Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

just sat my 25/30 in my 32 and the intake manifold i've got wont fit with the clutch line where it is. The line on mine comes out of the bottom of the cylinder, if it come out the side would probably be fine( though couldn't hurt if the cylinder was slightly shorter). The picture on the just jap web site of the hcr32/cefiro one has the line coming out the side, can anyone tell me if it does? and what about the r33 cylinder? is it longer or shorter than the 32 and does the fluid line come out the side or bottom? would it fit the in 32 easily. will be running a 25 slave cylinder if that matters. Any info is much appreciated.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/289589-clutch-cylinder-for-32/
Share on other sites

I've had similar problems, but used a different plenum (CPC).

S14 and R31(aus) have the line out the side.

Pic is of r31 relocated higher.

http://i223.photobucket.com/albums/dd81/30...ster-cleara.jpg

more pics here http://s223.photobucket.com/albums/dd81/30det/

R33 GTSt master cylinder is shorter than 32 and I think the line comes out the bottom (can check if needed).

I got one thinking my plenum wasn't going to clear (as matey had problems with his GREddy plenum) but my custom GTR plenum didn't foul.

thanks guys. I'll mesure up and see if the r33 20mm shorter will work( i've got a 25 box so will keep master, slave the same as factory). Also checked a mates s13 and was same cylinder diameter (5/8) was shorter than mine and the line was coming out the side.

  • 2 months later...

Thanks all ,i just did this works in a R31 aswell RB30DET with redrilled/elongated engine mount brackets holes drivers side by 15mm lower ,passenger bolt holes elongated by half a hole is all it would go.

I took turbo side engine mount bracket (4 bolts off) then plenum Greddy copy just fitted past clutch master cylinder from r33.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Kapr Haha yeah thats the one. I missed that you had a built up engine, I wouldn't want to run it on there either then. It was good in my situation just to replace the original turbo on a stock engine. @MBS206Yep definitely not a replacement for anything name brand
    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
×
×
  • Create New...