Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

the v35 are designed to have a staggered wheel setup. You can put the same tyres front and back at least 245/40/18 (i think, correct me if i'm wrong please) in order to get the closest Speedo reading. If you decided not to go to the stock spec it'll put your Speedo reading off by alot of margins.

the stock for 17" tyres on V35 is 225/50 17 and 235/50 17.

  • Replies 81
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

it's 225/45 18 and 245/45/18

I'm not sure what are you talking about being the front sitting little lower.

if you referring the 225 that's not the thickness of the tyres it's the width of the tyres. 50 is the thickness of the tyres.

hmm i have 20inch 255/35 on rear, and 225/45 on front...guess the 20inch would really through out the speedo.....

The tyre shop that fitted 225/45 on your 20s should be shot. do a search and look for a tyre calculator.

why does front and rear tire size for V35 coupe is different

For more rear end grip.

( is it stock standard)

Yes.

is it ok if I have 225/45/18 front and back ? ?

Your speedo will over-read more than it does already.

Your ABS may (but probably won't) trigger prematurely.

Your VDC may trigger prematurely.

is it for the purpose of aerodynamic that front is sitting little lower than rear?

Possibly, but probably not. The undertrays will have more of an effect on aerodynamics than the slightly raked profile.

Also, what's to say that the rest of the suspension isn't configured expecting the front tyre to have a smaller diameter than the rear, and is relatively higher on the body to compensate?

if you referring the 225 that's not the thickness of the tyres it's the width of the tyres. 50 is the thickness of the tyres.

The front tyre has a slightly smaller diameter than the rear, so assuming that the rest of the suspension mounts are the same the front would arguably sit lower. However, to keep the chassis level I find it unlikely that Nissan would have done that.

hmm i have 20inch 255/35 on rear, and 225/45 on front...guess the 20inch would really through out the speedo.....

Your speedo isn't that inaccurate. With your profile drop and relatively narrow width, your speedo only under-reads by 1.3% compared to stock (which over-reads a bit anyway).

The tyre shop that fitted 225/45 on your 20s should be shot. do a search and look for a tyre calculator.

f**k yeah. That width and profile is stock on an 18" rim - its way too high for a 20.

wow... what a heap to re-read and take in.

Just a couple of things that I didn't really see clearly stated;

Can everyone pls also remember the rolling diameter for one brand tyre in ANY size may differ from the same size in another brand.

The below information was posted and there was lots of good tyre calculators linked, however I just want to re-iterate it...

Tyre sizes work in this way 245/45/18 = Profile is 45% of the 245mm width/rim size is 18 inch/width is 245mm.

I always work out the specifics of the rolling diameter using the actual tyre size AND the Manufacturer Rolling Diameter info.

  • 2 weeks later...
what if I have stock 17" stock rims on and I changed to stock 18" rims. would the speedo overread?

Your speedo will not be out just because you go to bigger rims. What you need to make sure is you have the correct profile tires when moving to bigger wheels to keep the overall diameter same/similar. Thats what the tire calculator is for. Do a search.

OMG I NEED HELP.

I just got my V35 and drvoveinto driveway. I found out the mid-bottom scrape the driveway...

it is pain everytime goin in and out.

the driveway is like a dip. has a crest in the middle and thats where the scraping occur.

can I change the size of the tires(thickness ) so that i can rise the car i little. i think i need half inch only.

what would be a good size if i do it?

current on stock 18" , tires 225/45/18 front and back

Edited by tonich

To raise your car using tyre profiles alone by 1/2 an inch is going to be a HUGE change in rolling diameter. Extra sidewall height will make handling fairly wooly. Plus the fact your car will end up looking like a 4WD. Sunraysias anyone?

Time to move house ;) .

Can you approach the crest at an angle? That will normally help a bit.

I had the same problem as I have quite a steep driveway going down to the garage from the street. I nailed two planks of wood to the driveway to give me some more clearance and problem solved . Don't know if this would work in your situation.

Edited by Easy Tiger

cant do it at an angle, the the driveway is too narrow.

I will try the planks of wood. but I have to place the wood everytime go in and out. gonna to real hassle

I am not sure about 19" stock rims with stock tires. does it increase clearance compare to stock 18". i might be able to get a set

Edited by tonich

please confirm with me on this:

i have used calculator to compare current set up 225/45/18 to new tires 245/45/18.

the diameter of wheel increased from 26 in to 26.7 inch. does it means it will increase my clearance by 0.7inch/ 1.8cm?

if so what brand of tires should i get

or can i rise the height with this coilover.

link'

thanks for help

Edited by tonich

You are stuck between a rock and a hard driveway. There is nothing much you can do to the car without altering its handling characteristics or making it look stupid. Increasing tire profile to suit is not recommended. If you are currently on lowered springs, then I guess reverting back to stock suspension is one way to do it. Other than that, you will need to find a way to modify your driveway as recommended above.

I came across a similar driveway when house hunting a few months back, neither of my V's could get into it without scraping the bottom. Needless to say I passed.

Perhaps post a pic of the said driveway as well..and also do you own or rent this place?

You are stuck between a rock and a hard driveway. There is nothing much you can do to the car without altering its handling characteristics or making it look stupid. Increasing tire profile to suit is not recommended. If you are currently on lowered springs, then I guess reverting back to stock suspension is one way to do it. Other than that, you will need to find a way to modify your driveway as recommended above.

I came across a similar driveway when house hunting a few months back, neither of my V's could get into it without scraping the bottom. Needless to say I passed.

Perhaps post a pic of the said driveway as well..and also do you own or rent this place?

i own a unit and i guess i shouldn't a car this size living in a unit. i now hunting for a garage near my place....

any suggestion on increasing the height with coilover? i dont mind if it looks stupid

Yes, You can go. I have coilovers sitting too low, I found the same problem with my driveway. So I increase it by 1 inch. no problem after. LOL, do looks not as good as it used to be, but as long as it do not strape my chasis.

Cheers

Yes, You can go. I have coilovers sitting too low, I found the same problem with my driveway. So I increase it by 1 inch. no problem after. LOL, do looks not as good as it used to be, but as long as it do not strape my chasis.

Cheers

any pictures my friend? how much it cost and brand?

any pictures my friend? how much it cost and brand?

Sorry mate, no pic so far, I was on work.

Brand is BC racing, F 8kg R 6kg, I set it to the softest. not to much different with factory on comfort but do corner a bit better.

Price is not bad. Send me PM for details. I don't want put here as not sure whether it is proper.

Frank

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • This is for an RB20DET. Sorry for not including that. 
    • Welp, this is where my compression lands after my rebuild. Thoughts? I have ~6 hours on the motor. 
    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
×
×
  • Create New...