Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

They have no dust covers that I can see and they have no grease points. They look to have rudimentary plastic scraper which won't last one trip into a sand trap. In a decent sphercial bearing there is more than $US15 worth of steel, so I seriously doubt the quality claim as well.

Harsh? Maybe.....no not realy.

Cheers

Gary

http://www.splparts.com/main4/index.htm

They use QA1 Endura 2000 on all their assy's, which I assumed are good quality, Is this not the case? In fact all the materials they use "appear" to be good quality. (see link)

I guess it wouldn't be hard to add dust covers for that added protection but there seems to be some pro's & cons to that idea too!!!!

I questioned him about longevity + replacing bearings and he said he could do them for the cost stated when the time came, It could be user discount or they may be genuinly cheaper in the USA than here.

You are looking at it in reverse. The ADR's primary requirement is that every single part of the vehicle be as designed by and delivered from the manufacturer. You can't change anything unless there is a specific regulation allowing you to. Simply put, there is no ADR allowing you to change suspension arms, so they must be standard.

There is specific allowance for changing things, usually termed wear and tear items, such as brake pads, wiper blades, tyres, brake rotors, shock absorbers, globes etc. Included in that grouping are suspension bushes, which is why it is not an infringment of an ADR to replace non adjustable rubber bushes with adjustable polyurethane ones as long as the suspension arms themselves remain as standard

Ah right. So basically as stated before, no aftermarket replacement arms/rods are going to be street legal, even if they are better engineered!!!!!!

So how do guys on here get past vehicle inspection or even get insurance for a road registered vehicle??!!!

Moreso, why do Suspension shops even offer the parts when they know they are not legal to start with??!!!!

What about coilovers, are they technically illegal too?. I've got some Ohlins on the way :(

Edited by mosoto
  • Replies 79
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

http://www.splparts.com/main4/index.htm

They use QA1 Endura 2000 on all their assy's, which I assumed are good quality, Is this not the case? In fact all the materials they use "appear" to be good quality. (see link)

I guess it wouldn't be hard to add dust covers for that added protection but there seems to be some pro's & cons to that idea too!!!!

I questioned him about longevity + replacing bearings and he said he could do them for the cost stated when the time came, It could be user discount or they may be genuinly cheaper in the USA than here.

I buy 100's of QA1's spherical bearings per year direct from the USA, so I have a pretty good idea what $US15 buys.

I also travel to the US every 2 or 3 years to the major car shows, especially SEMA, so I see the latest and greatest products first hand.

Over the years I have used 1000‘s of spherical bearings in race cars, so I have nothing against them. Only that they be used in the appropriate application and a road car is not an appropriate application, especially considering our local roads and conditions.

Ah right. So basically as stated before, no aftermarket replacement arms/rods are going to be street legal, even if they are better engineered!!!!!!

The fact is they aren't "better engineered", they haven't undergone the rigorous testing that a car manufacturuer applies and they aren't covered by the same warranties and conditions.

So how do guys on here get past vehicle inspection or even get insurance for a road registered vehicle??!!!

Normal rego inspection often doesn't include checking suspension arms, when it does they fail.

Moreso, why do Suspension shops even offer the parts when they know they are not legal to start with??!!!!

Decent suspension workshops don't. Based on my experience 99.9% of aftermarket suspension arms are sold by counter jockeys in parts importers who have no idea about suspension or they are bought off an internet reseller, Ebay etc.

What about coilovers, are they technically illegal too?. I've got some Yamahas (corrected for accuracy) on the way :P

If they are externally adjustable for height, then yes they are specifically illegal in each state as well as being ADR illegal for Australia.

Cheers

Gary

What about coilovers, are they technically illegal too?. I've got some Ohlins made by Carrozzeria on the way :P

If they are externally adjustable for height, then yes they are specifically illegal in each state as well as being ADR illegal for Australia.

Yes Yamaha are affiliated with Ohlins Europe, but I believe the DFV I've ordered are made in Japan, Correct me if i'm wrong!!

