Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

G'day all..

Just for a quick run down I drive a 1998 R34 GT-T.. Now recently I've had some work done to my car, I've finally upgraded my clutch (Heavy single Xtreme) and I've now got an ECU (ViPEC).. However, when I had this work done it was discovered that I had a far bit of lateral movement in my crank, about 5mm of north-south movement, the case was that the thustbearings were shot and I ended up having to get a replacement RB25 crank (Polished and machined, was only about $200). I also had some cams installed, but due to some god almighty collection of @rse-ups.. I ended up having to replace 2/3 valves, all my springs and some cleaning up had to be done... So I bit the bullet and I've gone for performance springs and 260/260 9.15mm Tomei Poncams (Type B). Basically my head is now in fine condition for what future plans I have..

Now, the issue..

I've always been in favour of displacement increase in the RB engines.. Yes stock capacity is fine and YES the tomei 2.8 kit is rather exy, however, to achieve my dream built I'm quite happy to part with the money. So, what follows? I've been thinking turbos to match such a set-up.. My primary concern is that I want my car to be driveable, responsive and to have easy/useable power through most the rev range, as I consider peak/top end power, to be very much a secondary concern. I'm in favour of something low mount, I just like the idea of not being outrageous and I really want to keep the car as inconspicuous as possible. I was thinking a 3037 low mount and if nessicary, I'd have it externally gated in order to handle the extra boot from the 2.8 litre capacity. I've been told that this turbo will not suffice and that it will basically be a bottleneck in my system (In which case, a HKS 3040 would be better, or even a T04), would this actually be the case? Is a low-mount configuration totally out of the question with a 2.8 setup??? If I was so keen to stay low-mount, could I possibly take a note from TWOOGLE and go for twin GTRS's, or is that total overkill, with a combined boost/power output of potentially 800PS???

Was also considering going for aftermarket intake and exhaust manifolds, on the exhaust side, either HKS or 6 boost, depending on availability (in which case, I'd probably need a HKS dump for the new turbo/s). Would probably go for a GReddy intake manifold, it has been done on an RB25 and it does wonders for cleaning up the engine bay and removing a plethora of annoying and performance reducing piping... Between doing BOTH in the intake and exhaust, I'm again hoping to achieve a responsive turbo/engine setup, as I've heard that BOTH of these upgrades can recoup as much as 200/300/400RPM of boost response apiece, which is exactly what I want..

Also I would have to address the fueling obviously, aftermarket rail and 600cc (or 750cc injectors?) would go in, I've already got a NISMO fuel pump... Is there anything else I'd need to seriously consider?? I'd be more than happy to even have the engine held back until I could afford gearbox/drivetrain upgrades.. I've been told that the stock stuff will take 450BHP, again, is this in fact true?? Basically, I'm not concerned about how MUCH power I make, but HOW my car makes the power... Which is why, I'm a huge fan of the 2.8 kit, with billet crank. Would be nice to have it going to 8k RPM! :)

Oh, and yes, I've got aftermarket coilovers and rear traction bars and camber arms.. I will be looking for either R34 GTR brakes of Brembo F50's as the dollar keeps imporving against the yen. But yes, I've address handling, if anything, just braking to go, and again yes, I run on good rubber. Toyo's. :)

Pleas please please, any informed/well thought out information, input, opinions are very welcome.. I'm just looking out for ideas and notes from people that have 'been there and done that'. I'm not the full bottle on this but I've read tonnes of stuff both on SAU and from import mags, please don't be condecending, but if your views differ from my vision, please, I want to hear it, but back it up with facts/examples/logic. As I, and many others, come on here to learn about our cars, and I'm still keen to learn, especially with such plans on the horizon..

Thanks very much. Let's hear it!

:yes::D:):banana::banana::banana::banana:

Ta.

Mark.

Edited by Marco-R34GTT

It was a tale of one thing after another... If anything I wanted to go to RB26 crank, rods and forged pistons... But yeah, didn't happen..

