Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I always run on Premium (Optimax).

It's always a good idea to also keep a bottle of that Pro Strength Octane Booster in the boot, in case you need to fill up with regular and there is no premium around.

Just saves running the risk of ping when you kick it in the guts.

Lol, thanks a lot for the replies... Not sure if it says it on my profile but I live in Canberra, and if this wasn't mentioned earlier i'm looking to buy a GTS not a turbo cause the turbo will cost me around $800 a year more to insure... not good! Anyways, i don't get this car till the 25h November NEXT YEAR ;) but as they say, good things come to those who wait, so i'm waiting... ;)

whoa, you guys not living in canberra get cheap petrol! paid 106.9 for optimax the other day. p1r4t8r, BP Ultimate is cheaper than optimax, but you can only get it at kingston and phillip. I also think that you'll find that an extra $800 a year is not a lot to pay for Booost. (just over $2 a day- cut out a few ciggies or a can of coke or something!!!)

I have found that by running BP Ultimate or Shell Optimax in any of the cars that we have had over the last few years that the actual cost per km is lower.

I get at least 10% better distance from a tankful and it costs between 5 and 10% more.

Simple maths really.

Oh, and the car runs much better.

Even the Excel I had last year as a work hack got fed 98.

Excell gets fed 98ron??? thats excessive.

I reckon, as ppl have said, if u cant afford the good stuff u cant afford the car. Skyline is a performance machine, u dont see champion athletes eating at maccas and kfc now do ya..... well maybe cricket players.

I always run on BP ultimate98 and nothing else. That way if something goes wrong u know that the fuel is a constant so it cant be that. Then u start looking for other problems. :P

Ultimate98 does actually go further plus it is better for the environment (yes i still have my cat)

Originally posted by timbar32

p1r4t8r, BP Ultimate is cheaper than optimax, but you can only get it at kingston and phillip. I also think that you'll find that an extra $800 a year is not a lot to pay for Booost. (just over $2 a day- cut out a few ciggies or a can of coke or something!!!)

Cool! A fellow Canberran! Pleased to meet you!

I live in Conder... Kingston and Phillip are pretty far away from here if i just want petrol :P What about Chisholm BP, do they have it?

As for a turbo, i personally would like one, but $800 a year makes a big difference when you're only on a K-Mart salary (im hoping to get a cadetship with a gov. department, but the first year you only get paid $16k so supporting a car on that AND having a social life will be tough going.)

And besides all that, i don't actually smoke, and don't ever really buy food. About 90% of my income at the moment goes straight into my account for the Skyline...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...