So seriously though, can we not use the NCOP11 rulings to have suspension modifications certified by an engineer and therefore street legal?

The DFV Coilovers I've ordered are specifically for the V35 (OEM rear suspension config) and are height adjustable without effecting spring length,

Surely this has got to be a better option than lowering springs and shortened shocks as it retains full suspension travel, within the limits of clearances of course!!!

What I've read about the V35 is camber from even a 1" drop can not always be corrected with the stock suspension, so I don't want to prematurely wear out my Yokohama V103 or have the car looking like a VW just because I want to lower the C of G :(.

So all in all, how do we "improve" handling, response & feedback for the track with a stock suspension AND keep the car street legal to drive daily?

Signed

Des Pondent.

Edited by mosoto
Yes Yamaha are affiliated with Ohlins Europe, but I believe the DFV I've ordered are made in Japan, Correct me if i'm wrong!!

Not quite, some years ago Yamaha bought Ohlins (a Swedish company BTW) for their motorcycle racing shock absorber technology. We use real Ohlins what we call "Swedish Ohlins" in the V8 SuperCars and cars in a number of other race categories, have been for a number of years. They are mid race shock price range at $4-5K per corner but very effective, wider operating window than Penskes and cheaper than Sach/Boges, so good value for money. Not quite as good in the value for money stakes as MCA's (nee Proflex) at $2-3K per corner.

Since the acquisition Yamaha have been using the Ohlins name on the high end shocks made in the Yamaha factory in Japan, what we call "Japanese Ohlins". They are in no way comparable to the Swedish Ohlins, no parts are interchangeable, the valving system and piston are a completely different design. The Australian Ohlins agent would never touch touch "Japanaese Ohlins", wouldn't service them and didn't carry any spare parts.

Don't get me wrong, there are far worse shocks around, sure they are not technically brilliant, but that's not the problem. The real issue is they are 100% designed for Japanese roads and Japanese buyer expectations. They are excessively harsh, their high frequency valving is not suited to our course gravel road base and they often come with spring rates that are beyond what we use in race cars.

So seriously though, can we not use the NCOP11 rulings to have suspension modifications certified by an engineer and therefore street legal?

You can have pretty much anything certified, all you need is money. Each car has to be engineered itself and I would estimate $800 to $1500 per suspension arm for testing and then sign off. That would still leave the issues of dust prevention and greasing.

The DFV Coilovers I've ordered are specifically for the V35 (OEM rear suspension config) and are height adjustable without effecting spring length,

That's pretty tricky since the V35 doesn't have coil overs in the rear, the springs are a separate mounting from the shocks.

Surely this has got to be a better option than lowering springs and shortened shocks as it retains full suspension travel, within the limits of clearances of course!!!

That's not the problem, the issue is you can change the height anytime you like, that's what is illegal. Think about it, you get defected for too low, go home, wind up the height, get the defect lifted, go home and lower it back again. The record as far as I know it is 8 times, for one guy in NSW. That's why it's specifically illegal, nothing to do with quality.

What I've read about the V35 is camber from even a 1" drop can not always be corrected with the stock suspension, so I don't want to prematurely wear out my Yokohama V103 or have the car looking like a VW just because I want to lower the C of G :).

But what about the roll centre? What are doing about that? Lowering a V35 30 mm lowers the roll centre 43 mm, hence increases the roll couple by 13 mm. So you actually get more roll after you lower it.

So all in all, how do we "improve" handling, response & feedback for the track with a stock suspension AND keep the car street legal to drive daily?

Do it properly. First thing is upgraded swaybars, the undisputed best value for money suspension upgrade there is. They are 100% legal. Next is changing the static alignment, they need more caster and front tow out for a starter. That's 100% legal. Then swap out the soft rubber bushes with polyurethane to maintain the dynamic geometry. Yep that's 100% legal too. The standard spring rates are not too bad, if you'd like to retain the current level of ride comfort. Then a set of Bilstein shocks, they will improve the handling another step, control the additional anti roll rate from the upgraded swaybars without diminishing the ride comfort unduly. Also 100% legal. Why Bilsteins? Well Nissan have used Bilstein as a partner many of their high end applications for many years, and they did choose them for the R35GTR and then went back to Bilstein again for the R35GTR V Spec dampers. Maybe they know just a little about Nissan suspension systems and world wide conditions.