@sexy.

Just making it easier for people to give advice, I've got a clear sense of direction but not sure how to get there. :-)

Not dismissing the 30 option at all bubs.. Just that I was under the impression that the 30 bottom end would require a fair bit of work.. Plus the Tomei kit is billet, but all options are open dude! :D

Soz if I sounded out of order, or dismissive or something... :-)

Mark, Speaking from experience, anything more than 400rwhp in a RWD car is overkill, yes it's fun, but impossible to get grip. I've spent more money than any sane person would and personally I'd go for a smaller responsive turbo, peak power isn't everything, response and driveability are more important.

Mark, Speaking from experience, anything more than 400rwhp in a RWD car is overkill, yes it's fun, but impossible to get grip. I've spent more money than any sane person would and personally I'd go for a smaller responsive turbo, peak power isn't everything, response and driveability are more important.

That is exactly my goal... But with discplacement increase, be it 28 or 30 or whatever.. What would be the BEST turbo to match with the increased displacement in order to attain said goals? That is what I'm most confused about. :D

If you wanted a more broad and progressive turbo setup definitely go for a twin setup as you can spread the torque a bit better. GTRS's are good for this. A 30 bottom end is almost bullet proof as it is, I remember a VL with the stock 30 bottom end and a 25 head few years ago over east was running about 600hp unopened bottom end but worked top end and a dirty big turbo on it, they are tough as nuts. You're 25 bottom end would be fine for a 400hp goal though so I wouldn't worry too much about it. (unless you actually want more power AND for it to be bloody reliable).

I'm running just shy of 400awhp on my GTR mate and even I can't use all the power, the midrange is bloody awesome though, and that's where it's mostly needed anyways (as I tend to want to power out of sweeping bends all the time heh.) Only thing i want is a respray coz of the prick who keyed me :D

Edited by stormtrooper

Well considering they would have had the engine out to pull the crank out..

RB30 bottom end - $100ish

New rings + rehone - $few hundred

Crank grinding - $100ish

Balancing - $few hundred?

New bearings (mains & bigends) - $160ish

Tap tensioner location

Modify power steering bracket

Bolt head/manifolds/ancillaries on

Put back in car

That's a basic 30 build and would handle 400rwhp easy with a sensible rev limit. If you had a bit of extra coin then a crank collar a better oil pump would be on the cards.

Even cheaper if you find a good condition running 30 to start with.

Basically, if you ever have to rebuild, then the cost of going a 30 is negligible.

Edited by bubba

Like a mate of mine. Owns a GTI-R pulsar with a spare motor sitting on an engine hoist in his garage, he cbf working on it anymore so when he'd finished paying it all off etc, he bought a 310rwkw S15..... damn. :D Think we'd all love to have something else sitting around just in case. As for me, it's the wifes Echo ... lolz.

Cheers for the input lads! :huh:

Still, not too sure which way to go in terms of turbos.. What are you running bubba?? Single? Twins? That is really the major factor, what to bolt up to a 15/18 or 15/30 setup... :P

Id consider the Plazmaman plenum over the Greddy, simply as I like the design better and theres less copys floating about that you might get stung with. That and it's an australian company.

I'd say a 30 would be alot cheaper (depending on how you build it ) than the Tomei 2.8 kit if you were heading down that path?

Thats really all I have on the topic, other than maybe running a surge tank as well for the fueling system?

The dirty30 would be a very good choice.

properly balanced and an aftermarket balancer ross/ati they will rev to 8k

be considerably cheaper then a stroker kit too

Go with a big single to save alot on buying 2x the turbos,manifolds,etc

Have a read through Cubes thread. He has a low mount rb25/30 making 400hp? on stock manifolds (i think)

however engineering a rb30 and licensing it these days might be more of an issue over a rb25 with a 2.8 stroker

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...