Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

As thread title suggests im wondering on the different engines in the s1 stags.... Mines a a '97 RS4 V (well call this car A) A mates (stagharts) has a '98 RS4V Dayz (car B) Both are series ones. Im aware that his is a later model than mine and would have been produced just before the s2's were starting to get pumped out...

Now today after doing some work on his car I've noticed a few things, His CAS is different to mine and he has a nipple on his plenum that I dont have. Is their such thing as a Series 1 RB25DET and a Series 2 RB25DET? If so what are the differences?

When i upped the boost on mine to 12psi with no computer or piggbacks it didnt rich and retard or miss at all. However stagharts car doesnt want to get much over 10psi and feels to be missing or R & Ring at full throttle and full boost. His coils are in OK condition with some evidence of them leaking spark. Will try my splitfires in their soon to see if it removes the jolting/miss feeling on WOT.

Picks of each part im talking about can be found here : http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Se...Va-t281219.html

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/281266-sereis-1-stagea-engine-variants/
Share on other sites

its likely to follow the same suit as R33 GTST engine models, there are 3 known variants

series 1 = RB25det came in 1993 to 1995 GTST

series 2 = rb25det came in 1997 ish onwards

series 2.1 or series 3 or something else = came in 1998 R33 GTST

series 2.1 or series 3 or something else is RB25DET with ER34 CAS and some slight ER34 parts, but still R33 RB25DET

series 1 will have green or blue label AFM

series 2 will have pink label AFM

yep as per your pics

car a is series 1 rb25det

car b is series 2.1 or series 3 rb25det

theres 2 tenths of bugger all difference between them

the ECU differences are negligable and not even worth worrying about

the fact your doesnt hit R&R its pure luck, it might be a mangled/remapped/hacked ECU (likely)

the ECU differences are negligable and not even worth worrying about

the fact your doesnt hit R&R its pure luck, it might be a mangled/remapped/hacked ECU (likely)

So you think my car (car a) that doesnt hit the r & r has a hacked ecu?

theres a listed differences thread somewhere

the ECU differeces are bugger all, not even worth finding out what they are

the stock ecu is junk, dont even bother trying, remap, standalone or piggyback it

all stock ecu's r&R when airflow exceed's set levels

its not a fixed setting on boost, its based on airflow

it usually happens when you run around 10-12psi however

thats interesting... Mine never r & r as hard if any when i upped my bost.... And it was a stocker when i got it.....? Would supprise me if the ecu has been hacked to remove the r & r. Im now running a SITC and SAFCII anyway :) Just trying to sort out why his is r & r ing more... Might throw the timing light on his car and check the base timing for shits....

noooo paul....not for stageas. there are at least 3 ECUs in w34 series 1 stagea and they are very different in mapping / sensitivity to extra boost. And they all have different wiring looms. All use the S2 R33 GTST style motor with ignitors on the coil packs. Series 2 W34 is different again and may be the same as r34 gtt (not 100% sure though)

have a look for my thread re this in the stagea section.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...