Not very glamorous though is it, not a lot of shiny stuff to show your mates, or a trendy low ride height to look at. Just good handling, some semblance of ride comfort and no defect opportunity. From there it depends on how serious you are about the track work. For example, if you are going to swap to R type tyres for the track days then an increase in spring rate maybe justified. But every step in that direction takes it further away from comfortable daily driving.

Cheers

Gary

Thanks Gary.

I've done a fair bit of research on my choices and I'm led to believe the Japanese DFV Ohlins are not the harsh ride expected from most Jap units. I chose them because they are regarded as an excellent unit for street & track and a much better choice than say Tein, HKS, Cusco & Bilstein. The US has some pretty harsh road surfaces and the Ohlins are considered a good choice there, so surely they can't be so mismatched to our surfaces. This was the start but not the end of my search here:

http://g35driver.com/forums/brakes-suspens...-w-updates.html

The spring rates like any good quality unit, match the damper and from what I can accertain, are better than stock ride comfort on soft settings. The valving is apparently much better and more accurate than the Bilstein PSS9/10 which was another choice that has the OEM rear setup (separate shock & spring). As I said, made specifically for the V35/350Z OEM rear so maybe not so tricky :(

Then again, If your info/advice is based on 1st hand experience with the DFV then all the research in the world is moot.

I could have gone Koni/Eibach but I was told the ride will be more harsh than stock (for daily) so moved away from that idea.

I'm only looking at approx 1" drop, maybe a little more on the front. Not looking at "adjusting" height any more than that and getting a yellow, I'm 43, My back can't handle a sled daily :)

I didn't want them for bling or constant height change, just to acheive quality ride at a set ride height.

With roll centre I found these? http://www.z1auto.com/prodmore.asp?model=3...amp;prodid=3417

I've got Hotchkis sways ordered too, apparently the best mod for the V35/G35 is stiffer sways so at least I'm on the right track there (no pun intended)!!!!

The spare 18's I've got will get race rubber, I don't intend to run my street tyres/rims on the track as they're 20".

So as you can see, I want the best of both worlds. If it can not be acheived then I will have to accept that and not track the car.

Edited by mosoto

My apologies to the OP, I've taken this a little OT.

Mods feel free to move my discussion with Gary (Sydneykid) to "Aftermarket suspension mods" in the V35 section if you deem it necessary.

BTW, raised my car, handles heaps better, will be going with the Whilteine/Noltec adjustable bushes once I sell the stagea.(few unexpected costs have come up lately, including a trip to NZ, so no more mods til I sell the spare car.)

  • 2 weeks later...
They have no dust covers that I can see and they have no grease points. They look to have rudimentary plastic scraper which won't last one trip into a sand trap. In a decent sphercial bearing there is more than $US15 worth of steel, so I seriously doubt the quality claim as well.

Harsh? Maybe.....no not realy.

Cheers

Gary

Grease rod ends are BAD. They are fine industrial rod ends only. You never use them on a car unless they have OEM style boots (which they never do in a Spherical bearing)

The ones SPL use are the ones I linked earlier. They are a QA1 Xm or endura rod end. They have been proven to get 3 years out of them in a street S13

They are a nylon lined bearings. Teflon punches out (or chunks out) But teflon is still popular.

These are fine to be used in dirt applications Gary.

The idea with rod ends is the tolerence between the liner and the race is so tight, that dirt molecules cant get inside the liner, so it cant wear. Almost all off road buggys DO NOT use dust boots.

vance-header.gif

92300_fw02.jpg

Videos are here

http://images.google.com.au/imgres?imgurl=...sa%3DG%26um%3D1

Thanks Gary.

