Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey,

Recently had the car nistuned. Z32 Computer etc.

Car is now running 200Kw atw safely with no ping and good afrs. Required around 14+ psi on stock turbo. Yes im aware of the risks involved. In the past with a remap it ran the same with 12psi but developed some pretty bad detonation. Too much timing apparently and this had to be retarded considerably to achieve similar output without ping (is was being tuned on a hot day too, bout 30 degrees +) But the boost required to achieve 200 ATW seemed a bit excessive considering what others have posted...This engine seems to really dislike advancing the timing...

Ill be highflowing the standard turbo very soon the question is..... running the SAME pressure (say 14 to 15psi) with a highflowed turbo as opposed to the stocker, should i be expecting any sort Kw gain?? or it simply just assuring no turbine failure?

Looking for 250Kw ultimately. and i cant see how an extra 3 or 4 psi is gonna achieve that

r33 Gtst Series 2

85k on the clock.

JJR Return Flow FMIC

Nistuned

3inch exhaust split front dump

High Flow Panel

EBC

Stock Fuel Pump

Stock Clutch

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/288072-r33-gtst-s2/
Share on other sites

So altering/hi-flowing the turbo and no tune?

Who knows, could be a dead motor.

As for once you have a tune - how much power is made, purely relies on the hiflow itself, what wheel combination is chosen and so on

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/288072-r33-gtst-s2/#findComment-4827611
Share on other sites

So altering/hi-flowing the turbo and no tune?

Who knows, could be a dead motor.

As for once you have a tune - how much power is made, purely relies on the hiflow itself, what wheel combination is chosen and so on

hiflowing the turbo and having it tuned to suit.

dead motor. how so?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/288072-r33-gtst-s2/#findComment-4827647
Share on other sites

Ill be highflowing the standard turbo very soon the question is..... running the SAME pressure (say 14 to 15psi) with a highflowed turbo as opposed to the stocker, should i be expecting any sort Kw gain?? or it simply just assuring no turbine failure?

yes, kw gain. the highflow should be moving more air. ie. more power (with suitable tune etc etc etc)

Edited by Munkyb0y
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/288072-r33-gtst-s2/#findComment-4827666
Share on other sites

also consider injectors. its asking a lot of the stockers at 250kw, if they get there at all.

what are the stock injectors good for usually?

Gave her a bootfull a couple of times on the way home. EBC shows peak of 14.7! dyno showed this spike, and then drop off to around 13 which it holds. Pretty much wheelspin from 5k in 1st. But 3 attempts at that and the clutch feels pretty soft...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/288072-r33-gtst-s2/#findComment-4827775
Share on other sites

if the timing and injection values were set correctly on other load points by a good tuner and if the car was treated to a new turbo, then chances of it blowing up is quite minimal, no need to dramatise :blink:

most tuners just focus on the map trace and ignore other cells, hence sometimes you get ridiculous knock going up a hill or down shifting.

if a tuner smooths out the ignition and injection settings for everycell on the map, then there is no need to worry for such a mild motor.

For example with the stock turbo you're only hitting rows 16, and with the aftermarket one you're hitting rows 17 on the load map, and if only rows 16 and prior were tuned, then you'll have a problem.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/288072-r33-gtst-s2/#findComment-4829195
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...