...................................

I am not a fan of the French or their cars, but I cannot stand people being dismissive in their attitudes.  If you are supposed to be a car enthusiast, you should know more about them!  Give credit where it is due.  Otherwise, you just descend to the level of the one make, one eyed bigots, who allow the Australian motor manufacturers to continue to give us crap and then prevent us bringing in to this country what we actually want to drive!!

I'm fine with that, I don't want to drive any Citreon, Peugeot, or Renault, never, ever, period..................................  

Just thought you might like to ponder that!

The V35 still looks like a recycled Citreon, I have res-ponder-d [apologies for the spelling.]

Cheers.

  • 6 years later...
Cicilia Newbie

Cicilia

Posted
Posted
unless they put a 5ltr, push rod, 2 valve per cylinder donk in the new skyline you'll never seen it run against the likes of v8 supercars, who cares anyway, already beat them at that game a few times, do you really need to embaress them again, they will just make a new formatt up again and rule the nissan out. thing i can't get my had around is they don't even run the V8's they sell there cars with!!!!!!

Personally I'm not sold on the new shape, looks like a maxima!

Hi I just got my hand on the v35 maxima look alike I am with you I don't go for the look at all But the rest of the car is sweet

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Kapr
      RB20DE NEO smallbox clutch.

      By Kapr · Posted

      For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • GTSBoy
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • Kinkstaah
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • GTSBoy
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • Kinkstaah
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...