I've done a fair bit of research on my choices and I'm led to believe the Japanese DFV Ohlins are not the harsh ride expected from most Jap units. I chose them because they are regarded as an excellent unit for street & track and a much better choice than say Tein, HKS, Cusco & Bilstein. The US has some pretty harsh road surfaces and the Ohlins are considered a good choice there, so surely they can't be so mismatched to our surfaces. This was the start but not the end of my search here:

http://g35driver.com/forums/brakes-suspens...-w-updates.html

The spring rates like any good quality unit, match the damper and from what I can accertain, are better than stock ride comfort on soft settings. The valving is apparently much better and more accurate than the Bilstein PSS9/10 which was another choice that has the OEM rear setup (separate shock & spring). As I said, made specifically for the V35/350Z OEM rear so maybe not so tricky :)

Then again, If your info/advice is based on 1st hand experience with the DFV then all the research in the world is moot.

I could have gone Koni/Eibach but I was told the ride will be more harsh than stock (for daily) so moved away from that idea.

I'm only looking at approx 1" drop, maybe a little more on the front. Not looking at "adjusting" height any more than that and getting a yellow, I'm 43, My back can't handle a sled daily ;)

I didn't want them for bling or constant height change, just to acheive quality ride at a set ride height.

With roll centre I found these? http://www.z1auto.com/prodmore.asp?model=3...amp;prodid=3417

I've got Hotchkis sways ordered too, apparently the best mod for the V35/G35 is stiffer sways so at least I'm on the right track there (no pun intended)!!!!

The spare 18's I've got will get race rubber, I don't intend to run my street tyres/rims on the track as they're 20".

So as you can see, I want the best of both worlds. If it can not be acheived then I will have to accept that and not track the car.

Just letting you know, they are the FAKE kind of RCAs.

They move the arm down but not the pivot point. You need to use a longer shaft to move the pivot down, or you arent actually doing anything.

There are milliions of threads around the world on this, and there are a few on Moonface ones, and customers getting ripped off

Is there any harm in covering the Rose joints with a lot grease so that dirt/moisture will get trap on the surface of the grease and wont' go into the joint?

Yeah thats it, grease is the problem, as it attracts dirt to the joint, which is bad.

As with everything though, there are always 2 or 3 schools of thought

Well how is it bad if it only stay on the surface of the grease, outside the joint?

It may looks bad but is it really bad?

Most joints that Ive seen has a layer of teflon on the outside lip of the joint, which reduces the larger dust particles from getting into the joint. Sure there will be small size dirt that will get through into the joint with the grease, but without the grease there will be a lot more dirt of this size into the joint.

I like to think of an analogy of mucus in our human nasal cavity which attracts the dust but reduce the amount of dust getting into the lungs...or is it not the same?

It's actually the nasal hairs that prevent dust particles from passing not mucus, only dogs are supposed to have constantly wet noses :(

OT grease WILL atract dirt purely by it's nature and hold it there, where a rose joint without grease will shed the dirt.

It's actually the nasal hairs that prevent dust particles from passing not mucus, only dogs are supposed to have constantly wet noses :(

OT grease WILL atract dirt purely by it's nature and hold it there, where a rose joint without grease will shed the dirt.

lol nice to be corrected but that was only an analogy mate.

If you get exposed to dust all the time, your nasal system will start to secrete mucus :P

I can guarantee you that you won't grow more hair :P

The way fine inspirable particles or dust ( <145 um) are filtered by the nasal system is a bit more complicated than just that. It's a combination of filtration, static adhesion, particle momentum etc. Nasal hair only filter large particle and is not that effective for smaller particles. It's what I specialise in so I didnt want to go overboard on this forum.

You do have a point about grease if you only use it sparingly.

I just finished installation of suspension arm into my car atm and I figured that if I put a whole slab of them on the joint then not much dirt/moisture will get down into the contact surface of the joint.

