Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey,

Recently had the car nistuned. Z32 Computer etc.

Car is now running 200Kw atw safely with no ping and good afrs. Required around 14+ psi on stock turbo. Yes im aware of the risks involved. In the past with a remap it ran the same with 12psi but developed some pretty bad detonation. Too much timing apparently and this had to be retarded considerably to achieve similar output without ping (is was being tuned on a hot day too, bout 30 degrees +) But the boost required to achieve 200 ATW seemed a bit excessive considering what others have posted...This engine seems to really dislike advancing the timing...

Ill be highflowing the standard turbo very soon the question is..... running the SAME pressure (say 14 to 15psi) with a highflowed turbo as opposed to the stocker, should i be expecting any sort Kw gain?? or it simply just assuring no turbine failure?

Looking for 250Kw ultimately. and i cant see how an extra 3 or 4 psi is gonna achieve that

r33 Gtst Series 2

85k on the clock.

JJR Return Flow FMIC

Nistuned

3inch exhaust split front dump

High Flow Panel

EBC

Stock Fuel Pump

Stock Clutch

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/288072-r33-gtst-s2/
Share on other sites

So altering/hi-flowing the turbo and no tune?

Who knows, could be a dead motor.

As for once you have a tune - how much power is made, purely relies on the hiflow itself, what wheel combination is chosen and so on

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/288072-r33-gtst-s2/#findComment-4827611
Share on other sites

So altering/hi-flowing the turbo and no tune?

Who knows, could be a dead motor.

As for once you have a tune - how much power is made, purely relies on the hiflow itself, what wheel combination is chosen and so on

hiflowing the turbo and having it tuned to suit.

dead motor. how so?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/288072-r33-gtst-s2/#findComment-4827647
Share on other sites

Ill be highflowing the standard turbo very soon the question is..... running the SAME pressure (say 14 to 15psi) with a highflowed turbo as opposed to the stocker, should i be expecting any sort Kw gain?? or it simply just assuring no turbine failure?

yes, kw gain. the highflow should be moving more air. ie. more power (with suitable tune etc etc etc)

Edited by Munkyb0y
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/288072-r33-gtst-s2/#findComment-4827666
Share on other sites

also consider injectors. its asking a lot of the stockers at 250kw, if they get there at all.

what are the stock injectors good for usually?

Gave her a bootfull a couple of times on the way home. EBC shows peak of 14.7! dyno showed this spike, and then drop off to around 13 which it holds. Pretty much wheelspin from 5k in 1st. But 3 attempts at that and the clutch feels pretty soft...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/288072-r33-gtst-s2/#findComment-4827775
Share on other sites

if the timing and injection values were set correctly on other load points by a good tuner and if the car was treated to a new turbo, then chances of it blowing up is quite minimal, no need to dramatise :blink:

most tuners just focus on the map trace and ignore other cells, hence sometimes you get ridiculous knock going up a hill or down shifting.

if a tuner smooths out the ignition and injection settings for everycell on the map, then there is no need to worry for such a mild motor.

For example with the stock turbo you're only hitting rows 16, and with the aftermarket one you're hitting rows 17 on the load map, and if only rows 16 and prior were tuned, then you'll have a problem.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/288072-r33-gtst-s2/#findComment-4829195
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah i found that alot of parts can be wrong or "very" hard to get the real right one. I already bought some brakes years ago on me "old" GT calipers and they were wrong too 😄  I told them too. Even send them pictures...but they said "EBC catalogue has them on my car... So i dont know what their answer will be. I call monday them and let them know that they are really not on my car. If they were they would be already on a car...
    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
×
×
  • Create New...