Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just wondering - I want my car to be setup for lots of torque low down - max power is not much of a concern for me. I want a similar setup to a stock ford XR5 ---> http://www.drive.com.au/Editorial/ArticleD...ArticleID=12454

Is it possible to keep almost everything stock.

My goal is to keep it modest without the need to have too many bits changed. I'm aming for something around 120 to 140rwkw.

Basically the setup I'm "thinking" about is:

- GTT exhaust manifold and a small turbo for quicker spool. (stock turbo??)

- Stock GTT piping to stock GTT SMIC.

- Custom piping from GTT SMIC to the throttle body (the DE is different to the DET - due to the "Y" pipe setup on the DE)

Will the ECU, injectors and fuel pump need to be changed for a modest setup?

How many psi will i need to run to achieve the output I want.

My car is an r34 non-turbo, auto

to make 120 to 140kw you won't need to run very much boost at all. even 5psi would see you close i'd say.

as for turbo choice, the stock will do nicely. plenty of response. you have to remember that a NA engine will spool a turbo earlier than a turbo because of the higher compression. with the stock turbo you should have full boost by under 2500rpm. on my r33 gts-t (slightly smaller turbo than the r34 turbo) i was making 14psi by well under 3000rpm with the stock turbo.

ecu will need to be altered to take into account the extra airflow. fuel pump would probably be ok (i'm not sure if they are the same pump as a turbo) and it would be good to upgrade the injectors to the stock turbo ones to be safe but the NA ones may cope

R34 GT? Injectors are smaller as is the fuel pump. Whether you'll need an uprated fuel pump and injectors for <140kw I'm really not sure, but it's not a bad idea and best to be safe and allow room for expansion later on. I'm really not sure at what point they reach their full duty cycle though.

Once again you'll need to look at how you're going to handle fuel AND timing, being an auto eManage Blue or EMU would be your best choice as you have an auto.

You're after low down response and torque over pure power, so the saying it's the power under the peak power curve that counts holds true here. You want to make the majority of your power down low and in the mid-range of the power band, but you don't really want to sacrifice TOO much top end either IMO. Therefore I think an RB20 turbo would be a bit small... whilst it will spool up quickly, high compression will help that anyway and I think you'll be better off with an RB25 turbo to get a nice balance, not to mention the age of the turbo.

With 3" from the turbo-back w/hi-flow cat and an R33 Turbo, 5PSI is achieveable VERY quickly! Around 2000rpm.

A factory SMIC will bemore responsive, though with high compression turbo you want to ensure adequate cooling, but for 5PSI I think you should be ok.. go with a R34 SMIC as they're thicker and a common upgrade for R33GTSt, and get the duct/shroud to ensure cold air flow to it.

Provided your gearbox is in good condition, I would look at also doing the valve body upgrade to strengthen the box and make shifts quicker, provided it is in good condition though! My box was flaring a bit, and after the turbo conversion it showed me how bad it realy was. After adding more power well it's now in getting completely overhauled. At 5PSI though with a good box you shouldn't have too much problem, though with a torquey set up there's that to consider. SO yes, a good box, valve body upgrade I believe should see you well and make the most of that low down response.

In regards to the eManage with that be controlling the shifts for the auto or will the Trans control unit be controlling the shifts. I read somewhere that the non turbo variants have a separate ECU and TCU.

Your Factory ECU will still continue to function as normal and control shifts, the eManage will remap the fuel map and ignition signals +/- what the tuner sets. Basically the ECU will continue to function oblivious to what's going on, and the eManage takes over to correct it.

  • 2 weeks later...

now have most of the parts needed. Front mount. stock manifold and turbo, down pipe, ecu, injectors and bosch 040 fuel pump just need cooler pipeing and braded lines. got a realy good price to. $600 for the lot.

will have have to chase up a loom or can i use my own?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...