Anyone think I should wipe the grease off?

Edited by 9krpm

From Wikipedia

The nasal cavities conditions the air to be received by the areas of the respiratory tract and noses. Owing to the large surface area provided by the conchae, the air passing through the nasal cavity is warmed or cooled to within 1 degree of body temperature. In addition, the air is humidified, and dust and other particulate matter is removed by vibrissae, short, thick hairs, present in the vestibule. The cilia of the respiratory epithelium move the particulate matter towards the pharynx where it is digested.

Sorry my bad, I must have read incorrectly.

So given grease is inert & won't move & remove the dust like the epithelium, I'd suggest wiping it off if you have the QA1 Endura offroad spherical bearings

This is a Nissan ball joint, note that it has a dust cover and yes it is full of grease.

ball-joint-40161-48W00.jpg

Nissan warranty their ball joints for 100,000 k's, they expect it to last at least that long because it has a seal to keep the dust out and the grease in.

On a race car I would, and do, use exposed (no dust shield) spherical bearings. Yes, we do meticulously clean them after every race. But we still replace them frequently because they wear out very fast when exposed to dust, dirt, grit, water and sand etc even for a very short time. If you don't mind the cost in time and money doing that, then by all means run your sphericals exposed.

Cheers

Gary

This is a Nissan ball joint, note that it has a dust cover and yes it is full of grease.

ball-joint-40161-48W00.jpg

Nissan warranty their ball joints for 100,000 k's, they expect it to last at least that long because it has a seal to keep the dust out and the grease in.

On a race car I would, and do, use exposed (no dust shield) spherical bearings. Yes, we do meticulously clean them after every race. But we still replace them frequently because they wear out very fast when exposed to dust, dirt, grit, water and sand etc even for a very short time. If you don't mind the cost in time and money doing that, then by all means run your sphericals exposed.

Cheers

Gary

A nissan or any factory ball joint is a metal on metal joint with no liner. The grease is effectivly the liner.

In after market rod ends/heims they use a teflon/nylon liner instead of grease.

You can buy rod ends with grease nipples, but almost all race teams recommend against using them

  • 3 years later...

Thread revival :)

Seeing how adjustable traction rods are time consuming to set with all the other components, where would be the best place be to get them done?

The suspension place I have taken my car to for alignments have closed their workshop :(

We have all the bump steer gauges, allignment gear and corner weights to set them up.

Do them all the time so have shocks with no springs etc all ready to bolt into the car so do t have to pull your shocks apart to do the setup.

