Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

well Ive just had my manual conversion done and everything seems fine except for the gearbox making a whining/rubbing noise.

It makes the noise through 1st 2nd and 3rd gear but is ok in 4th and 5th. If the car is at idle it makes the noise but goes away when I push my clutch in.

I'm new to manual gearboxes so I Dont know much at all, so any help or info would be appreciated.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/278501-rb25-gearbox-noises/
Share on other sites

Gearbox bearings for sure. Not a thrust bearing, as the sound goes away when the clutch pedal is pressed...disconnecting movement from the gearbox and leaving it the logical source of the problem.

Unless you've bought a gearbox with some straight cut gears, you've acquired a dud gearbox. Will need a recondition and probably cost you $1000 for the privelege. Sorry to be the bearer of bad news.

i have the exact same problem mine being main shaft and input shaft bearing are shot, i have play between the shafts, and will grind 5th 2nd and 4th. this happened to my car when i bought it thanks the previous owner not having enough oil inside. i replaced the gearbox oil with a fully synthetic oil and my box has lasted a over a year and is still going, the 33 box is a very strong unit in that year i covered 30k worth of highway, city driving, through the mountains, and plain straight out abuse by abuse i mean shifting from first to second to third as hard and and as quick as i could, and about a dozen burnouts to destroy worn tires after a full days worth of abuse.

if i was you keep the box till it blows by then have some cash saved up and build it tough so then you can forget about it, in the end its up to your but if you pull the box apart not to replace the bearings, you might as well replace the 10+ year old syncros (how ever you spell it) and then one or two of the gears might been worth so replace them two. get the idea if your going to pull anything apart to fix do it properly and it will save you in the long run, bty way im talking from experience and i hope this long post gives you an idea as to what to do.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...