Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

they are both the same thing. just one valve doing the job of two. its proper name as listed in the workshop manual is IACV-AAC Valve. its doing the job of the idle air control and the auxiliary/accessory air control.

here is a page from the R34 workshop manual that shows some troubleshooting for different engine faults. issues with cold starting is listed. i know S1 isnt the same as R34 but its still basically the same thing.

post-34711-1249296512_thumb.jpg

Beacuse your car idles fine once its started it probably not the AAC valve, but becuse it's a quick job, 30 min, it would be worth doing anyway. It just unbolts off the back of the plenum, then when its out carefully pull the valve apart remembering how it goes back together, and give it all a good clean with some degreaser or carby clean. There is a good tutorial in the DYI section that would be worth having a look at before attempting.

Edited by QWK32
well hugh care to share with us? Where did u get ur manual?

Ben what are you doing on thursday?

I'm keen to clean both those valves on thursday... Anyone done them? How hard is it?

Its on disc, I think I got it from Tangles. I may be able to do a copy, will let you know later.

you can prime the pump a few times before starting to rule out check valve, mine does it, i have done everything except the valve under the plenum... already done the thing at the back, AFM etc idle is perfect, just that cold start issue. done it whole time i have had my car and never failed me, but gonna chase it down before i sell...

mine does the same thing, cold morning start up and the idle is rough and hunts around for afew seconds then piks up the revs to the 1500 (or so) then settles to 1200 or sumfin.

if i start it and hold the accelerator abit its starts perfect nice and smooth

its been doin it for a while. ive primed it several times before i start it but it stil does it

im gona giv this AAC valve clean a go and see what the results are :happy:

well hugh care to share with us? Where did u get ur manual?

Ben what are you doing on thursday?

I'm keen to clean both those valves on thursday... Anyone done them? How hard is it?

I'm probably available Thursday night, but won't be leaving work until after 5. Saturday would be a better bet if you want to run some diags.

Ok,

So i need to clean this :

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Di...l&hl=idling (AAC Valve)

And this:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Ai...nce-t69151.html (Air Regulator)

Ryan, You talk of one being under the plenum and it being a Kent to get to.... which one is that? by the looks of those two it doesnt seem like either of them?

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Ai...nce-t69151.html (Air Regulator)

Ryan, You talk of one being under the plenum and it being a Kent to get to.... which one is that? by the looks of those two it doesnt seem like either of them?

Hey mate

I'm sure that "Air regulator Maintenance DIY" is just for rb20's.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...