It's easy to spend a whole day doing it from scratch.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Next on the to-do list was an oil and filter change. Nothing exciting to add here except the oil filter is in a really stupid place (facing the engine mount/subframe/steering rack). GReddy do a relocation kit which puts it towards the gearbox, I would have preferred towards the front but there's obviously a lot more stuff there. Something I'll have to look at for the next service perhaps. First time using Valvoline oil, although I can't see it being any different to most other brands Nice... The oil filter location... At least the subframe wont rust any time soon I picked up a genuine fuel filter, this is part of the fuel pump assembly inside the fuel tank. Access can be found underneath the rear seat, you'll see this triangular cover Remove the 3x plastic 10mm nuts and lift the cover up, pushing the rubber grommet through The yellow fuel line clips push out in opposite directions, remove these completely. The two moulded fuel lines can now pull upwards to disconnect, along with the wire electrical plug. There's 8x 8mm bolts that secure the black retaining ring. The fuel pump assembly is now ready to lift out. Be mindful of the fuel hose on the side, the hose clamp on mine was catching the hose preventing it from lifting up The fuel pump/filter has an upper and lower section held on by 4 pressure clips. These did take a little bit of force, it sounded like the plastic tabs were going to break but they didn't (don't worry!) The lower section helps mount the fuel pump, there's a circular rubber gasket/grommet/seal thing on the bottom where the sock is. Undo the hose clip on the short fuel hose on the side to disconnect it from the 3 way distribution pipe to be able to lift the upper half away. Don't forget to unplug the fuel pump too! There's a few rubber O rings that will need transferring to the new filter housing, I show these in the video at the bottom of this write up. Reassembly is the reverse Here's a photo of the new filter installed, you'll be able to see where the tabs are more clearing against the yellow OEM plastic Once the assembly is re-installed, I turned the engine over a few times to help build up fuel pressure. I did panic when the car stopped turning over but I could hear the fuel pump making a noise. It eventually started and has been fine since. Found my 'lucky' coin underneath the rear seat too The Youtube video can be seen here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uLJ65pmQt44&t=6s
    • It was picked up on the MOT/Inspection that the offside front wheel bearing had excessive play along with the ball joint. It made sense to do both sides so I sourced a pair of spare IS200 hubs to do the swap. Unfortunately I don't have any photos of the strip down but here's a quick run down. On the back of the hub is a large circular dust cover, using a flat head screw driver and a mallet I prised it off. Underneath will reveal a 32mm hub nut (impact gun recommended). With the hub nut removed the ABS ring can be removed (I ended up using a magnetic pick up tool to help). Next up is to remove the stub axle, this was a little trickier due to limited tools. I tried a 3 leg puller but the gap between the hub and stub axle wasn't enough for the legs to get in and under. Next option was a lump hammer and someone pulling the stub axle at the same time. After a few heavy hits it released. The lower bearing race had seized itself onto the stub axle, which was fine because I was replacing them anyway. With the upper bearing race removed and the grease cleaned off they looked like this The left one looked pristine inside but gave us the most trouble. The right one had some surface rust but came apart in a single hit, figure that out?! I got a local garage to press the new wheel bearings in, reassemble was the opposite and didn't take long at all. Removing the hub itself was simple. Starting with removing the brake caliper, 2x 14mm bolts for the caliper slider and 2x 19mm? for the carrier > hub bolts. I used a cable tie to secure the caliper to the upper arm so it was out of the way, there's a 10mm bolt securing the ABS sensor on. With the brake disc removed from the hub next are the three castle nuts for the upper and lower ball joints and track rod end. Two of these had their own R clip and one split pin. A few hits with the hammer and they're released (I left the castle nuts on by a couple of turns), the track rod ends gave me the most grief and I may have nipped the boots (oops). Fitting is the reversal and is very quick and easy to do. The lower ball joints are held onto the hub by 2x 17mm bolts. The castle nut did increase in socket size to 22mm from memory (this may vary from supplier) The two front tyres weren't in great condition, so I had those replaced with some budget tyres for the time being. I'll be replacing the wheels and tyres in the future, this was to get me on the road without the worry of the police hassling me.
    • Yep, the closest base tune available was for the GTT, I went with that and made all the logical changes I could find to convert it to Naturally Aspirated. It will rev fine in Neutral to redline but it will be cutting nearly 50% fuel the whole way.  If I let it tune the fuel map to start with that much less fuel it wont run right and has a hard time applying corrections.  These 50% cuts are with a fuel map already about half of what the GTT tune had.  I was having a whole lot of bogging when applying any throttle but seem to have fixed that for no load situations with very aggressive transient throttle settings. I made the corrections to my injectors with data I found for them online, FBCJC100 flowing 306cc.  I'll have to look to see if I can find the Cam section. I have the Bosch 4.9 from Haltech. My manifold pressure when watching it live is always in -5.9 psi/inHg
    • Hi My Tokico BM50 Brake master cylinder has a leak from the hole between the two outlets (M10x1) for brake pipes, I have attached a photo. Can anyone tell me what that hole is and what has failed to allow brake fluid to escape from it, I have looked on line and asked questions on UK forums but can not find the answer, if anyone can enlighten me I would be most grateful.
    • It will be a software setting. I don't believe many on here ever used AEM. And they're now a discontinued product,that's really hard to find any easy answers on. If it were Link or Haltech, someone would be able to just send you a ECU file though.
×
×
  • Create New...